
Financial Analysis and Investment Recommendations of Four Major Health Insurance Companies
- 1 Business School, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Under the background of intensifying competition in the health insurance industry, it is of great significance to analyze the financial status and development potential of enterprises for investors to make decisions. This paper takes the four major American Health insurance companies (UnitedHealth Group, Centene Corporation, Elevance Health Corporation and Cigna Group) as the research object. The purpose of financial index analysis (profitability, growth ability, valuation level) is to evaluate the competitive potential of enterprises and provide basis for investment decisions. CI achieves high growth through refined cost control and business expansion, while UNH is slowing down due to diminishing marginal effects of scale, and other companies (such as CNC) have potential investment opportunities due to low valuations. Investors should prioritize Cigna Group (CI) because of its high profitability, strong growth and low valuation with long-term return potential, while keeping an eye on industry policy changes and market volatility risks. There is still some room for improvement in this study, which needs to be improved gradually in the follow-up work.
Keywords
Health insurance, Financial analysis, profitability, growth capacity, investment recommendations
[1]. Swiss Re Institute. (2023). World insurance: The great inflation test (Sigma No.4/2023). Retrieved from https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/sigma
[2]. Deloitte. (2023).2024 Global Insurance Outlook: Navigating volatility through resilience. Retrieved from https:// www.2deloitte.com
[3]. Statista. (2023). Global health insurance market size by segment.Retrieved July 10, 2024, from https://www.statista.com
[4]. Grand View Research. (2023). Health insurance market size, share & trends analysis report,2023-2030(Report ID: GVR-4-68039-939-0).
[5]. Smith, A., & Johnson, R. L. (2021). Strategic portfolio optimization in managed care: Evidence from the U.S. health insurance industry. Health Affairs, 40(8), 1245-1252.
[6]. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox. *NBER Working Paper No. 24001.
[7]. Pisano, G. P. (2017). Toward a prescriptive theory of dynamic capabilities: Connecting strategic agility, scalability, and sustainability. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2233-2241.
[8]. Dranove, D., & Shanley, M. (2023). Mergers and productivity in the healthcare sector. Journal of Health Economics, 85, 102678.
[9]. Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2022). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339-376.
[10]. Ghemawat, P., & Altman, E. I. (2021). Globalization and business model innovation in healthcare. Strategic Management Journal, 42(5), 975-1001
[11]. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22.
[12]. Graham, J.R., & Harvey, C.R.(2001).The theory and practice of corporate finance:Evidence from the field.Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2-3),187-243.
[13]. Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L.(2018).Artificial intelligence and the 'good society': The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics,24(2),505-528.
Cite this article
Wu,M. (2025). Financial Analysis and Investment Recommendations of Four Major Health Insurance Companies. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,185,1-6.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of ICEMGD 2025 symposium: Innovating in Management and Economic Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).