Mass Media’s Impact on Students’ Mental Health

Yangyang Zhou

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/33/20231543

Research Article

Open access

Published on 3 January 2024

Download pdf

Zhou,Y. (2024). Mass Media’s Impact on Students’ Mental Health. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,33,115-120.

Export citation

Mass Media’s Impact on Students’ Mental Health

Yangyang Zhou *^,1,

¹ Hangzhou Wickham International School

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/33/20231543

Abstract

Contemporary people live in a reality full of intelligent technology construction, and many practical activities are regulated by technology. The chat content generation pre-training program artificial intelligence developed by the Open Artificial Intelligence Research Center (OpenAI) based on large model data training has aroused wide concern because of its generation and learning ability. It is necessary to admit that the current domestic media publicity seems to focus more on the convenience that big data technology may bring to human society. But not much about its own limitations. In the few discussions on the negative effects of big data technology, more concerns are raised about the ethical risks that may be caused by the abuse of relevant technology, such as the threat of "data greed" to personal privacy, and the decision-making errors that may be caused by the superstition of business decision-makers and government heads about "digital dictatorship", etc. From the perspective of philosophy of information technology and philosophy of cognitive science, this paper reviews the gains and losses of big data technology itself in terms of philosophical thought premise and path strategy. Starting from the theory of "moral materialization", this paper analyzes the ethical value load and risk of artificial intelligence from the perspectives of moral subject status, value position presupposition, operation intervention and operation result effect. And from the moral materialization theory of "top-down" approach and "bottom-up" approach to the ethical governance of modern scientific and technological intelligent artifacts.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, moral objectification, Cyborg, ethics of technology

View pdf

References

[1]. CARAYONP,HOONAKKERP,HUNDTAS,etal. Application of human factors to improve usability of clinical decision support for diagnostic decision-making:a scenario-based simulation study[J].BMJ Quality& Safety, 2019,29(4):329-340. (in Chinese

[2]. Zhu Guanghui, Wang Xiwen. Operation mode, Key Technology and Future Prospect of Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019,44(04):113-122. (in Chinese

[3]. CHATTERJEEJ, DETHLEFSN. This new conversational AI model can be your friend, philosopher, and guide and even your worst enemy[J]. Patterns (New York), 2023, 4(1): 100676.

[4]. Ling Xiaoxiong. Cold thinking on science and technology ethics and academic Ethics after the explosion of artificial intelligence [J]. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 2023(04):123.

[5]. Maurice Merleau Ponty. Phenomenology of perception [M]. Translated by Jiang Zhihui. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2001:116.

[6]. YAO Dazhi. Modern Western Philosophy [M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2015:24.

[7]. Liu Zheng. From "Body" to "Flesh" : A Discussion on Merleau-Ponty's Body-involved ethics [J]. Journal of Social Sciences, South China Normal University.2016.

[8]. Zhang Wei. Zang Li Shu: The Chinese approach of internalist technology ethics [J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2018(03) : 116.

[9]. Wang Xiaowei. "Moral Materialization" and ethical governance of Modern Science and Technology [J]. Zhejiang Social Sciences,2023(01) : 119.

[10]. Chen Yongwei. Beyond Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities, Risks and Challenges of generative AI [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2023(3):127-143. (in Chinese.

[11]. Yan Kunru. Do AI machines have the status of moral agents? [J]. Research in Dialectics of Nature, 2019(05):47

[12]. Compilation and Translation Bureau of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin of the CPC Central Committee. The Complete Works of Marx and Engels (Volume 26) [M], Beijing: People's Publishing House, 2014 edition :100.

[13]. Zhao Tingyang. What philosophical questions does artificial intelligence raise? [J]. Cultural Aspects,2020(1).

[14]. LAN Jiang. Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Historical Mission of Humanities and Social Sciences: Starting from the revolution of artificial intelligence [J]. Ideological and Theoretical Education,2023(4):12-1.

[15]. Wang Peinan, Deng Shiqing. Content, algorithms, and Knowledge Power: Risks and responses to artificial Intelligence from the perspective of international communication [J]. International Communication, 2023(04):39.

[16]. Chen Yongwei. Beyond Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities, Risks and Challenges of Generative AI [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 2023 (3) :128.

[17]. Eli Pariser. Filter Bubble: The Internet's Secret manipulation of Us [M]. Fang Shishi, Yang Yuan, trans. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2020:10.

[18]. Carlini N, Tramer F, Wallace E, et al. Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models, USENIX Security Symposium, 2021 (6) : 223.

[19]. Wendell Wallach, Colin Allen. Moral machines: How to make robots know Right from wrong [M]. Wang Xiaohong, trans. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2017.

[20]. Duan Weiwen. The approach and connotation of robot ethics [J]. Science and Society, 2015(2):35.

Cite this article

Zhou,Y. (2024). Mass Media’s Impact on Students’ Mental Health. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,33,115-120.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies

Conference website: https://www.icihcs.org/

ISBN：978-1-83558-245-9(Print) / 978-1-83558-246-6(Online)

Conference date: 15 November 2023

Editor：Javier Cifuentes-Faura, Enrique Mallen

Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

Volume number: Vol.33

ISSN：2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).