1. Introduction
In 2023, the EV industry saw a 27% growth with $769.3 billion in revenue [1]. Tesla and BYD are representative companies with Tesla earning $78.509 billion and a 10.21% market share, and BYD earning $82.41 billion and a 10.97% market share [2, 3]. It is universally acknowledged that when researchers estimate a company's share price, investors are generally considered rational decision-makers. However, investors inevitably make several irrational choices, as they find it hard to be immune to the “herd effect” when big events happen in the market, especially in some emerging industries like the electric vehicle (EV) industry. This effect might change investors’ decisions and exert a profound but unknown influence on the stock prices of companies in such an industry. Despite this, limited research focuses on the impact of “herd behavior” on the stock prices of electric vehicle companies. In this case, this study aims to fill this gap by examining the effect of investor "herd behavior" on the stock prices of Tesla and BYD, two leading companies in the industry. The study hypothesizes that the “herd behavior” of investors leads to dramatic and irrational fluctuations of stock prices of companies in the electric vehicle industry.
2. Literature review
To understand the relationship between investor behavior and stock price volatility, it is important to clarify key concepts, particularly motivation and “herd behavior.” Motivation refers to what drives, or moves, an individual to take a certain action [4]. Different individuals can have different motivations for the same action, driven by differing goals and attitudes [5]. “Herd behavior,” on the other hand, describes a situation in which agents’ actions are motivated by not only their private information but also by the actions of others. Banerjee defines it as a phenomenon where “everyone is doing what everyone else is doing, even when their private information suggests doing something quite different” [6]. Bikhchandani et al. further elaborate that the “herd effect” occurs because individuals often encounter similar problems, similar knowledge, similar alternatives, and even similar payoffs, prompting them to follow others’ decisions [7].
With technological advancement creating more investment avenues, investor herding has become an influential factor in the stock market. Researchers have explored the existence of herding behavior and developed methods to measure this form of irrationality. Christie and Huang investigated herding during market stress using the Cross-Sectional Standard Deviation of Returns (CSSD), finding that low return dispersion between the stock and the market indicates investor “herd behavior” [8]. After that, a new measure of return dispersion called Cross-Sectional Absolute Deviation of Returns (CSAD) and a non-linear regression specification are proposed by Chang et al. to detect the “herd behavior” in the stock market, revealing that there is a partial presence of herding in Japan and a significant presence in emerging markets such as Korea and Taiwan, where investors pay more attention to macroeconomic information [9]. Further studies have expanded the scope to international markets. Evidence shows herding exists in advanced economies outside the U.S., and return dispersion in the U.S. can influence non-U.S. markets [10]. In Taiwan, both institutional and individual investors exhibit “herd behavior,” while in mainland China, Yao et al. Found significant herding in the B-share market, but not in the A-share market [11, 12]. Javaira and Hassanal mention that though the Pakistani stock market generally lacks herding, it emerges during crises due to information asymmetry and market uncertainty [13]. Although extensive research exists on herding in general equity markets, limited attention has been given to its effects on EV companies like Tesla and BYD. Studies have noted the divergence between Tesla’s stock price and its fundamentals [14]. And Yang observed that both Tesla and BYD experienced relatively stable stock performance until 2020, after which BYD showed more pronounced volatility and cyclical trends [15].
Given the limited focus on herding behavior in the EV industry, this study aims to explore the impact of investor herding on the stock prices of Tesla and BYD using systematic and comparative methods, thereby contributing new insights to behavioral finance research within sector-specific contexts.
3. Methodology
3.1. Research design
This study adopts a combination of qualitative research and quantitative research methods in the case study of Tesla and BYD. It begins with a literature review to identify gaps in existing studies, guiding the direction of the investigation. After that, using the CSAD model, this study sorts out two significant events of each company (e.g., the release of new products, the government intervention) that spark the “herd effect” by comparing the CSAD values ten workdays before and after these events. Calculating the variance and standard deviation of daily individual stock return rate, the study assesses changes in stock price volatility after these events. Ultimately, this research draws a conclusion on the effect of investor “herd behavior.”
3.2. Data source and analysis techniques
Significant events of each company are identified through global news and public articles. Historical stock price data and market return indexes are obtained from Yahoo Finance. This study collects stock prices ten workdays before and after each essential event to analyze potential investor “herd behavior.”
