1. Introduction
The housing market holds a crucial role in the economic dynamics of any region, not only affecting the living conditions of its residents but also shaping the broader economic landscape [1]. California, a highly populous and economically significant state in the United States, serves as a microcosm illustrating the complex interplay between rent prices and the overall economy in the 21st century. Known as the Golden State for its diverse geography, thriving technology sector, and cultural abundance, California's housing market has experienced remarkable transformations and encountered various challenges throughout the years [2]. This study embarks on an exploration of the intricate relationship between rent prices and the state's economy during this century.
This study explores the complex interactions that exist between California's primary economic indicators and rent pricing in the twenty-first century. The average yearly rent price serves as the main point, providing a comprehensive indicator of housing affordability and illuminating the locals' financial circumstances. The study includes the GDP, vacancy rate, and inflation rate as significant independent factors, acknowledging their importance in affecting the dynamics of the housing market. In addition, population growth plays a significant role as a control variable, taking into account its possible impact on housing demand as well as economic indicators.
California's housing market is renowned for its intricate nature, encompassing distinct regional dynamics, diverse demographic compositions, and a susceptibility to macroeconomic influences [2]. In light of these complexities, the study endeavors to untangle the subtle correlations between rental prices and various economic indicators. Through the utilization of quantitative techniques, particularly employing SPSS for conducting multiple regression analysis, this research aims to conduct a thorough investigation into how inflation, GDP fluctuations, vacancy rates, and population growth collectively impact the formation of rent prices within the state.
2. Literature Review
The complex relationship between rent prices and the entire economy has been a subject of extensive scholarly inquiry, particularly in the context of California's dynamic and diversified state. This review of the literature provides an overview of the important discoveries and theories that have affected our knowledge of this relationship.
2.1. Rent Prices and Economic Growth
The relationship between the growth of the economy and rental prices is a highly researched topic in contemporary literature. This debate holds particular importance within the context of California, a state known for its economic vitality. Numerous studies have contributed diverse perspectives to this discussion. Thornberg et al. [1] closely examine the practical consequences of rent control laws in cities across California, investigating whether these policies truly benefit low-income households. Their findings paint a nuanced picture: while rent control does reduce rental costs for middle-income households, it also hinders the expansion of rental housing supply and drives up median rent growth. This contrast highlights the inherent trade-offs involved in intervening in the market.
In their thorough investigation of the state's high housing costs, O'Malley et al. [3] offer insights into the origins and effects of California's housing affordability issues. They emphasize the lack of housing as the main cause of high prices, which is exacerbated by things like neighborhood opposition, environmental regulations, financial disincentives, and a lack of available land. Along with driving up property prices and rentals, this shortage also has a negative impact on the state's overall economic attractiveness and commute times.
Addressing the broader national perspective, Anthony [4] explores the influence of housing affordability on per capita GDP growth in the top 100 most populous metro areas in the United States, taking into account the broader national context. The findings of his study reveal a noteworthy negative impact, underscoring the urgent need to address housing affordability from an economic standpoint. In addition to this perspective, Chakrabarti and Zhang [5] propose a model that sheds light on the connection between unaffordable housing and employment growth, backed by empirical data from municipalities in California.
2.2. Inflation and Rent Prices
The relationship between inflation and rental housing is a topic that has been extensively researched by scholars, studies have shown a strong relationship influenced by geographical and temporal factors This study highlights the interplay between these studies and emphasize their collective contribution to our understanding of this multifaceted relationship.
In the contexts of Malaysia, Zainuddin and Rosylin's [6] study investigates the impact of fundamental factors, such as inflation, on terrace home values in Penang. Their findings imply that the cost of renting terrace residences has no effect on house values. This means that rental costs in Penang remain largely steady, a pattern that is relevant to the broader debate over the influence of inflation on property markets. Agwaral et al.'s [7] Australian study adds to this view by addressing the financial stress encountered by renter households, many of which have lower earnings. Their findings indicate that rent increases, which are impacted by inflation and other factors, might aggravate financial stress. The study underscores the importance of knowing how inflation affects rent pricing, as it can have far-reaching financial effects for households.
Ahrens et al. [8] extend the discussion by examining the impact of inflation control on lease agreements in Ireland. Their study shows that overall mortgage rate increases decreased following regulatory interventions. More importantly, the study shows that the impact varies across segments of the rental market. These nuanced insights highlight the complex relationship between price controls and rents, suggesting that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be appropriate
Collectively, these studies help us comprehend the complex interactions between inflation and rent pricing. They show that the link is not constant but rather depends on things like geography, legal restrictions, and socioeconomic dynamics. These findings offer a basis for policymakers, economists, and stakeholders to make educated judgments on inflation and its effects on the housing market in the context of California's distinctive economic environment, where housing affordability is of fundamental concern.
