1. Introduction
Design is the process of conceptualizing, planning, and calculating, an act of creativity undertaken by humans to achieve a specific goal. With the evolution of techniques, materials, and tools, technology has a direct impact on the creators of design.
The relationship between technology and design is clear: they complement and promote each other. Furthermore, good design represents a harmonious unity of art and science. Technology provides design with new materials and methods. More importantly, since the design is focused on real users, it becomes a means of media between technology and the public, guiding users and providing feedback to the tech, facilitating its iterative improvement.
At the highly anticipated WWDC 2023, Apple unveiled its much-discussed mixed-reality headset, the Apple Vision Pro. The technology behind it is highly advanced, featuring Apple's M2 and R1 chips, along with numerous sensors and cameras. This device offers a new experience that preserves a sense of the real world while allowing users to seamlessly transition into a fully virtual space [1]. Vision Pro blends virtual and real elements in a unique way, with the experience centered around the user’s interaction in space, defining a new interaction logic. This design concept represents a revolution in research that aids human social development [2].
As demonstrated by this example, both design and technology are indispensable in the creation of new products. However, analyzing only from individual products and their development processes leads to narrow conclusions and fails to explore the fundamental relationship between design and technology from a broader perspective.
Therefore, expanding the research scope, this paper shifts focus from the individual product to the macro enterprise market which manufactures products. It moves beyond analyzing the outcomes of specific stages to examine the essential goals of product iteration and development. Products represent each phase of the design process, while the macro perspective of the enterprise market encompasses research and development, manufacturing, and application services, all of which need to integrate considerations of economic, social, and ecological factors under new modes of design. The fundamental goal of the ongoing evolution of design and technology that brings transformative change to society is, in fact, innovation.
Based on this reasoning, this paper expands the research object from the "design phase" to the "design goal" from the designer's perspective. The core research objective is to analyze how design and technology lead innovation in the current information era. By exploring the process of technological and design innovation, this paper aims to discuss the prospects and potential development of innovative design in the new era and offer possible suggestions for advancing industrial revolutions, economic transformation, and even societal progress in the future.
2. Innovation-Driven Models
2.1. Concepts of Innovation
Innovation comes in many forms and is applied across various industries and fields. To classify different types of innovation, industry professionals categorize innovation from the perspective of products and services into two main types: incremental innovation and Radical Innovation [3].
Incremental innovation is the traditional form of innovation, characterized by small, continuous changes and improvements. It has a larger market and lower risks, so as to make straightforward profitability. On the other hand, radical innovation is radical and groundbreaking. According to the theory proposed by Kristina B. Dahlin and Dean M. Behrens, Radical Innovation must meet three criteria: novelty (different from the past), uniqueness (different from the present), and practicality (successfully adopted) [4]. The innovation of shared bicycles, which popularized the idea of public-sharing products, conveyed the concept to users that services could be shared publicly, allowing them to enjoy the service without the need for ownership and addressing short-distance travel issues [3].
Successful radical innovations are rare, typically occurring every five to ten years, but their impact is often profound, that could disrupted one or more industries and created new consumer markets.
2.2. Limitations of the Incremental Innovation-Driven Model
The market-driven model follows the current social and cultural paradigm, focusing on meeting user needs or highlighting unique product features to attract users. It primarily manifests as the incremental optimization of the practicality and applicability of existing products. Consequently, this type of innovation is prone to imitation and often ends up in a passive position.
The technology-driven model emphasizes a technology-led approach, leveraging breakthroughs in technical fields to achieve radical innovation in product functionality. The invention of the Segway Personal Transporter employed "Dynamic Stabilization" tech and used embedded precision solid-state gyroscopes to allow motors to maintain balance [5].
Technological knowledge barriers can help enterprises establish a strong and exclusive competitive advantage [4]. However, achieving radical technological breakthroughs often requires high R&D investment within the industry or the organization. So implementing technology-led innovation is often challenging and, in most cases, remains in a reactive position.
2.3. Radical Innovation-Driven Model
Radical innovation is often characterized as radical or capability-destroying, or as a breakthrough. All these labels share a common concept: radical innovation signifies discontinuity with the past.
The current radical innovation-driven model is the design-driven model, regarded as a third strategic paradigm for innovation alongside technology-driven and market-driven models. This model posits that, beyond "technology" and "market," there is a critical body of knowledge that drives innovation—"meaning." The core objective of this model is to create new intrinsic meanings for products (the "product language"), requiring the redefinition of products and the assignment of new intrinsic attributes [4].
