Autonomous Driving Ethics: Self-driving Cars Facing Trolley Problems

Yicheng Xiang

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/15/20231039

Research Article

Open access

Published on 26 October 2023

Download pdf

Xiang,Y. (2023). Autonomous Driving Ethics: Self-driving Cars Facing Trolley Problems. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,15,96-102.

Export citation

Autonomous Driving Ethics: Self-driving Cars Facing Trolley Problems

Yicheng Xiang *^,1,

¹ East China University of Political Science and Law

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/15/20231039

Abstract

The trolley problem has always been one of the most famous ethical dilemmas in human history, arousing millions of arguments and discussions. When self-driving cars, as products of our new age, encounter the trolley problem, the decisions made will be different from those of human beings due to the particularity of the cars and the autopilot algorithm. This paper will first determine the definition and scope of the trolley problem, and then compare the difference between autonomous cars and traditional ones. It then proposes possible guidance for the autopilot algorithms from legal and ethical perspectives. Despite a long history, ethical methods for autonomous cars are still uncertain and hard to be accepted by everyone. Perhaps the combination of different ethical approaches could greatly ameliorate this problem. The feature of hysteresis of law makes it impossible to provide guidance for autonomous cars in time, but laws can help build abstract principles for autopilot algorithms from the perspective of reducing legal liability.

Keywords

trolley problem, autonomous driving, autopilot algorithm, ethical approaches, legal liability

View pdf

References

[1]. Andrade G. (2019) Medical ethics and the trolley Problem. J Med Ethics Hist Med. Mar 17; 12:3. PMID: 31346396; PMCID: PMC6642460.

[2]. Bruers, S., Braeckman, J. (2014) A Review and Systematization of the Trolley Problem. Philosophia 42, 251–269.

[3]. Thomas Aquinas. (2013) Summa Theologica. Shanghai, The Commercial Press.

[4]. Lawlor, R. (2022) The Ethics of Automated Vehicles: Why Self-driving Cars Should not Swerve in Dilemma Cases. Res Publica 28, 193–216.

[5]. Zheng Ge. (2022) Trolley Problem and Ethical Considerations in Algorithm Design for Automated Vehicles. Zhejiang Social Sciences, No.316(12):37-47+67+156.

[6]. Anderson, S.L. (2008) Asimov’s “three laws of robotics” and machine metaethics. AI & Soc 22, 477–493.

[7]. Wei Xinquan. (2023) Research on algorithm governance in extreme situations of autonomous driving. Cybersecurity and Data Governance, 42(03):38-45.

[8]. Geisslinger, M., Poszler, F., Betz, J. et al, (2021) Autonomous Driving Ethics: from Trolley Problem to Ethics of Risk. Philos. Technol. 34, 1033–1055.

[9]. Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R. et al. (2018) The Moral Machine experiment. Nature 563, 59–64.

[10]. Lim H，Taeihagh A. (2019) Algorithmic decision-making in AVs: understanding ethical and technical concerns for smart cities. Sustainability, 11(20): 5791.

[11]. Chu Chencheng. (2018) The Criminal Legitimacy of Solving the “Trolley Dilemma” in Automatic Car Programming. Global Law Review, 40(03):82-99.

[12]. Wang Gang. (2011) The Duty of Tolerance and Limits of the Innocent Third Party in Emergency Avoidance and the Justification of Emergency Avoidance. Peking University Law Journal, 23(03):609-625.

Cite this article

Xiang,Y. (2023). Autonomous Driving Ethics: Self-driving Cars Facing Trolley Problems. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,15,96-102.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries

Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/

ISBN：978-1-83558-055-4(Print) / 978-1-83558-056-1(Online)

Conference date: 7 August 2023

Editor：Enrique Mallen, Javier Cifuentes-Faura

Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

Volume number: Vol.15

ISSN：2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).