1. Introduction
Founded in the 1960s by Dudley Craven, Ken Bran, and Ken Underwood, Marshall became a renowned name in the audio equipment industry, known for its high-quality guitar amplifiers, speaker cabinets, and personal audio devices [1][2]. Marshall's inception was driven by the need for superior, cost-effective alternatives to American guitar amplifiers
Marshall Amplification, a pioneer in the audio equipment industry, is known for its wide array of products including amplifiers, speaker cabinets, headphones, and earbuds. It also operates the Marshall Records label. Conceived in London by Jim Marshall, the company set out to solve guitarists' complaints about the power and sound of existing amplifiers. Marshall's distinct sound, characterized by a unique sizzling distortion, along with their innovative and high-quality product lines, have allowed them to maintain relevance despite advancements in digital audio technology.
The company's market position is a testament to its exceptional leadership, marketing strategy, and strategic human resources. Despite facing challenges such as the varying adoption of smart speakers across different regions, the company has managed to keep a stronghold in the market. Nonetheless, as digital media contexts evolve, and the sonic experience is continuously redefined, Marshall continues to confront obstacles. Understanding these challenges, in conjunction with the dynamic nature of today's technical landscapes, is vital in mapping the company's journey thus far, and envisaging its future trajectory.
This essay will delve into various facets of Marshall Amplification, scrutinising its leadership, organisational culture, market position, marketing strategy, and strategic human resources. A comprehensive understanding of these elements will be indispensable in dissecting the corporation's trajectory in the ever-evolving global market.
2. Leadership and organisational culture
The role of leadership and culture is paramount in shaping the trajectory of organisations[3][4]. Critical to this understanding is the shift in perspective from leadership as an individual-focused phenomenon to a more collective process, one that encapsulates a dynamic interplay of roles between a leader and the team. This participative leadership style is particularly crucial to Marshall Amplification, given its wide range of operations.
Marshall's principal operations encompass the sale and repair of new and used automobiles, facilitated through a network of 106 franchisees, operating under 23 different brands spread across 84 sites in 27 English counties [5]. Additionally, the group manages five independent body shops, three used vehicle lots, five trade parts specialists, and one pre-delivery inspection facility. As a result, managing such a wide-ranging, multifaceted operation requires a leadership approach that is democratic and inclusive, inviting contributions from various team members across the organisational hierarchy.
Participative leadership, the style adopted by the CEO of Marshall, is grounded in the principle of shared decision-making [6]. It prioritises open communication, fostering an environment where the perspectives and insights of team members are valued, and their inputs are factored into the decision-making process. As Arnold[7] point out, this style of leadership involves adopting members' knowledge and incorporating it into decision-making. This inclusive leadership approach can impact both performance and employee satisfaction within the organisation. Performance, as defined by Arnold , includes both financial and nonfinancial rewards and is related to the satisfaction of main rivals and business growth. Historical data may present conflicting views on the correlation between participative leadership and performance [8]. However, the discourse emphasises the need to understand the impact of involving employees in group decision-making on organisational performance. In addition, this leadership style potentially enhances employee satisfaction by recognising and affirming their contributions. As DeRue and Ashford[9] suggests, leadership is a socially constructed identity, shaped by mutual recognition and endorsement from both team members and the broader organisation. This participative approach to leadership, therefore, not only serves to optimise operational efficiency but also engenders a positive organisational culture by promoting collaboration and mutual respect.
Organisational culture, commonly defined as the shared beliefs, values, practises, and customs within an enterprise, is a crucial factor in determining how a business operates and develops [10] It not only shapes the identity of an organisation as a whole, but also has a significant impact on employee conduct, job satisfaction, and overall performance .
