Download pdf
Multi-Channel Supply Chains Considering Live Streaming Sales and Spillover Effects
- 1 School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, 66 Xuefu Avenue, Nanan District, Chongqing, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Abstract: With the rapid development of e-commerce, an increasing number of companies, such as Huawei, Apple, and Adidas, are no longer confined to offline physical stores for product sales. They leverage third-party e-commerce platforms or establish online stores on their official websites. Modern consumers have access to various purchasing channels, including e-commerce platforms, offline stores, and manufacturer direct sales. In recent years, a new e-commerce model, live streaming sales, has emerged. In live streaming sales, professional salespersons or key opinion leaders (KOLs) showcase product performance, aiming to sell products online. Unlike traditional online channels, live streaming sales alleviate new consumers' uncertainty about product information through real-time interaction or comments from KOLs. Live streaming has been adopted by e-commerce giants worldwide, such as Taobao, JD.com, and Amazon, due to its significant sales revenue potential. Additionally, channels with KOLs may generate negative or positive spillover effects on other channels. These effects are crucial parameters for exploring the impact of seller profits in the multi-channel supply chain under live streaming conditions. Both domestic and international research have focused on live streaming sales, multi-channel sales, and spillover effects, with many studies yielding significant economic and social benefits. However, challenges faced by multi-channel supply chains, including complex channel management, difficulty in information synchronization, brand consistency issues, and increased costs, need to be addressed. To overcome these challenges, recommendations include integrating channel resources, optimizing channel experience, establishing cross-channel data analysis systems, strengthening supply chain coordination, continuous innovation and improvement, and strengthening brand building.
Keywords
Keywords: Live streaming e-commerce, Multi-channel supply chain, KOL, Spillover effects
[1]. Pu X, Zhang S, Ji B. Online channel strategies under different offline channel power structures[J/OL]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2021, 60.
[2]. Zhen X, Xu S, Li Y. When and how should a retailer use third-party platform channels? The Impact of spillover effects[J/OL]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2022, 301(2): 624-637.
[3]. Hou J, Shen H, Xu F. A Model of Livestream Selling with Online Influencers[J/OL]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021[2024-01-05].
[4]. Pan R, Feng J, Zhan Z. Fly with the wings of live‐stream selling—Channel strategies with/without switching demand[J/OL]. Production and Operations Management, 2022, 31(9): 3387-3399.
[5]. Park H J, Lin L M. The effects of match-ups on the consumer attitudes toward internet celebrities and their live streaming contents in the context of product endorsement[J/OL]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2020, 52: 101934.
[6]. Zhang M, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. How to retain customers: Understanding the role of trust in live streaming commerce with a socio-technical perspective[J/OL]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2022, 127: 107052.
[7]. Xiong H, Chen J, Yan H. Pricing and coordination of dual-channel supply chain with live streaming sales considering anchor characteristics[J/OL]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 2023, 37(4): 188-195
[8]. Liu F J, Meng L, Chen S Y. The influence mechanism of online celebrity live streaming on consumer purchase intention[J]. Journal of Management Sciences, 2020, 17(1): 94-104.
[9]. Zhao B G, Wang Y F. The influence of e-commerce anchor characteristics on consumer purchase intention[J/OL]. Business Research, 2021(1): 1-6.
[10]. Pan R, Feng J, Zhao Z. Fly with the wings of live‐stream selling—Channel strategies with/without switching demand[J/OL]. Production and Operations Management, 2022, 31(9): 3387-3399.
[11]. Zhang W, Yu L, Wang Z. Live-streaming selling modes on a retail platform[J/OL]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2023, 173: 103096.
[12]. Cui X, Li Y, Li X. Livestream e-commerce in a platform supply chain: A product-fit uncertainty reduction perspective[J/OL]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2023, 258: 108796.
[13]. Lin Z B, Li Y W, Chen M F. Research on live marketing strategies in dual-channel supply chain[J]. Systems Science and Mathematics, 2023, 43(10): 2615-2629.
[14]. Sarkar A, Pal B. Competitive pricing strategies of multi channel supply chain under direct servicing by the manufacturer[J/OL]. RAIRO - Operations Research, 2021, 55: S1849-S1873.
[15]. Zhen X, Shi D, Tsai S B. Pricing Decisions of a Supply Chain with Multichannel Retailer under Fairness Concerns[J/OL]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 2019: 1-22.
[16]. Matsut K. When and What Wholesale and Retail Prices Should Be Set in Multi-Channel Supply Chains? E[J]. Eur. J. Oper. Res.(267): 540-554.
[17]. Wang R F, Hou P W, Zheng W. Pricing decisions of multi-channel sales considering heterogeneous consumer channel preferences[J]. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 2023, 40(4): 559-575.
[18]. Zhang X, Zhang J. Pricing and selection strategies of e-commerce supply chain under live streaming background[J]. Journal of Systems Management, 2023, 1-22. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/31.1977.N.20231019.0945.002
[19]. Xu J P, Feng R, You X L. Multi-channel retail mode selection strategy considering consumer channel preferences[J]. Systems Science and Mathematics: 1-13. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2019.O1.20231130.0942.002
[20]. Ma D Q, Wang X Q, Hu J S. Selection of platform-type supply chain sales models considering consumer reverse showrooming phenomenon under multi-channel retailing[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Management Science: 1-12. DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0806
[21]. Liu Y Z, Hu Z Y, Tang D N. Study on consumers' online channel migration willingness in multi-channel retail environment based on SOR theory model[J/OL]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences), 2022, 43(1): 38-49.
[22]. Liang X, Zhang D. Research on pricing and retailer promotion strategies in multi-channel supply chain considering consumer free-riding behavior and other complex factors[J/OL]. Price: Theory and Practice, 2020(10): 127-130+178.
[23]. Xia J, Niu W. Adding clicks to bricks: An analysis of supplier encroachment under service spillovers[J/OL]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2019, 37: 100876.
[24]. Wu H. Contingent channel strategies for combating brand spillover in a co-opetitive supply chain[J/OL]. Transportation Research Part e: Logistics and Transportation Review, 164, 102830.[2024-01-04].
[25]. Wang T, Yan B. Research on online channel coordination based on channel spillover effects[J]. Operations Research and Management, 2022, 31(12): 173-178.
[26]. Li W, Li K, An G. Study on decision-making of dual-channel supply chain considering channel power and negative service spillover effects[J]. Journal of Management Sciences, 2017, 14(5): 767-774.
[27]. Abhishek V, Jerath, Zhang Z J. Agency Selling or Reselling? Channel Structures in Electronic Retailing[J/OL]. Management Science, 2016, 62(8): 2259-2280.
[28]. Zhen X, Xu S, Lo Y, et al. When and how should a retailer use third-party platform channels? The Impact of spillover effects[J/OL]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2022, 301(2): 624-637.
Cite this article
Wang,K. (2024).Multi-Channel Supply Chains Considering Live Streaming Sales and Spillover Effects.Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,122,26-31.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Economic Management and Green Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).