Download pdf
Analysis of the Impact of Quantitative Easing Monetary Policy on the Japanese Economy
- 1 International college of Beijing, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Quantitative easing (QE), which was implemented as a measure to address deflation and promote economic growth, is subject to varying interpretations regarding its effectiveness to Japan economy. Supporters attribute the efficacy of quantitative easing (QE) to its role in mitigating a more severe economic decline through the stabilization of asset prices and the maintenance of low interest rates, so preventing future crises. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that divergent viewpoints shed light on the challenges associated with attaining long-term economic expansion. These challenges are often attributed to persistent structural concerns such as a progressively aging population, restrained levels of consumer demand, and cautious levels of company investment. Critics express apprehensions regarding the inadvertent ramifications of extended quantitative easing (QE), encompassing imbalances within financial markets and potential threats to financial stability. This abstract presents a synthesis of several perspectives, highlighting the intricate relationship between quantitative easing (QE) policies and Japan's underlying economic issues. It contributes to a nuanced discussion on the overall effectiveness of QE in the Japanese context.
Keywords
Quantitative easing, economic growth, zero interest rate policy
[1]. Aoki. (2013) A Demographic Perspective on Japans Lost Decades.
[2]. Ueda. (2012) The effectiveness of nontraditional monetary policy measures the case of the Bank of Japan.
[3]. Agnese, P., & SALA, H. (2011). The Driving Forces Behind the Falling Labour Share and Persistent Unemployment in Japan. Pacific Economic Review, 16(5), 577-603.
[4]. Hattori, M., & Yetman, J. (2017) The evolution of inflation expectations in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 46, 53–68.
[5]. Lima, L., Vasconcelos, C.F., Simão, J. and de Mendonça, H.F. (2016) The quantitative easing effect on the stock market of the USA, the UK and Japan: An ARDL approach for the crisis period, Journal of Economic Studies, 43(6), 1006-1021.
[6]. Miyakoshi, T., Shimada, J., amp; Li, K.-W. (2017) The dynamic effects of quantitative easing on stock price: Evidence from Asian Emerging Markets, 2001–2016. International Review of Economics & Finance, 49, 548–567.
[7]. Fujiki, H., Okina, K., Shiratsuka, S. (2001) "Monetary Policy under Zero Interest Rate: Viewpoints of Central Bank Economists," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, 19(1), 89-130.
[8]. Ammer, J., Claessens, S., Tabova, A., Wroblewski, C. (2018) Searching for Yield Abroad: Risk-Taking Through Foreign Investment in U.S. Bonds. International Finance Discussion Paper, (1224), 1–49.
[9]. Shkodina, I., Melnychenko, O., Babenko, M. (2020) Quantitative Easing Policy and Its Impact on The Global Economy. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(33), 513–521.
[10]. Chey, H. (2012) Theories of International Currencies and the Future of the World Monetary Order1. International Studies Review, 14(1), 51–77.
[11]. Schwartz, H. M. (2015) Banking on the FED: QE1-2-3 and the Rebalancing of the Global Economy. New Political Economy, 21(1), 26–48.
[12]. Madsen, R. A. (2004) What went wrong: Aggregate demand, structural reform, and the politics of 1990s Japan. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
[13]. Matousek, R., Papadamou, S., Šević, A., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2019) The effectiveness of quantitative easing: Evidence from Japan. Journal of International Money and Finance, 99, 102068.
Cite this article
Yang,Y. (2024). Analysis of the Impact of Quantitative Easing Monetary Policy on the Japanese Economy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,75,164-171.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).