2.3. GDP and Housing Market
The relationship between the GDP and the housing market is a multidimensional interplay that has received considerable study in economic literature. The GDP, a key metric of economic health, has a complex relationship with housing dynamics. A strengthening economy can lead to increased demand for homes, putting upward pressure on rent prices. A healthy housing market, on the other hand, can contribute significantly to GDP through construction activity, real estate transactions, and the other sectors that are intertwined with the housing sector.
According to Howard and Liebersohn [2], the desire to live in housing-supply-inelastic cities increases demand for housing, a phenomena that has a major impact on both GDP and housing affordability. Housing demand increases when cities become magnets for job opportunities and cultural facilities. As a result of the increased competition for housing units, prices rise, resulting not only in economic prosperity but also in housing affordability issues.
The symbiotic relationship between GDP and the housing market is best shown by California, a state known for its economic diversity. The importance of housing in California's economic environment is emphasized by Kholodilin [9] and O'Malley et al. [3]. The sizeable property market in the state has historically been crucial in determining economic outcomes. While California's booming economy drives up home demand, it also significantly boosts the state's GDP through the building, real estate, and other related sectors. Additionally, the study carried out by Samarin and Sharma [10] offer a typology of American metropolises based on rent burden and its causes. This typology emphasizes the different ways that housing dynamics affect different geographic areas, highlighting the various ways that housing and GDP are connected throughout the United States.
3. Method
The methodology used in this study requires the examination of several key variables to better understand the relationship between rental housing and various economic factors in California. These variables include the dependent variable, rent price (RP), defined as the average annual rental price in California. In addition, there are several independent variables: inflation (IR), gross domestic product (GDP), and vacancy rate (VR). A control variable, Population Growth (P), is also considered to account for its potential impact on rent prices.
3.1. Definition of the variables
Table 1: Variables
Variable | Type | Description | Source of Data |
Rent Price (RP) | Dependent | Rent Price is defined by the average annual rent price in California. | Department of Numbers Website https://www.deptofnumbers.com/rent/california/ |
Inflation Rate (IR) | Independent | This variable reflects the impact of changes in the general price level on rental prices. Inflation can contribute to an increase in rents due to rising costs. | State of California, Department of Industrial Relations https://www.dir.ca.gov/oprl/cpi/entireccpi.pdf |
GDP | Independent | GDP represents the economic output of California and influences the ability of residents to afford housing. | U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS https://www.bls.gov/eag/eag.ca.htm |
Vacancy Rate (VR) | Independent | The vacancy rate represents the availability of rental units in the market. | Department of Numbers Website https://www.deptofnumbers.com/rent/california/ |
Population Growth (P) | Control | Population growth plays a significant role in both demand and supply within the housing market. | Microtrends Website https://www.macrotrends.net/states/california/population |
3.2. Regression Model
The analytical framework adopted for this study involves a multiple linear regression model, expressed mathematically as follows:
\( RP=β0 +β1 (IR)+β2 (GDP)+β3 (VR)+β4 (P)+ε \)
3.3. Model Explanation: Economic Meaning of the Relationship
The statistical model adopted offers a comprehensive framework for analyzing the intricate relationship between inflation rate, GDP, vacancy rate, and population growth in California and their effect on the average annual rent price. Each coefficient (β) signifies the estimated impact on RP when there is a one-unit change in the corresponding independent variable, while keeping other factors constant. The main aim of this model is to elucidate the fluctuations in rental prices by considering the dynamic interplay of inflation rate, GDP, vacancy rate, and population growth. It provides a quantitative approach to understand the various factors influencing California's housing market and how they shape rental prices.
3.4. Hypotheses Formulation
The literature review has formed the basis for the formulation of the following hypotheses, which would be statistically tested, using STATA software.
1) H1: There is a relationship between IR and the average RP in California during the 21st century.
2) H2: There is a significant relationship between the GDP and RP in California during the 21st century.
3) H3: There is a significant relationship between the VR and the RP in California during the 21st century.
4) H4: There is a significant relationship between P and the RP in California during the 21st century.
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Statistics
In Table 2, the descriptive statistics provide a snapshot of the key variables in the study. The variable RP, representing the average annual rent price in California, has a mean of approximately 1313.5, with a standard deviation of 280.1254, indicating a considerable degree of variability in rental prices. The IR exhibits a mean of 2.875553, showcasing the average rate of change in prices over time. California's GDP demonstrates a mean of 2,171,934, reflecting the state's substantial economic output. The VR has a mean of 4.714583, suggesting the average proportion of unoccupied rental units. Population growth (P) displays a mean of approximately 37,200,000, illustrating the substantial population figures in California. These statistics provide essential insights into the central tendencies and variations within the dataset, forming the foundation for more in-depth analyses of the relationships between these variables.