3. Design innovation-driven model
3.1. Typical Case of Design-Driven Innovation
Apple Inc. is regarded as “a beacon of design-driven enterprises” in the modern era. In its pursuit of creating radical products, the company has undergone various historical stages of "innovation power" struggles and transformations, eventually establishing an innovation culture centered on design as its core strategy. However, Apple did not embrace this idea at its inception. Through repeated setbacks and changes, the company ultimately presented a design-driven model to the public. This transition marked a significant shift from a "technology-first" geek mindset to a "human-centered" design philosophy [6].
Apple's transformation in company orientation highlights its adoption of design as an overarching driving force, achieving leapfrog innovation [7]. By embracing human-centered thinking, Apple redirected its design focus from purely technological solutions to user-oriented solutions. Leveraging existing technologies (or acquiring them) to enhance user experience and product performance exemplifies a method that balances technical and strategic feasibility to meet user needs.
3.2. Design-Driven Innovation Model
The design-driven innovation model is an innovation approach led by design activities. It does not focus on mastering a unique new technology, but rather on the creative integration and application of existing technological and social elements.
On the demand side, it goes beyond traditional market or customer categories urging innovators to pay attention to the development of broader social and cultural trends. This enables them to accurately grasp potential needs and subsequently guide market demand. On the technical side: it does not require companies to develop new tech but focuses on the application or secondary development of existing technologies to create new product functions [8].
Design-driven innovation emphasizes a dual approach—products-individuals and products-society—creating new concepts and visions while imbuing products with new intrinsic meanings. From a social perspective, meaning construction involves an "interpreter network" (talents from various industries) to interact and integrate new product meanings and values that are co-created [1]. From an individual perspective, it is essential to embrace human-centered thinking.
3.2.1. Meaning Construction in Design-Driven Innovation
Art historian John Heskett stated that design is about "understanding objects," and the ways it shapes and creates objects fulfill our needs and imbue our lives with meaning [9]. In a sense, the essence of the logic of design lies in endowing products with new intrinsic meanings and creating new entities.
Design-driven innovation introduced firstly the product's "intrinsic meaning." It emphasizes the role of social and cultural contexts in the innovative design of intrinsic meanings, covering four aspects: economic significance, social significance, strategic significance, and future significance.
3.2.2. User Experience in Design-Driven Innovation
Recognizing and understanding new social and cultural paradigms also requires adopting a humanistic perspective to observe consumer and market demand trends. This approach elevates the goal from merely meeting to leading user needs and adheres to being human-centered and user-focused in market demand orientation.
The core logic of design-driven innovation is being people-oriented, employing a "user experience-centered" design mindset. As the definitions evolve, experience design has become the core competitive strength within the design-driven model [10].
3.3. Operational Process of the Design-Driven Model
As illustrated, the business process under the design-driven model follows three steps: defining the concept, analyzing user feedback, and integrating internal and external resources.
The first two steps can serve to reinforce the creation process of products within the design-driven model by connecting cultural and technological knowledge. In the process of innovative design, opening and cooperation are the most critical keywords. Companies establish mature cross-departmental collaboration practices and rules internally. Guided by this idea, leading experts across various fields will form interdisciplinary collaborative innovation platforms in future societies.
These platforms will facilitate the integration of diverse resources and establish an open co-creation model that combines internal management with external collaboration, which finally enables the realization of innovative visions into practical products and services.
3.4. Co-Creation Based on Collaboration
3.4.1. Integrating the Co-Creation Concept
One of Apple’s key innovation characteristics weakens and blurs organizational boundaries, promoting knowledge exchange and sharing between internal and external stakeholders. Ultimately, centered on the core objective of innovating intrinsic product meanings, design-driven innovation emphasizes leading innovation through internal management and achieving proprietary collaborative ecosystems through external collaboration. This enables the organic integration of societal culture with technical craftsmanship, achieving shared meaning creation and strategic product development goals [12]. The specific process can be outlined along two key threads [4]:
The interpreter network drives innovation based on societal and cultural knowledge. Through design narratives, cultural production forms new concepts and visions, which are then translated into product meanings. These meanings are communicated to consumers via a new and specific product language, fostering their perception of the new meaning.