Marshall Amplification's organisational culture is profoundly entrenched in the company's history as an innovative audio equipment manufacturer . This culture of innovation is pervasive throughout their diverse network of operations, encouraging team members' continuous learning, adaptability, and creativity . This is evident by the range of products they offer, which includes amplifiers, personal headphones, speaker enclosures, and earbuds. The culture encourages employees to perpetually stretch the limits of audio technology and be inventive in their respective positions. Additionally, the organisational culture of Marshall is inherently customer-centric [11]. The company's mission is to produce superior audio products that not only satisfy but exceed consumer expectations . This emphasis on customer fulfilment fosters a culture of excellence and high performance, thereby motivating employees to provide the highest quality products and services. Collaboration is an integral element of the company's ethos, reflecting the CEO's participative leadership approach [12]. Employees across departments and hierarchical levels are encouraged to share their ideas and expertise, nurturing a culture of inclusiveness and shared decision-making [13][14]. This culture promotes mutual respect and values intellectual diversity, thereby increasing employee engagement and satisfaction. Marshall's organisational culture also embraces a commitment to environmentally conscious, sustainable practises [15]. Instilling in its employees a sense of social responsibility, the company seeks to strike a balance between its operations and efforts to reduce its environmental impact. To summarise, the organisational culture of Marshall Amplification is a dynamic blend of innovation, customer focus, collaboration, and sustainability. This culture plays a vital role in guiding strategic decisions, influencing employee conduct, and ultimately contributing to the overall success of the company.
3. Market analysis
3.1. Demand and supply of products and services
To understand Marshall's market position, it is vital to analyse the interplay of demand and supply regarding their products and services. This examination elucidates how varying prices can affect consumer demand and the company's willingness to supply products.
Price plays a crucial role in influencing the consumer's propensity to purchase. An inverse relationship, as can be seen in Figure 1 (from week one lecture, page 10), exists between price and demand [16]. In Figure 1, by using the sale of Blu-rays as an example, it is evident that as the price decreases, the demand quantity increases. This relationship is pivotal for Marshall's high-cost products like speaker cabinets, headphones, and earphones. With a strong market presence and a significant customer base, even a slight reduction in prices could result in a substantial increase in sales. This strategy could be employed during festivals like Black Friday or Christmas, providing discounts to stimulate consumer demand.
Figure 1: The relationship between price and demand (Figure taken from lecture of week one page 10)
The market also sees an interplay between substitute goods and the original products. An increase in the price of a substitute good can lead to a rise in demand for the original good [17]. This phenomenon is depicted in Figure 2, where an increase in the price of substitute products results in an augmented supply of the original good. In response to these market dynamics, Marshall strategically aligns its prices with similar high-ranking products in the market. This approach facilitates competitiveness and ensures that Marshall maintains its strong market position, despite the fluctuations in the pricing of substitute goods.
However, complementing products also significantly impact demand, as can be seen in Figure 2 [18][19] For example, selling earphone cases separately or offering special series such as collaborations with other brands could attract additional customers and increase sales[20].
Figure 2: The influence of complementary good and substitute good (Figure taken from [21])
To conclude, the dynamics of demand and supply, especially their responsiveness to price changes, significantly affect Marshall's product pricing and overall business strategy.
3.2. Marketing strategy
3.2.1. Product
Marshall's portfolio mainly includes music amplifiers, speaker cabinets, headphones, and drums, with amplifiers as their flagship product . Their marketing strategy is innovation-focused, continually updating products to lead the market. Starting in the 1950s and 1960s, Marshall used UK-sourced parts to cut costs, creating a unique, aggressive amplifier sound . Over time, they transitioned from hand wiring to printed circuit boards for more efficient production, introduced special edition amplifiers, and continued evolving their products. Today, their amplifiers blend modern and vintage designs, maintaining the signature Marshall "roar" .
The product strategy of Marshall capitalises on the company's legacy in music amplifiers and on-going innovation. Marshall has remained relevant and competitive in the marketplace by continually updating their product line and integrating a combination of modern designs and vintage reissues. This strategy satisfies both their loyal customers who prefer their classic models and their new customers who are attracted to innovative products. Marshall has a competitive advantage due to the distinctive sound and high quality of their products, which are the result of their proprietary technological innovations However, there are hazards associated with this strategy. Continuous product innovation necessitates substantial R&D expenditures and entails the risk of unsuccessful product launches. To justify the risks and costs associated with the introduction of new products, Marshall must ensure that they are in line with evolving market demands.