Table 2: Descriptive Statistics
Variable | Obs | Mean | Std. Dev | Min | Max |
RP IR GDP VR P | 24 24 24 24 24 | 1313.5 2.875553 2171934 4.714583 3.72E+07 | 280.1254 1.526885 388450.4 0.9503728 1957115 | 960 -0.6230243 1574306 3.31 3.31E+07 | 1812 7.563887 2885627 6.6 3.95E+07 |
4.2. Regression Analysis
The regression model exhibits a robust fit, as evidenced by an R-squared value of 0.9516, indicating that approximately 95.16% of the variation in rent prices can be explained by the combination of inflation rate, GDP, vacancy rate, and population growth. The model is statistically significant, as denoted by the F-statistic (F(4, 9) = 93.33) with a probability of 0.0000. This suggests that at least one of the independent variables significantly contributes to the prediction of rent prices. The low root mean square error (Root MSE = 67.827) signifies a minimal difference between the observed and predicted values, emphasizing the model's accuracy in explaining the variations in rent prices.
Table 3: Model Summary
Number of Obs = 24 F(4, 9) = 93.33 Prob > F = 0.0000 R-squared = 0.9516 Adj R-squared = 0.9414 Root MSE = 67.827 |
The regression analysis was performed to establish the relationship between several key economic indicators and the RP in California during the 21st century. The following hypotheses were tested:
H1: There is a relationship between IR and RP in California.
The regression results reveal that the coefficient for IR is -25.2985, with a standard error of 14.5122, and a t-statistic of -1.74. The p-value associated with IR is 0.097, indicating that there is no statistically significant relationship between inflation rate and RP in California.
H2: There is a significant relationship between GDP and RP in California.
The coefficient for GDP is 0.0006648, with a standard error of 0.0001455, and a t-statistic of 4.57. The p-value for GDP is 0.000, suggesting a highly significant relationship between GDP and RP in California.
H3: There is a significant relationship between VR and RP in California.
The coefficient for VR is -15.43787, with a standard error of 17.74381, and a t-statistic of -0.87. The p-value for VR is 0.395, indicating that there is no statistically significant relationship between vacancy rate and RP in California.
H4: There is a significant relationship between P and RP in California.
The coefficient for P is 7.62E-06, with a standard error of 0.0000276, and a t-statistic of 0.28. The p-value for P is 0.785, demonstrating that there is no statistically significant relationship between population growth and RP in California.
Table 4: Regression Results
RP | Coef. | Std. Err. | t | P>|t| | [95% Conf. Interval] |
IR GDP VR P -cons | -25.2985 0.0006648 -15.43787 7.62E-06 -268.4156 | 14.5122 0.0001455 17.74381 0.0000276 775.382 | -1.74 4.57 -0.87 0.28 -0.35 | 0.097 0 0.395 0.785 0.733 | -55.67295.075881 0.000360.000969 -52.576121.70034 -5E-056.54E-05 -1891.311354.478 |
Overall, the regression analysis affirms that GDP has a significant positive relationship with rent prices in California. Conversely, IR, VR, and P do not appear to have statistically significant relationships with rent prices in the state during the specified time frame. These findings provide valuable insights into the dynamics of the California housing market and its sensitivity to economic changes.
4.3. Discussions
The results of the regression analysis clarified the complex relationship between economic factors and rent prices in California in the twenty-first century. The findings support past studies that suggested a link between economic expansion and the dynamics of the housing market, and also show a substantial relationship between GDP and RP. This result is in line with the finding made by O'Malley et al. [3] that a booming economy in California adds to increased housing demand, which could raise rent costs.
However, the study did not find a statistically significant link between IR and RP, contrary to predictions. This conclusion contradicts Thornberg et al.'s [1] claim that inflationary pressures can have an effect on rent pricing. The disparity might be linked to the uniqueness of California's economic environment and housing market dynamics, stressing the importance of regional research. Similarly, no significant association was found between VR and RP. This finding contradicts Chakrabarti and Zhang's [5] claim that housing affordability is related to employment growth, with increasing VR potentially leading to lower rent prices. The distinct elements impacting California's housing market could contribute to this disparity. Moreover, P demonstrated no statistically significant relationship with RP. This finding contradicts Anthony's [4] exploration of housing affordability and economic growth, which suggests that addressing population growth is essential for maintaining housing affordability. Again, the distinct characteristics of California's housing landscape may contribute to these differences.