The interpreter network facilitates technical and finishing innovations to form new functions. If a “Technology Epiphanies” occurs, consumer feedback can be integrated and optimized. This process culminates in the final product form and presents it through a specific product language and its physical manifestation.
4. Design-Driven and Innovation-Driven Approaches
The intersection of technology-driven innovation and design-driven innovation enables a dual disruptive transformation in product performance and intrinsic meaning, referred to as Technology Epiphanies [3]. Achieving breakthroughs in both technology-driven and design-driven innovation represents the pinnacle of many innovation endeavors.
The Apple Vision Pro exemplifies a product born from technological insight, and Apple has designed numerous successful products within this category. Renowned examples such as the iPhone 4 and the App Store are iconic technological insight-driven innovations.
There is a close relationship between the design-driven and technology-driven models. Only when technological breakthroughs are integrated with design-driven innovation can a product emerge with the ability to captivate and engage users.
Thus, design-driven innovation emphasizes constructing new concepts and visions while endowing products with fresh intrinsic meanings. It strives to achieve the ultimate goal of design: transforming the public and improving society.
Compared to previous design theories, the one of design-driven innovation suggests that technology is no longer the dominant element driving innovation. The dominance of technology and functionality in design, which prevailed since the industrial era, has been relegated to the background, giving way to the ideas and meanings embodied by products.
The fundamental reason for this shift lies in the advancement of the times. As society transitions from the industrial era to the information era, people's needs have evolved from basic necessities to higher-level demands and more immersive experiences. The rising standard of living among the general public also signifies that the foundational mindset in design must undergo iteration.
In the past, economic development was driven by market-oriented approaches. The rapid growth of internet and hardware technologies marked the technology-driven era. Now, design-driven has constructed a new paradigm of innovation suited to the current age. It not only adapts to the times but also leads to comprehensive industrial progress within this era.
5. The Relationship Between Design and Technology in the Development of the Times
In the 1970 definition of industrial design by the International Council of Societies of Industrial Design (ICSID), the focus was on economic efficiency driven by mass production, including aspects such as production line efficiency and market-driven industrial design.
In the 1980 definition by ICSID, the focus shifted to the inclusion of CMF and aesthetic design to attract consumer attention, marking a market differentiation-driven approach to industrial design aimed at increasing consumer demand.
The 2006 definition by ICSID expressed the shift to the information era, where technology had reached a global scale. In this context, technology-driven industrial design became the mediator between users and technology, playing an important role in providing experience design and development feedback for technology.
In 2015, the World Design Organization (WDO), which now maintains the current definition of industrial design, emphasized that design is driven by innovation (development goals). It introduced the concept of co-creation, which integrates interdisciplinary expertise, linking innovation, technology, business, research, and consumers in creative activities that guide development and offer strategic advantages.
Clearly, the evolution of the definition of industrial design reflects the changing times. As industries mature, the shift in thinking among pioneers and innovators in the context of the era represents the most advanced ideas of the time. In the future, the changing definition of design will continually present a challenge that we, designers, must face: we need to be at the forefront of exploration and creation to solve the problems our generation of designers will inevitably confront.
6. Conclusion
This paper, from the perspective of a designer, focusing on the transition from technology to design, analyzes the evolution of the innovation-driven model around the innovation of intrinsic product meanings. The aim is to explore a more standardized innovation paradigm within innovative design in the new era, offering potential suggestions for advancing industrial revolutions, economic transformation, and even social progress in the future.
Design-driven innovation will continue to evolve and iterate with the times. This study has theoretical limitations due to the lack of real data and research that respond to current societal conditions. My future research will aim to incorporate actual sample surveys to enhance the representativeness and reliability of the results.
It is not difficult to foresee that in the future, designers will collaborate across industries to build more mature innovation frameworks. This paper hopes to provide a more contemporary perspective on the emerging career paths of designers by analyzing modern design trends, offering a reference for the future development of innovation-driven design, and presenting a more relevant vision for growth and potential pathways.
References
[1]. VR Gyro. (2023, June 8). Technical analysis of Apple's MR device Vision Pro: A new era of spatial computing begins with extreme layering [EB/OL]. Retrieved from [VR Gyro website].
[2]. Zhixiangdongxi. (2023, June 7). Frame-by-frame analysis! How did Apple explain Vision Pro in 45 minutes? [N/OL]. Retrieved from [Zhixiangdongxi website].