3.2.2. Promotion
Marshall's promotional strategies extend beyond the realm of product manufacturing. The brand has made significant investments in sports sponsorships, establishing Marshall Records, and creating public amenities like large arenas and recording studios. In 2017, Marshall Amplification announced the launch of a record label, Marshall Records, signalling its foray into music distribution [22]. The brand set up an office at Tileyard Studios, London, and partnered with Alternative Distribution Alliance, a Warner Music Group-owned distributor supporting independent record labels. Moreover, Marshall Amplification secured a naming agreement with Arena MK (located at Stadium MK in Milton Keynes) in September 2018 to facilitate its usage for musical performances. The first performance at this venue was scheduled to be the Black-Eyed Peas [23]. These promotional initiatives exemplify how Marshall Amplification leverages diverse channels for brand visibility and customer engagement.
The promotional strategy of Marshall, especially their forays into sports sponsorships and music distribution, demonstrates their dedication to diversification. This comprehensive strategy expands their consumer base and raises their brand's visibility across multiple industries. However, as with any strategy for diversification, there are hazards to consider. Too much diversification away from their core competency can dilute their brand and confound their consumers. Additionally, new ventures such as Marshall Records require substantial investment capital, and there is no assurance that they will be profitable. Marshall must continue investing in the promotion of their primary product line while pursing these new promotional channels.
4. Strategic human resources
The role of strategic human resources in the success of Marshall cannot be overstated. One critical area where HR plays an indispensable role is in motivating employees to foster commitment and increase productivity. Marshall employs various strategies in line with Maslow's hierarchy of needs, a motivational theory explored in week 6's lecture.
Abraham Maslow's theory suggests that individuals have five distinct types of needs: physiological, security, belongingness, esteem, and self-actualization, that must be satisfied in the stated order . While this theory has its limitations - levels of needs aren't always present, the order of importance varies among individuals, and cultural differences can influence the order and salience of needs - its principles provide a sound basis for the creation of motivational strategies in the workplace .
Marshall's HR practices display a deep alignment with Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory in numerous ways. On the physiological needs level, which Maslow posits as the most fundamental, Marshall ensures that employees' basic needs are adequately met . This is evident in their provision of fair salaries and the establishment of manageable work hours where it was observed that employees were not compelled to work overtime. In catering to the security needs, Marshall has created an organizational culture that places a premium on safety. The company has put measures in place to focus on internal network security management, thereby ensuring the protection of critical business information and maintaining a physically secure environment for its employees. Marshall also attends to the belongingness needs of its employees by fostering a positive and supportive work environment. They extend benefits such as free hot drinks and parking facilities for their staff. However, there's room for improvement in reassessing their target setting practices to relieve employees of undue pressure and enhance job satisfaction. When it comes to esteem needs, Marshall respects and values the voice of its employees, allowing them to freely express their thoughts and requests. This practice demonstrates an appreciation for their contributions. Nevertheless, they should further solidify their strategies to prevent incidents like workplace harassment that could negatively affect the company's image and stock value, as suggested by Borelli-Kjaer, Schack and Nielsson. Finally, regarding self-actualization needs, feedback from employees indicates a need for Marshall to improve. Specifically, employees seek clearer pathways for skill development and the realization of their personal career goals. One potential solution could be to implement a mentoring system, pairing newer employees with more experienced ones. This practice would provide a learning opportunity for the new hires while allowing the experienced staff to enhance their leadership skills.
Strategies enhancing employee satisfaction boost productivity and profitability. However, Marshall should adjust its growth opportunities to reduce turnover and boost morale. Also, promoting respect and security at work can mitigate reputational risks. Thus, Marshall's focus on refining HR practices to uplift employee motivation is key to its competitive advantage.
5. Recommendations and conclusions
The analysis of Marshall Amplification provides a comprehensive overview of the organisation's leadership approach, organisational culture, market analysis, and strategic human resources. As demonstrated, Marshall's participative leadership style and its associated organisational culture are integral to managing its vast operational landscape. The CEO's democratic approach of including team members in decision-making processes fosters an environment of collaboration and mutual respect. The organisational culture, deeply embedded in innovation, customer focus, collaboration, and sustainability, drives the company's strategic decisions, influences employee behaviour, and contributes to the company's overall success.
