Research Article
Open access
Published on 29 November 2024
Download pdf
Li,H. (2024). The Relevance of M2 and GDP: Comparative Analysis of US, China, and Japan. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,111,70-77.
Export citation

The Relevance of M2 and GDP: Comparative Analysis of US, China, and Japan

Haoyang Li *,1,
  • 1 Huili School Hangzhou, Xue Zhi Road, Hangzhou, China

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.17747

Abstract

In the circumstances of the post-pandemic period, a lot of economic bodies are facing the problem of economic recession. Meanwhile, monetary policy is playing a key role in the restoration of economic growth. This paper will do an overview of the current monetary policy and economic situation of three countries (namely, the US, China, and Japan), then investigate and decide the monetary policy that should be applied by different countries. To solve the problem, this paper will use the Granger Causality test to test how the currency supply and the GDP of a country will correlate and affect each other. This paper will collect data from the FRED from these countries, dated from 1999 to 2024. This paper will also collect an analysis of the current economic policies and discuss whether they are effective or not. After the analysis, it could be reached to a conclusion that the M2 of China and Japan is the Granger cause of the GDP of the two countries, while the US has an opposite trend, where the GDP of the US is the Granger cause of the US’s M2. To push this investigation further, researchers could investigate the result of the test at different periods so that a dynamic conclusion could be reached.

Keywords

Monetary Policy, US, China, Japan, Granger Causality test.

[1]. Dell’Ariccia, G., Rabanal, P., & Sandri, D. (2018). Unconventional monetary policies in the euro area, Japan, and the United Kingdom. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 147-172.

[2]. Board of Governors (2021). M2 Monetary Aggregate. Retrieved from https://www.stlouisfed.org/financial-crisis/data/m2-monetary-aggregate. Accessed June 29, 2024.

[3]. Word Bank Group (2024). GDP (current US$) – China, US, Japan. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator. Accessed June 29, 2024.

[4]. Ogunsanwo, O. F., Adelugba, I. A., Efuntade, A. O., & Ajoloko, M. O. (2023). Effects of financial market intermediation on economic growth in Nigeria. Journal of Developing Areas, 57(2), 51-64.

[5]. Wang, Y. (2023). Long-run Effects of monetary policy of China on its economic growth. The Chinese Economy, 56(6), 431-440.

[6]. Federal Reserve Bank (2024). M2. FRED. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/searchresults/?st=m2&isTst=1. Accessed June 29, 2024.

[7]. Cai, W. (2020). Financialization, economic structure change, and the USA–China Trade War. World Review of Political Economy, 11(2), 256–269.

[8]. Congressional Research Service (2021). The Federal Reserve’s response to COVID-19: Policy issues. Congressman ED Case. Retrieved from https://case.house.gov/uploadedfiles/r46411_fed_reserve.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2024.

[9]. Kennedy, S., & Wang, Y. (2021). Cheap talk: China’s central bank still struggles to speak to markets. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep28767. Accessed June 29, 2024.

[10]. Wang, Y. (2023). Long-run effects of monetary policy of China on its economic growth. Chinese Economy, 56(6), 431–440.

[11]. Bank of Japan (2024). Outlook for economic activity and prices (January 2024). Retrieved from https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor2401a.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2024.

[12]. Bao, H. H. G., Le, H. P., Nguyen, B. H., & Vu, T. A. (2023). The US dollar and trade balance: New findings from the international trade of India with the European Union. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2235817.

[13]. Word Bank Group (2024). Population ages 0-14 (% of total population). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.0014.TO.ZS?skipRedirection=true&view=map. Accessed June 29, 2024.

[14]. Leightner, J. E. (2024). How US fiscal and monetary policy affect the GDP of countries with fixed and flexible exchange rates. Journal of Economic Integration, 39(1), 86-106.

Cite this article

Li,H. (2024). The Relevance of M2 and GDP: Comparative Analysis of US, China, and Japan. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,111,70-77.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Economic Management and Green Development

Conference website: https://2024.icemgd.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-611-2(Print) / 978-1-83558-612-9(Online)
Conference date: 26 September 2024
Editor:Lukáš Vartiak
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.111
ISSN:2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).