
Gender Discrimination in the Workplace and Ways to Reduce Wage Gap
- 1 Shanghai American School Puxi, Jinfeng Rd., Shanghai, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Gender discrimination continues to persist in the workplace today, as evidenced by the 2021 median weekly earning of U.S. women amounting to 83.14% of men’s wages. This paper proposes and analyzes three strategies to address the gender bias and mitigate the wage gap in sexes: pay transparency, unconscious bias training, and fair salary determinants. Pay transparency can effectively highlight wage disparities and indirectly avoid wage gaps, but it does not directly offer a solution. Unconscious bias trainings are capable of raising awareness, though it may unintentionally reinforce certain stereotypes or provoke defensiveness. While pay transparency and unconscious bias trainings can establish short-term benefits, their limitations undermine their efficacy in the long term. Initializing fair salary determinants, the most sustainable solution, will be able to mitigate biases by evaluate employees based on objective criteria, including skill, effort, and responsibility, as suggested in the Equal Pay Act. By emphasizing the objectiveness in the workplace, impartial evaluations and transparent policies will form a fair work environment, especially for female workers to gain equal opportunities and fair compensation. Hence, this paper advocates for a most effective and plausible approach in establishing fair compensation and reduces workplace disparities.
Keywords
Gender Discrimination, Workplace Equity, Wage Gap, Employee Compensation
[1]. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Highlights of Women’s Earnings in 2020 : BLS Reports: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.” Www.bls.gov, Sept. 2021, www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-earnings/2020/home.htm.
[2]. Thomas, Ted, and Ira Chaleff. “Moral Courage and Intelligent Disobedience.” InterAgency Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, 2017, pp. 58–66, thesimonscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/IAJ-8-1-Winter2017-pg58-66.pdf.
[3]. Ely, R. J., et al. “Taking Gender into Account: Theory and Design for Women’s Leadership Development Programs.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 10, no. 3, 2011, pp. 474–493, flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/inseadwp2011/2011-69.pdf, https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0046.
[4]. Pew Research Center. “Women and Leadership.” Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project, 14 Jan. 2015, www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/01/14/women-and-leadership/.
[5]. Cullen, Zoë. “American Economic Association Is Pay Transparency Good?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 38, no. 1, 2024, pp. 153–180, www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27282178.pdf?refreqid=fastly-default%3A5e0db80d8febf3eb56bb47f1ffa51073&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_search_gsv2%2Fcontrol&origin=&initiator=&acceptTC=1.
[6]. Institute for Women's Policy Research. Private Sector Workers Lack Pay Transparency: Pay Secrecy May Reduce Women’s Bargaining Power and Contribute to Gender Wage Gap Figure 1. Pay Secrecy Policies by Type of Employer (All Workers). Dec. 2017.
[7]. Lam, Leon, et al. “Research: The Unintended Consequences of Pay Transparency.” Harvard Business Review, 12 Aug. 2022, hbr.org/2022/08/research-the-unintended-consequences-of-pay-transparency.
[8]. Mas, Alexandre. “Does Transparency Lead to Pay Compression?” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 125, no. 5, Oct. 2017, pp. 1683–1721, www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.1086/693137, https://doi.org/10.1086/693137.
[9]. Heilman, Madeline E., and Michelle C. Haynes. “No Credit Where Credit Is Due: Attributional Rationalization of Women’s Success in Male-Female Teams.” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 90, no. 5, 2005, pp. 905–916, www.csueastbay.edu/dsj/files/docs/academic-research-articles/dsjguide-journal-women-competency.pdf, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.905.
[10]. Girod, Sabine, et al. “Reducing Implicit Gender Leadership Bias in Academic Medicine with an Educational Intervention.” Academic Medicine, vol. 91, no. 8, Aug. 2016, pp. 1143–1150, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26826068/, https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001099.
[11]. Correll, Shelley J. “SWS 2016 Feminist Lecture: Reducing Gender Biases in Modern Workplaces: A Small Wins Approach to Organizational Change.” Gender & Society, vol. 31, no. 6, 9 Nov. 2017, pp. 725–750, womensfundmke.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/corell-2017-gender-and-org-change.pdf, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217738518.
[12]. United States Code. Title 29: LABOR. CHAPTER 8: FAIR LABOR STANDARDS. Edition 2022.
[13]. Burleson, Lena, et al. Pregnancy and Parental Status Discrimination: A Review of Career Impacts and Mitigation Strategies Response to DACOWITS RFI 16. Sept. 2022.
[14]. Halpert, Jane A., et al. “Pregnancy as a Source of Bias in Performance Appraisals.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 14, no. 7, 1993, pp. 649–663, www.jstor.org/stable/2488227?searchText=bias+on+pregnant+women&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dbias%2Bon%2Bpregnant%2Bwomen%26so%3Drel&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_search_gsv2%2Fcontrol&refreqid=fastly-default%3Af930215c0b8238e7397aa70cb0ca97a0&seq=2.
Cite this article
Dai,M.J. (2025). Gender Discrimination in the Workplace and Ways to Reduce Wage Gap. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,175,47-51.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).