Based on the above analysis, the following recommendations are proposed for Marshall Amplification:
1. Leadership and organisational culture: Continue to foster a culture of participative leadership, ensuring that team members from across the operational hierarchy feel valued and heard.
2. Market analysis: Marshall should closely monitor market dynamics, customer preferences, and competitor activities to maintain a strong market position. Special attention should be given to the pricing strategy during festival seasons to stimulate consumer demand.
3. Marketing strategy: Marshall should maintain a balanced approach between innovation and the reissue of classic models to cater to a broad consumer base.
In conclusion, by continuing to promote a participative leadership style, ensuring a diverse product and promotional strategy, and enhancing its HR practices, Marshall Amplification will be well-positioned to maintain its competitive advantage and drive continued success.
References
[1]. Lerner, M. (1939) ‘John Marshall and the Campaign of History’, Colum. L. Rev., 39, p. 396.
[2]. Twyman, R.W. (1954) History of Marshall Field and Co., 1852-1906. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[3]. Buch, K. and Rivers, D. (2001) ‘TQM: the role of leadership and culture’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal [Preprint].
[4]. Ruchlin, H.S. et al. (2004) ‘The role of leadership in instilling a culture of safety: lessons from the literature’, Journal of Healthcare Management, 49(1), p. 47.
[5]. Marshall (2022) History 30TH ANNIVERSARY SER. Available at: https://marshall.com/live-for-music/history/history-of-30th-anniversary-series.
[6]. Lam, C.K., Huang, X. and Chan, S.C.H. (2015) ‘The threshold effect of participative leadership and the role of leader information sharing’, Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), pp. 836–855.
[7]. Arnold, J.A. et al. (2000) ‘The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors’, Journal of organizational behavior, 21(3), pp. 249–269.
[8]. Huang, X. et al. (2010) ‘Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non‐managerial subordinates’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), pp. 122–143.
[9]. DeRue, D.S. and Ashford, S.J. (2010) ‘Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations’, Academy of management review, 35(4), pp. 627–647.
[10]. Willcoxson, L. and Millett, B. (2000) ‘The management of organisational culture’, Australian Journal of Management and Organisational Behaviour, 3(2), pp. 91–99.
[11]. Osarenkhoe, A. (2006) ‘Customer-centric strategy: a longitudinal study of implementation of a customer relationship management solution’, International Journal of Technology Marketing, 1(2), pp. 115–144.
[12]. Kożuch, B. (2009) ‘The culture of collaboration: theoretical aspects’, Journal of intercultural management, 1(2).
[13]. Jarratt, D. and O’Neill, G. (2002) ‘The effect of organisational culture on business-to-business relationship management practice and performance’, Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 10(3), pp. 21–40.
[14]. Tuurnas, S. et al. (2019) ‘Towards collaborative development culture in local government organisations’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(6), pp. 582–599.
[15]. Argument, L., Lettice, F. and Bhamra, T. (1998) ‘Environmentally conscious design: matching industry requirements with academic research’, Design Studies, 19(1), pp. 63–80.
[16]. Lau, A.H.-L. and Lau, H.-S. (1988) ‘The newsboy problem with price-dependent demand distribution’, IIE transactions, 20(2), pp. 168–175.
[17]. Milgrom, P. and Strulovici, B. (2009) ‘Substitute goods, auctions, and equilibrium’, Journal of Economic theory, 144(1), pp. 212–247.
[18]. Sengupta, S. (1998) ‘Some approaches to complementary product strategy’, Journal of Product Innovation Management: AN INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION OF THE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 15(4), pp. 352–367.
[19]. Cenamor, J., Usero, B. and Fernández, Z. (2013) ‘The role of complementary products on platform adoption: Evidence from the video console market’, Technovation, 33(12), pp. 405–416.
[20]. Borelli-Kjaer, M., Schack, L.M. and Nielsson, U. (2021) ‘# MeToo: Sexual harassment and company value’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, p. 101875.
[21]. Surbhi, S. (2021) Difference Between Substitute Goods and Complementary Goods. Available at: https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-substitute-goods-and-complementary-goods.html.