The daily individual return for each company is computed by the formula:
where
Similarly, the daily market rate of return is given by:
where
where
This research focuses on daily stock return data in the period of ten days before and after each significant event, so
where
Finally, descriptive analysis is used to analyze the trend of stock price volatility of two companies after big events that trigger investor “herd behavior.”
4. Empirical analysis
4.1. Essential events that trigger investor “herd behavior”
Event 1: The Tesla Model Y, a mid-sized SUV electric vehicle developed by Tesla, was released in Los Angeles on March 15, 2019. By collecting daily stock prices of Tesla and the daily value of the S&P 500 Index in the ten-day period before this release and comparing the stock return and the market return rate (Table 1) in the same selected period, the study figures out that the CSAD value before the release of Model Y is 2.42%.
Date |
2.28 |
3.1 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
3.11 |
3.12 |
3.13 |
3.14 |
SP |
21.33 |
19.65 |
19.02 |
18.44 |
18.42 |
18.44 |
18.94 |
19.39 |
18.89 |
19.26 |
19.33 |
SR (%) |
/ |
-7.88 |
-3.21 |
-3.05 |
-0.11 |
0.11 |
2.71 |
2.38 |
-2.58 |
1.96 |
0.36 |
S & P |
2784.49 |
2803.69 |
2792.81 |
2789.65 |
2771.45 |
2748.93 |
2743.07 |
2783.30 |
2791.52 |
2810.92 |
2808.48 |
MR (%) |
/ |
0.69 |
-0.39 |
-0.11 |
-0.65 |
-0.81 |
-0.21 |
1.47 |
0.30 |
0.70 |
-0.09 |
Note: SP (Stock Price); (SR) Stock Return; S&P (S&P 500 Index); MR (Market Return)
Based on data in Table 2, the absolute deviation (CSAD value) after the launch of Model Y is 2.16%, which is lower than the value (2.42%) before the event. Thus, it is evident that investor “herd behavior” is present after the release of Model Y.
Date |
3.15 |
3.18 |
3.19 |
3.20 |
3.21 |
3.22 |
3.25 |
3.26 |
3.27 |
3.28 |
SP |
18.36 |
17.97 |
17.83 |
18.24 |
18.27 |
17.64 |
17.36 |
17.85 |
18.32 |
18.57 |
SR (%) |
-5.02 |
-2.12 |
-0.78 |
2.30 |
0.16 |
-3.45 |
-1.59 |
2.82 |
2.63 |
1.37 |
S & P |
2822.48 |
2832.94 |
2832.57 |
2824.23 |
2854.88 |
2800.71 |
2798.36 |
2818.46 |
2805.37 |
2815.44 |
MR (%) |
0.50 |
0.37 |
-0.01 |
-0.29 |
1.09 |
-1.90 |
-0.08 |
0.72 |
-0.46 |
0.36 |
Date |
9.25 |
9.26 |
9.27 |
9.30 |
10.1 |
10.2 |
10.3 |
10.4 |
10.7 |
10.8 |
10.9 |
SP |
257.02 |
254.22 |
260.46 |
261.63 |
258.02 |
249.02 |
240.66 |
250.08 |
240.83 |
244.50 |
241.05 |
SR (%) |
/ |
-1.09 |
2.46 |
0.45 |
-1.38 |
-3.49 |
-3.36 |
3.91 |
-3.70 |
1.52 |
-1.41 |
S & P |
5722.26 |
5745.37 |
5738.17 |
5762.48 |
5708.75 |
5709.54 |
5699.94 |
5751.07 |
5695.94 |
5751.13 |
5792.04 |
MR (%) |
/ |
0.40 |
-0.13 |
0.42 |
-0.93 |
0.01 |
-0.17 |
0.90 |
-0.96 |
0.97 |
0.71 |
Event 2: On October 10, 2024, in the Hollywood studio of Warner Bros., Tesla held the "We, Robot" press conference. By finding the daily stock prices of Tesla and the S&P 500 Index in the ten-day period before this press conference and comparing the stock return and the market return (Table 3), the study figures out that the CSAD value before the press conference is 1.97%.
