Research on the Identification of Medical Damage Cases

Research Article
Open access

Research on the Identification of Medical Damage Cases

Jianing Qu 1*
  • 1 The University of Queensland    
  • *corresponding author qjn13561862736@163.com
Published on 26 October 2023 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/19/20231389
LNEP Vol.19
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-83558-063-9
ISBN (Online): 978-1-83558-064-6

Abstract

Medical disputes are acute social problems caused by many factors. With the further deepening of the reform of the medical system, doctor-patient conflicts have become more prominent, and their common manifestation is the dispute over the attribution of medical accidents. How to prevent disputes, alleviate medical conflicts, properly deal with medical tort cases, and improve and refine the legal mechanism of doctor-patient conflicts are particularly important. For a long time, due to the complex and professional characteristics of medical damage cases and the status difference between doctors and patients, and the application of medical damage compensation law involving a large number of professional and complex evidence issues, it has become the primary problem for the district court to accurately grasp the evidence of the case in medical tort litigation, and rationally use the evidence to make a fair judgment. The crux of medical disputes lies in the evidence problem. In view of the strong professionalism in medical disputes, expert opinions and expert assistants' opinions often become the core evidence, and their accurate examination and judgment become the top priority in the settlement of medical damage cases. At present, the appraisal of medical damage faces many specific difficulties and challenges. Therefore, this paper advocates the introduction of a reasonable dialogue mechanism between technology and rules, such as evidence-based evidence from the medical perspective of technology, auxiliary rules construction.

Keywords:

medical damage cases, evidence, appraisal opinion, expert assistants

Qu,J. (2023). Research on the Identification of Medical Damage Cases. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,19,74-81.
Export citation

References

[1]. Brooks Christopher,MacDonald Conor. Medical Cases Adjudicated by the Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada: 2000-2018.[J]. Aerospace medicine and human performance,2020,91(2).

[2]. Catherine A. Marco,Jay M. Brenner,Chadd K. Kraus,Norine A. McGrath,Arthur R. Derse. Refusal of Emergency Medical Treatment: Case Studies and Ethical Foundations[J]. Annals of Emergency Medicine,2017,70(5).

[3]. Lisa Claydon. Should there be a right to die with dignity in certain medical cases in the United Kingdom? Some reflections on the decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court regarding the protection afforded by Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights[J]. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik,2016,19(1).

[4]. CMA welcomes Court of Appeal verdict in private healthcare case[J]. M2 Presswire,2015.

[5]. Lisa Claydon. Should there be a right to die with dignity in certain medical cases in the United Kingdom? Some reflections on the decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court regarding the protection afforded by Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights[J]. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik,2016,19(1).

Cite this article

Qu,J. (2023). Research on the Identification of Medical Damage Cases. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,19,74-81.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries

ISBN：978-1-83558-063-9(Print) / 978-1-83558-064-6(Online)
Editor：Enrique Mallen, Javier Cifuentes-Faura
Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/
Conference date: 7 August 2023
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.19
ISSN：2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Brooks Christopher,MacDonald Conor. Medical Cases Adjudicated by the Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada: 2000-2018.[J]. Aerospace medicine and human performance,2020,91(2).

[2]. Catherine A. Marco,Jay M. Brenner,Chadd K. Kraus,Norine A. McGrath,Arthur R. Derse. Refusal of Emergency Medical Treatment: Case Studies and Ethical Foundations[J]. Annals of Emergency Medicine,2017,70(5).

[3]. Lisa Claydon. Should there be a right to die with dignity in certain medical cases in the United Kingdom? Some reflections on the decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court regarding the protection afforded by Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights[J]. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik,2016,19(1).

[4]. CMA welcomes Court of Appeal verdict in private healthcare case[J]. M2 Presswire,2015.

[5]. Lisa Claydon. Should there be a right to die with dignity in certain medical cases in the United Kingdom? Some reflections on the decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court regarding the protection afforded by Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights[J]. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik,2016,19(1).

For authors
Guide for authors Policies for authors Aims and scope Subscription Open access policy
For editors
Policies for editors Editorial board
For reviewers
Policies for reviewers Privacy policy

Cookies are used by this site.
Copyright © 2024 EWA Publishing, its licensors, and contributors. All rights reserved, including text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.