[22]. Alvarez, P. (2018) ‘Marshall Amplifier Emulation’.
[23]. The Newsroom (2018) Welcome to the Marshall Arena in Milton Keynes. Milton Keynes Citizen. Available at: https://www.miltonkeynes.co.uk/news/welcome-marshall-arena-milton-keynes-571207.
Cite this article
Zhou,X. (2024). Analysis of Marshall Amplification about Its Leadership, Culture, Market Analysis, Marketing Strategy and Strategic Human Resources. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,136,1-7.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Lerner, M. (1939) ‘John Marshall and the Campaign of History’, Colum. L. Rev., 39, p. 396.
[2]. Twyman, R.W. (1954) History of Marshall Field and Co., 1852-1906. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[3]. Buch, K. and Rivers, D. (2001) ‘TQM: the role of leadership and culture’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal [Preprint].
[4]. Ruchlin, H.S. et al. (2004) ‘The role of leadership in instilling a culture of safety: lessons from the literature’, Journal of Healthcare Management, 49(1), p. 47.
[5]. Marshall (2022) History 30TH ANNIVERSARY SER. Available at: https://marshall.com/live-for-music/history/history-of-30th-anniversary-series.
[6]. Lam, C.K., Huang, X. and Chan, S.C.H. (2015) ‘The threshold effect of participative leadership and the role of leader information sharing’, Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), pp. 836–855.
[7]. Arnold, J.A. et al. (2000) ‘The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors’, Journal of organizational behavior, 21(3), pp. 249–269.
[8]. Huang, X. et al. (2010) ‘Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non‐managerial subordinates’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), pp. 122–143.
[9]. DeRue, D.S. and Ashford, S.J. (2010) ‘Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations’, Academy of management review, 35(4), pp. 627–647.
[10]. Willcoxson, L. and Millett, B. (2000) ‘The management of organisational culture’, Australian Journal of Management and Organisational Behaviour, 3(2), pp. 91–99.
[11]. Osarenkhoe, A. (2006) ‘Customer-centric strategy: a longitudinal study of implementation of a customer relationship management solution’, International Journal of Technology Marketing, 1(2), pp. 115–144.
[12]. Kożuch, B. (2009) ‘The culture of collaboration: theoretical aspects’, Journal of intercultural management, 1(2).
[13]. Jarratt, D. and O’Neill, G. (2002) ‘The effect of organisational culture on business-to-business relationship management practice and performance’, Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 10(3), pp. 21–40.
[14]. Tuurnas, S. et al. (2019) ‘Towards collaborative development culture in local government organisations’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(6), pp. 582–599.
[15]. Argument, L., Lettice, F. and Bhamra, T. (1998) ‘Environmentally conscious design: matching industry requirements with academic research’, Design Studies, 19(1), pp. 63–80.
[16]. Lau, A.H.-L. and Lau, H.-S. (1988) ‘The newsboy problem with price-dependent demand distribution’, IIE transactions, 20(2), pp. 168–175.
[17]. Milgrom, P. and Strulovici, B. (2009) ‘Substitute goods, auctions, and equilibrium’, Journal of Economic theory, 144(1), pp. 212–247.
[18]. Sengupta, S. (1998) ‘Some approaches to complementary product strategy’, Journal of Product Innovation Management: AN INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION OF THE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 15(4), pp. 352–367.
[19]. Cenamor, J., Usero, B. and Fernández, Z. (2013) ‘The role of complementary products on platform adoption: Evidence from the video console market’, Technovation, 33(12), pp. 405–416.
[20]. Borelli-Kjaer, M., Schack, L.M. and Nielsson, U. (2021) ‘# MeToo: Sexual harassment and company value’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, p. 101875.
[21]. Surbhi, S. (2021) Difference Between Substitute Goods and Complementary Goods. Available at: https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-substitute-goods-and-complementary-goods.html.
[22]. Alvarez, P. (2018) ‘Marshall Amplifier Emulation’.
[23]. The Newsroom (2018) Welcome to the Marshall Arena in Milton Keynes. Milton Keynes Citizen. Available at: https://www.miltonkeynes.co.uk/news/welcome-marshall-arena-milton-keynes-571207.