According to Table 4, the absolute deviation (CSAD value) of the stock return rate and the market return rate in the ten-day period after the “We, Robot” press conference is 1.43%, which is lower than the value before the event (1.97%). Therefore, this press conference indeed triggers investor “herd effect” among investors.
Date |
10.10 |
10.11 |
10.14 |
10.15 |
10.16 |
10.17 |
10.18 |
10.21 |
10.22 |
10.23 |
SP |
238.77 |
217.8 |
219.16 |
219.57 |
221.33 |
220.89 |
220.7 |
218.85 |
217.97 |
213.65 |
SR (%) |
-0.946 |
-8.783 |
0.624 |
0.187 |
0.802 |
-0.199 |
-0.086 |
-0.838 |
-0.402 |
-1.982 |
S & P |
5780.05 |
5815.26 |
5859.85 |
5815.26 |
5842.27 |
5841.47 |
5864.67 |
5853.98 |
5851.2 |
5797.42 |
MR(%) |
-0.207 |
0.609 |
0.767 |
-0.761 |
0.464 |
-0.014 |
0.397 |
-0.182 |
-0.047 |
-0.919 |
Event 3: BYD Song Pro was officially launched on July 11, 2019, and won the Best New Car Award at the 2019 Shanghai Auto Show Organizing Committee. Using the CSAD model to figure out the absolute deviation of the daily stock return rate of BYD and the market return rate ten days before this release, this study finds that the CSAD value before this event is 1.37%. All the data involved in the calculation is shown in Table 5.
Date |
6.25 |
6.26 |
6.27 |
6.28 |
7.1 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
7.5 |
7.8 |
7.9 |
7.10 |
SR |
11.89 |
11.84 |
11.87 |
12.05 |
12.18 |
12.44 |
12.51 |
12.18 |
11.91 |
12.12 |
12.22 |
SR (%) |
/ |
-0.42 |
0.25 |
1.52 |
1.08 |
2.14 |
0.56 |
-2.64 |
-2.22 |
1.76 |
0.83 |
SSE CI |
2982.07 |
2976.28 |
2996.79 |
2978.88 |
3044.9 |
3043.94 |
3015.26 |
3011.06 |
2933.36 |
2928.23 |
2915.3 |
MR (%) |
/ |
-0.19 |
0.69 |
-0.60 |
2.22 |
-0.03 |
-0.94 |
-0.14 |
-2.58 |
-0.18 |
-0.44 |
Note: CI means Composite Index. Based on the data listed in the following tables, the new CSAD value after the launch of the BYD Song Pro is 1.03%. Since the value becomes lower after the release, investor “herd behavior” does appear after this event of BYD.
Date |
7.11 |
7.12 |
7.15 |
7.16 |
7.17 |
7.18 |
7.19 |
7.22 |
7.23 |
7.24 |
7.25 |
SP |
12.09 |
12.1 |
12.24 |
12.18 |
12.37 |
12.19 |
12.22 |
12.3 |
12.61 |
12.7 |
12.52 |
SR (%) |
-1.064 |
0.083 |
1.157 |
-0.490 |
1.560 |
-1.455 |
0.246 |
0.655 |
2.520 |
0.714 |
-1.417 |
SSE CI |
2917.76 |
2930.55 |
2942.19 |
2937.62 |
2931.69 |
2901.18 |
2924.2 |
2886.97 |
2899.94 |
2923.28 |
2937.36 |
MR (%) |
0.084 |
0.438 |
0.397 |
-0.155 |
-0.202 |
-1.041 |
0.793 |
-1.273 |
0.449 |
0.805 |
0.482 |
Event 4: On the evening of February 10th, 2025, BYD held an intelligent strategy press conference at its headquarters in Shenzhen and unveiled the "Heavenly Eye" high-level intelligent driving system. Using data in Table 7, the CSAD value before BYD’s press conference is 3.61%.
Date |
1.24 |
1.27 |
1.28 |
1.29 |
1.3 |
1.31 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
SP |
70.52 |
70.3 |
70.35 |
70.35 |
71.6 |
70.08 |
70.92 |
73.31 |
72.76 |
79.55 |
84.53 |
SR (%) |
/ |
-0.31 |
0.071 |
0.00 |
1.78 |
-2.12 |
1.199 |
3.37 |
-0.75 |
9.332 |
6.26 |
SSE CI |
3230.16 |
3252.63 |
3250.6 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
3229.49 |
3270.66 |
3303.67 |
MR(%) |
/ |
0.696 |
-0.06 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
1.275 |
1.009 |
*Some data is not available due to the Chinese Spring Festival.