[3]. Everyone is a Product Manager. (2022, July 27). Why do we say design can also drive innovation? [EB/OL]. Retrieved from [Everyone is a Product Manager website].
[4]. Tao, J. (2022). Review and evolution of design-driven innovation theory and trends: Based on the meaningful innovation framework. Science and Technology Management, 43(7), 50–62.
[5]. Hard Science and Technology Star Pro. (2022, August 9). The A-side and B-side of a Chinese startup: A low-profile "technical flow" core creates high brand premium [EB/OL]. Retrieved from [Hard Science and Technology Star Pro website].
[6]. Huang, L. (2023, May 10). The design history of Apple is the process of Jobs finding these three men [N/OL]. Qianyuan Kunhe Industry News. Retrieved from [Qianyuan Kunhe website].
[7]. Fang, E. (2022, September 26). Innovation cases: Apple's design thinking evangelism upgrades design-driven product innovation [N/OL]. Retrieved from [Fang Elysha website].
[8]. Zhang, J., Tan, R., Zhang, Z., Dai, J., & Yang, X. (2022). Integrated research on product concept design and detailed design driven by computer-aided innovation technology. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 52(5), 34–45.
[9]. Chen, Q., & Chen, G. (2022). A metamodel of the innovation driving force network driven by three dimensions: Theoretical integration of design-driven and technological innovation. Research in Dialectics of Nature, 28(5), 62–75.
[10]. Chen, C. (2022). User experience innovation research of design-driven brands: A case study of Starbucks. Design and Theory, 19(3), 80–88.
[11]. Design Rules. (2023, June 8). Introduction to Design: The definition of design [EB/OL]. Retrieved from [Design Rules website].
[12]. Gao, Z., Liu, G., & Dong, W. (2021). Design-driven enterprise digital collaboration innovation. Tsinghua Business Review, 9(3), 45–58.
Cite this article
Yao,J. (2025). Research on the Relationship Between Design and Technology in the Design-driven Innovation Model Based on the Case Analysis of Apple. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,166,21-26.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. VR Gyro. (2023, June 8). Technical analysis of Apple's MR device Vision Pro: A new era of spatial computing begins with extreme layering [EB/OL]. Retrieved from [VR Gyro website].
[2]. Zhixiangdongxi. (2023, June 7). Frame-by-frame analysis! How did Apple explain Vision Pro in 45 minutes? [N/OL]. Retrieved from [Zhixiangdongxi website].
[3]. Everyone is a Product Manager. (2022, July 27). Why do we say design can also drive innovation? [EB/OL]. Retrieved from [Everyone is a Product Manager website].
[4]. Tao, J. (2022). Review and evolution of design-driven innovation theory and trends: Based on the meaningful innovation framework. Science and Technology Management, 43(7), 50–62.
[5]. Hard Science and Technology Star Pro. (2022, August 9). The A-side and B-side of a Chinese startup: A low-profile "technical flow" core creates high brand premium [EB/OL]. Retrieved from [Hard Science and Technology Star Pro website].
[6]. Huang, L. (2023, May 10). The design history of Apple is the process of Jobs finding these three men [N/OL]. Qianyuan Kunhe Industry News. Retrieved from [Qianyuan Kunhe website].
[7]. Fang, E. (2022, September 26). Innovation cases: Apple's design thinking evangelism upgrades design-driven product innovation [N/OL]. Retrieved from [Fang Elysha website].
[8]. Zhang, J., Tan, R., Zhang, Z., Dai, J., & Yang, X. (2022). Integrated research on product concept design and detailed design driven by computer-aided innovation technology. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 52(5), 34–45.
[9]. Chen, Q., & Chen, G. (2022). A metamodel of the innovation driving force network driven by three dimensions: Theoretical integration of design-driven and technological innovation. Research in Dialectics of Nature, 28(5), 62–75.
[10]. Chen, C. (2022). User experience innovation research of design-driven brands: A case study of Starbucks. Design and Theory, 19(3), 80–88.
[11]. Design Rules. (2023, June 8). Introduction to Design: The definition of design [EB/OL]. Retrieved from [Design Rules website].
[12]. Gao, Z., Liu, G., & Dong, W. (2021). Design-driven enterprise digital collaboration innovation. Tsinghua Business Review, 9(3), 45–58.