References
[1]. De Gosson, Maurice A. Principles of Newtonian and Quantum Mechanics, The: The Need for Planck's Constant [M] H. World Scientific, 2016, pp.3-5.
[2]. Jaeger, Gregg. What in the (quantum) world is macroscopic [J] American Journal of Physics 82.9, 2014, pp.896-905.
[3]. Gbur, Gregory J. Falling Felines and Fundamental Physics [J] Yale University Press, 2019, pp. 264–290.
[4]. Griffiths, David J., and Darrell F. Schroeter. Introduction to quantum mechanics [M] Cambridge university press, 2018, pp.1-3
[5]. Horodecki, Ryszard, et al. Quantum entanglement [J] Reviews of modern physics 81.2, 2009, pp.865.
[6]. Einstein, Albert, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? [J] Physical review 47.10, 1935, pp.777.
[7]. Howard, Don. Who invented the “Copenhagen Interpretation”? A study in mythology [J] Philosophy of Science 71.5, 2004, pp.669-682.
[8]. Bell, John S. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox [J] Physics Physique Fizika 1.3, 1964, pp.195-200.
[9]. Chaves, Rafael, Gabriela Barreto Lemos, and Jacques Pienaar. Causal modeling the delayed-choice experiment [J] Physical review letters 120.19, 2018, pp.190-401.
[10]. Peruzzo, Alberto, et al. A quantum delayed-choice experiment [J] Science 338.6107, 2012, pp.634-637.
[11]. Hiley, B. J., and R. E. Callaghan. Delayed-choice experiments and the Bohm approach [J] Physica Scripta 74.3, 2006, pp.336.
[12]. Holland, Peter R. The quantum theory of motion: an account of the de Broglie-Bohm causal interpretation of quantum mechanics [M] Cambridge university press, 1995, pp.2-6.
Cite this article
Zhang,H. (2023). On the Copenhagen Interpretation and Its Alternative Theories. Theoretical and Natural Science,2,182-187.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Innovation and Applied Physics (CONF-CIAP 2022)
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. De Gosson, Maurice A. Principles of Newtonian and Quantum Mechanics, The: The Need for Planck's Constant [M] H. World Scientific, 2016, pp.3-5.
[2]. Jaeger, Gregg. What in the (quantum) world is macroscopic [J] American Journal of Physics 82.9, 2014, pp.896-905.
[3]. Gbur, Gregory J. Falling Felines and Fundamental Physics [J] Yale University Press, 2019, pp. 264–290.
[4]. Griffiths, David J., and Darrell F. Schroeter. Introduction to quantum mechanics [M] Cambridge university press, 2018, pp.1-3
[5]. Horodecki, Ryszard, et al. Quantum entanglement [J] Reviews of modern physics 81.2, 2009, pp.865.
[6]. Einstein, Albert, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? [J] Physical review 47.10, 1935, pp.777.
[7]. Howard, Don. Who invented the “Copenhagen Interpretation”? A study in mythology [J] Philosophy of Science 71.5, 2004, pp.669-682.
[8]. Bell, John S. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox [J] Physics Physique Fizika 1.3, 1964, pp.195-200.
[9]. Chaves, Rafael, Gabriela Barreto Lemos, and Jacques Pienaar. Causal modeling the delayed-choice experiment [J] Physical review letters 120.19, 2018, pp.190-401.
[10]. Peruzzo, Alberto, et al. A quantum delayed-choice experiment [J] Science 338.6107, 2012, pp.634-637.
[11]. Hiley, B. J., and R. E. Callaghan. Delayed-choice experiments and the Bohm approach [J] Physica Scripta 74.3, 2006, pp.336.
[12]. Holland, Peter R. The quantum theory of motion: an account of the de Broglie-Bohm causal interpretation of quantum mechanics [M] Cambridge university press, 1995, pp.2-6.