In the ten-day period after BYD’s press conference (Table 8), the CSAD value falls to 2.84%, which suggests that there is investor “herd behavior” after this event.
Date |
2.10 |
2.11 |
2.12 |
2.13 |
2.14 |
2.18 |
2.19 |
2.20 |
2.21 |
2.24 |
2.25 |
SP |
86.62 |
84.87 |
91.57 |
88.35 |
93.38 |
93.20 |
93.88 |
98.63 |
100.9 |
98.37 |
100.2 |
SR |
2.47 |
-2.02 |
7.89 |
-3.52 |
5.69 |
-0.19 |
0.73 |
5.06 |
2.30 |
-2.51 |
1.83 |
SSE CI |
3322.17 |
3318.06 |
3346.39 |
3332.48 |
3346.72 |
3324.49 |
3351.54 |
3350.78 |
3379.11 |
3373.03 |
3346.04 |
MR |
0.56 |
-0.12 |
0.85 |
-0.42 |
0.43 |
-0.66 |
0.81 |
-0.02 |
0.85 |
-0.18 |
-0.8 |
4.2. Volatility of company stock prices before and after the presence of investor “herd behavior”
Applying the formulas of variance and standard deviation (volatility) mentioned before, the research determines changes in stock price volatility after each crucial event that leads to investor “herd behavior.” The results are listed in Table 9.
Event |
Pre-Variance |
Post-Variance |
Pre-Volatility |
Post-Volatility |
1 |
0.11% |
0.08% |
3.28% |
2.70% |
2 |
0.07% |
0.08% |
2.63% |
2.80% |
3 |
0.03% |
0.02% |
1.61% |
1.34% |
4 |
0.12% |
0.14% |
3.53% |
3.80% |
For Tesla, although the “herding effect” does not directly increase its stock price volatility, it does bring about a dramatic fluctuation in stock prices on the day on which the significant event happens or the day immediately after the event. For instance, the difference between the average stock return rate of Tesla and its return rate on March 15th, 2019, rises to 4.65%, and the difference on October 11th, 2024, which is the day after Tesla’s “We, Robot” press conference, increases to 7.62%. Similarly, in terms of BYD’s stock price volatility after each event, it does not increase dramatically in every ten-day period after these events. However, investor “herd behavior” truly causes a remarkable and irrational fluctuation in stock prices in the two days following the release of Song Pro and the press conference in Shenzhen.
5. Conclusion
While the results reveal that the volatility of stock prices of two EV companies does not increase significantly after the “herding effect” among investors occurred, the findings from this research confirm that investors’ “herd behavior” increases stock price volatility in the two days following the occurrence of such major events that trigger this kind of behavior, corresponding to the hypothesis.
However, the study does have certain limitations. Firstly, it is sometimes confronted with difficulties in gaining access to accurate data of stock prices from reliable sources. Furthermore, the CSAD model is a measure used in financial research to assess the dispersion of individual stock returns relative to the market return. This measure helps identify the “herd behavior” among investors, where investors tend to follow the market trend rather than making independent decisions. However, if there is both investor “herd behavior” and local divergence in the market, the CSAD value may also rise. Future research still needs to consider the overall market conditions during the period to determine whether the event actually triggers the “herd behavior” of investors, as broader market trends can also influence “herd behavior.”
In conclusion, the study supports the hypothesis that the “herd behavior” of investors leads to dramatic and irrational fluctuations of stock prices of companies in the electric vehicle industry, especially in the two days immediately after these events. Future research may expand on this study by incorporating more events that lead to the “herd effect” among investors, conducting research on other EV companies’ cases, and tracking the long-term effects of the “herd behavior” as the market grows.