The relationship established relationship between GDP and RP in this study underscores the importance of economic factors in shaping California's housing market. Policymakers should consider strategies to balance economic growth with housing affordability, ensuring that the benefits of prosperity are accessible to a broad spectrum of the population. While the study provides valuable insights, the nuanced nature of the housing market calls for ongoing research to refine understanding and inform targeted policy interventions.
5. Conclusion
The quantitative study sheds light on the complex relationship between economic variables and rent prices in twenty-first-century California. The findings highlight the strong impact of GDP on rent prices, highlighting the interdependence between economic growth and housing dynamics. The lack of statistically significant correlations between the Inflation Rate (IR), Vacancy Rate (VR), and Population Growth (P) and rent prices, on the other hand, emphasizes the complexities of California's housing market, which may depart from broader economic trends. These findings highlight the importance of regional housing policy solutions that take into account the state's distinct economic situation. Further research on the delicate interplay of elements impacting home affordability is encouraged to ensure that California's citizens may prosper in an ever-changing economic environment.
References
[1]. C. Thornberg, J. Levine, D. Schrader and E. Meux, "An Analysis of Rent Control Ordinances in California," y Beacon Economics LLC., pp. 1-21, 2016.
[2]. G. Howard and J. Liebersohn, "Why is the rent so darn high? The role of growing demand to live in housing-supply-inelastic cities," Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 124, p. 103369, 2021.
[3]. M. O'Malley, C. Alamo and B. Uhler, "California’s High Housing Costs: Causes and Consequences," LAO Publications, 2015.
[4]. J. Anthony, "Housing Affordability and Economic Growth," Housing Policy Debate, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1-22, 2022.
[5]. R. Chakrabarti and J. Zhang, "Unaffordable housing and local employment growth," Urban Studies, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1134-1151, 2015.
[6]. Z. Zainuddin and M. Rosylin, "Do Inflation, Interest Rate And Cost Of Renting Affect The Price Of Terrace Houses In Penang?," Planning Malaysia, vol. 18, no. 13, 2020.
[7]. N. Agarwal, R. Gao and M. Garner, "Renters, Rent Inflation and Renter Stress," Reserve Bank of Australia, 2023.
[8]. A. Ahrens, C. O’Toole and M. Martinez-Cillero, "Price Regulation, Inflation, And Nominal Rigidity In Housing Rents," Journal of Housing Economics, vol. 52, p. 101769, 2021.
[9]. K. Kholodilin, "Long-Term, Multicountry Perspective on Rental Market Regulations," Housing Policy Debate, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 994-1015, 2020.
[10]. M. Samarin and M. Sharma, "A typology of U.S. metropolises by rent burden and its major drivers," Geo Journal, p. 4887–4906, 2023.
Cite this article
Wan,H. (2024). Relationship Between Rent and the Overall Economy in 21st Century California. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,101,22-29.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. C. Thornberg, J. Levine, D. Schrader and E. Meux, "An Analysis of Rent Control Ordinances in California," y Beacon Economics LLC., pp. 1-21, 2016.
[2]. G. Howard and J. Liebersohn, "Why is the rent so darn high? The role of growing demand to live in housing-supply-inelastic cities," Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 124, p. 103369, 2021.
[3]. M. O'Malley, C. Alamo and B. Uhler, "California’s High Housing Costs: Causes and Consequences," LAO Publications, 2015.
[4]. J. Anthony, "Housing Affordability and Economic Growth," Housing Policy Debate, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1-22, 2022.
[5]. R. Chakrabarti and J. Zhang, "Unaffordable housing and local employment growth," Urban Studies, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1134-1151, 2015.
[6]. Z. Zainuddin and M. Rosylin, "Do Inflation, Interest Rate And Cost Of Renting Affect The Price Of Terrace Houses In Penang?," Planning Malaysia, vol. 18, no. 13, 2020.
[7]. N. Agarwal, R. Gao and M. Garner, "Renters, Rent Inflation and Renter Stress," Reserve Bank of Australia, 2023.
[8]. A. Ahrens, C. O’Toole and M. Martinez-Cillero, "Price Regulation, Inflation, And Nominal Rigidity In Housing Rents," Journal of Housing Economics, vol. 52, p. 101769, 2021.
[9]. K. Kholodilin, "Long-Term, Multicountry Perspective on Rental Market Regulations," Housing Policy Debate, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 994-1015, 2020.
[10]. M. Samarin and M. Sharma, "A typology of U.S. metropolises by rent burden and its major drivers," Geo Journal, p. 4887–4906, 2023.