References
[1]. Biscop, Sven. European strategy in the 21st century: new future for old power. Routledge, 2018.
[2]. Pu, Xiaoyu, and Chengli Wang. “Rethinking China’s rise: Chinese scholars debate strategic overstretch.” International Affairs 94.5 (2018): 1019-1035.
[3]. MacDonald, Paul K., and Joseph M. Parent. Twilight of the titans: Great power decline and retrenchment. Cornell University Press, 2018.
[4]. Doshi, Rush. The long game: China’s grand strategy to displace American order. Oxford University Press, 2021.
[5]. Goldstein, Avery. “China’s grand strategy under Xi Jinping: reassurance, reform, and resistance.” International Security 45.1 (2020): 164-201.
[6]. Xuetong, Yan. Leadership and the rise of great powers. Princeton University Press, 2019.
[7]. Beeson, Mark. “Geoeconomics with Chinese characteristics: the BRI and China’s evolving grand strategy.” Economic and Political Studies 6.3 (2018): 240-256.
[8]. Paul, Thazha V. Restraining great powers: Soft balancing from empires to the global era. Yale University Press, 2018.
[9]. Chen, Zhimin, and Xueying Zhang. “Chinese conception of the world order in a turbulent Trump era.” The Pacific Review 33.3-4 (2020): 438-468.
[10]. Shifrinson, Joshua R. Itzkowitz. Rising titans, falling giants: how great powers exploit power shifts. Cornell University Press, 2018.
[11]. Do, Thuy T. “Vietnam’s growing agency in the twenty-first century.” The Pacific Review 35.2 (2022): 319-341.
[12]. He, Kai, and Mingjiang Li. “Understanding the dynamics of the Indo-Pacific: US–China strategic competition, regional actors, and beyond.” International Affairs 96.1 (2020): 1-7.
[13]. Blackwill, Robert D., and Thomas Wright. “The end of world order and American foreign policy.” (2020): 43.
[14]. Koga, Kei. “Japan’s ‘Indo-Pacific’question: countering China or shaping a new regional order?.” International Affairs 96.1 (2020): 49-73.
[15]. Creutz, Katja, et al. The changing global order and its implications for the EU. Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FIIA), 2019.
[16]. Xie, Zhihai. “Japan’s Role in Rebuilding the Rules-Based International Order.”.
[17]. Zhang, Enyu, and Patrick James. “All Roads Lead to Beijing: Systemism, Power Transition Theory and the Belt and Road Initiative.” Chinese Political Science Review (2022): 1-27.
[18]. Jervis, R. (2017). Perception and Misperception in International Politics: New Edition. Princeton University Press.
[19]. He, Kai. “Role conceptions, order transition and institutional balancing in the Asia-Pacific: A new theoretical framework.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 72.2 (2018): 92-109.
[20]. Zhang, Baohui. “When Civilisational Clashes Meet Power Shifts: Rethinking Global Disorder.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 15.4 (2022): 352-373.
Cite this article
Wang,Q. (2023). The U.S.-China Power Shift Which Side Should Operate More Conservatively to Achieve a Peaceful Power Transfer?. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,18,253-259.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Biscop, Sven. European strategy in the 21st century: new future for old power. Routledge, 2018.
[2]. Pu, Xiaoyu, and Chengli Wang. “Rethinking China’s rise: Chinese scholars debate strategic overstretch.” International Affairs 94.5 (2018): 1019-1035.
[3]. MacDonald, Paul K., and Joseph M. Parent. Twilight of the titans: Great power decline and retrenchment. Cornell University Press, 2018.
[4]. Doshi, Rush. The long game: China’s grand strategy to displace American order. Oxford University Press, 2021.
[5]. Goldstein, Avery. “China’s grand strategy under Xi Jinping: reassurance, reform, and resistance.” International Security 45.1 (2020): 164-201.
[6]. Xuetong, Yan. Leadership and the rise of great powers. Princeton University Press, 2019.
[7]. Beeson, Mark. “Geoeconomics with Chinese characteristics: the BRI and China’s evolving grand strategy.” Economic and Political Studies 6.3 (2018): 240-256.
[8]. Paul, Thazha V. Restraining great powers: Soft balancing from empires to the global era. Yale University Press, 2018.
[9]. Chen, Zhimin, and Xueying Zhang. “Chinese conception of the world order in a turbulent Trump era.” The Pacific Review 33.3-4 (2020): 438-468.
[10]. Shifrinson, Joshua R. Itzkowitz. Rising titans, falling giants: how great powers exploit power shifts. Cornell University Press, 2018.
[11]. Do, Thuy T. “Vietnam’s growing agency in the twenty-first century.” The Pacific Review 35.2 (2022): 319-341.
[12]. He, Kai, and Mingjiang Li. “Understanding the dynamics of the Indo-Pacific: US–China strategic competition, regional actors, and beyond.” International Affairs 96.1 (2020): 1-7.
[13]. Blackwill, Robert D., and Thomas Wright. “The end of world order and American foreign policy.” (2020): 43.
[14]. Koga, Kei. “Japan’s ‘Indo-Pacific’question: countering China or shaping a new regional order?.” International Affairs 96.1 (2020): 49-73.
[15]. Creutz, Katja, et al. The changing global order and its implications for the EU. Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FIIA), 2019.
[16]. Xie, Zhihai. “Japan’s Role in Rebuilding the Rules-Based International Order.”.
[17]. Zhang, Enyu, and Patrick James. “All Roads Lead to Beijing: Systemism, Power Transition Theory and the Belt and Road Initiative.” Chinese Political Science Review (2022): 1-27.
[18]. Jervis, R. (2017). Perception and Misperception in International Politics: New Edition. Princeton University Press.
[19]. He, Kai. “Role conceptions, order transition and institutional balancing in the Asia-Pacific: A new theoretical framework.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 72.2 (2018): 92-109.
[20]. Zhang, Baohui. “When Civilisational Clashes Meet Power Shifts: Rethinking Global Disorder.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 15.4 (2022): 352-373.