References
[1]. Statista. (2024) “Electric Vehicles: Market Data Analysis & Forecast”. Statista. Retrieved form https://www. statista. com/study/103895/electric-vehicles-report/
[2]. U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2024). Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item405]. Retrieved from https://www. sec. gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001318605/000162828024002390/tsla-20231231. htm
[3]. BYD Co. , LTD. (March, 2024). Annual Report 2023. Eastern Wealth Network. https://pdf. dfcfw. com/pdf/H2_AN202403261628203493_1. pdf
[4]. Beck, R. C. 2000. Motivation: Theories and Principles. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[5]. Ryan, R. M. , & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
[6]. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The quarterly journal of economics, 107(3), 797-817.
[7]. Bikhchandani, S. , Hirshleifer, D. , & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of economic perspectives, 12(3), 151-170.
[8]. Christie, W. G. , & Huang, R. D. (1995). Following the pied piper: do individual returns herd around the market?. Financial Analysts Journal, 51(4), 31-37.
[9]. Chang, E. C. , Cheng, J. W. , & Khorana, A. (2000). An examination of herd behavior in equity markets: An international perspective. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(10), 1651-1679.
[10]. Chiang, T. C. , & Zheng, D. (2010). An empirical analysis of herd behavior in global stock markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(8), 1911-1921.
[11]. Hsieh, S. F. (2013). Individual and institutional herding and the impact on stock returns: Evidence from Taiwan stock market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 29, 175-188.
[12]. Yao, J. , Ma, C. , & He, W. P. (2014). Investor herding behaviour of Chinese stock market. International Review of Economics & Finance, 29, 12-29.
[13]. Javaira, Z. , & Hassan, A. (2015). An examination of herding behavior in Pakistani stock market. International journal of emerging markets, 10(3), 474-490.
[14]. Cheng, Y. , & Griffin, C. (2022). Tesla vs. its Stock Price:“Herd Theory” at work?. Southern University College of Business E-Journal, 16(1), 4.
[15]. Yang, K. (2024). Forecasting EV Stock Trends Based on ARIMA Model Represented by Tesla and BYD. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 30, 135-141.
Cite this article
Gao,A. (2025). Investor Herding and Stock Price Volatility in the Electric Vehicle Industry: An Empirical Study on Tesla and BYD. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,196,39-45.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of ICEMGD 2025 Symposium: The 4th International Conference on Applied Economics and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Statista. (2024) “Electric Vehicles: Market Data Analysis & Forecast”. Statista. Retrieved form https://www. statista. com/study/103895/electric-vehicles-report/
[2]. U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2024). Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item405]. Retrieved from https://www. sec. gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001318605/000162828024002390/tsla-20231231. htm
[3]. BYD Co. , LTD. (March, 2024). Annual Report 2023. Eastern Wealth Network. https://pdf. dfcfw. com/pdf/H2_AN202403261628203493_1. pdf
[4]. Beck, R. C. 2000. Motivation: Theories and Principles. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[5]. Ryan, R. M. , & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
[6]. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The quarterly journal of economics, 107(3), 797-817.
[7]. Bikhchandani, S. , Hirshleifer, D. , & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of economic perspectives, 12(3), 151-170.
[8]. Christie, W. G. , & Huang, R. D. (1995). Following the pied piper: do individual returns herd around the market?. Financial Analysts Journal, 51(4), 31-37.
[9]. Chang, E. C. , Cheng, J. W. , & Khorana, A. (2000). An examination of herd behavior in equity markets: An international perspective. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(10), 1651-1679.
[10]. Chiang, T. C. , & Zheng, D. (2010). An empirical analysis of herd behavior in global stock markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(8), 1911-1921.
[11]. Hsieh, S. F. (2013). Individual and institutional herding and the impact on stock returns: Evidence from Taiwan stock market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 29, 175-188.
[12]. Yao, J. , Ma, C. , & He, W. P. (2014). Investor herding behaviour of Chinese stock market. International Review of Economics & Finance, 29, 12-29.
[13]. Javaira, Z. , & Hassan, A. (2015). An examination of herding behavior in Pakistani stock market. International journal of emerging markets, 10(3), 474-490.
[14]. Cheng, Y. , & Griffin, C. (2022). Tesla vs. its Stock Price:“Herd Theory” at work?. Southern University College of Business E-Journal, 16(1), 4.
[15]. Yang, K. (2024). Forecasting EV Stock Trends Based on ARIMA Model Represented by Tesla and BYD. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 30, 135-141.