Research Article
Open access
Published on 13 September 2023
Download pdf
Wang,Y. (2023). Family Fertility Cost Estimation Based on CFPS Data. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,8,30-36.
Export citation

Family Fertility Cost Estimation Based on CFPS Data

Yilin Wang *,1,
  • 1 Huazhong Agricultural University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/8/20230273

Abstract

The "demographic dividend" has brought abundant labor resources and low labor costs to our country. However, the official data released by the National Bureau of Statistics in 2021 shows that China's total fertility rate is 1.3. With the obvious trend, this endowment advantage will no longer exist. It is of great significance in contemporary China to calculate the cost of family fertility that leads to low fertility willingness, and to formulate policies to increase the fertility rate. Therefore, the paper builds a model to calculate the cost of family fertility in China through the equivalence scale theory, and calculates that the equivalence scale level of the family fertility cost in China is 1.41, which is a relatively high level in the world. On this basis, the paper analyzes the reasons for the high cost of fertility, and summarizes the shortcomings of the paper's research, therefore putting forward suggestions for future research.

Keywords

family fertility cost, equivalence scale theory, fertility rate

[1]. Apps P, Rees R.: Household Production, Full Consumption and the Costs of Children. Labour Economics (6), 621-648 (2002).

[2]. Bradbury B.: The Price, Cost, Consumption and Value of Children. Labor and Demography (11), 1-27 (2004).

[3]. Diprete T A, Morgan S P, Engelhardt H, Pacalova H.: Do Cross-National Differences in the Costs of Children Generate Cross-National Differences in Fertility Rates?. Population Research and Policy Review (22), 439-477 (2003).

[4]. Scheiwe K.: Caring and Paying for Children and Gender Inequalities: Institutional Configurations in Comparative Per-spective. Journal of Family History (1), 182-198 (2003).

[5]. [Glauber R.: Trends in the Motherhood Wage Penalty and Fatherhood Wage Premium for Low, Middle, and High Earners. Demography (5), 1663-1680 (2018).

[6]. Yang H, Hu H, Zhang W.: The Influence of the Scale and Mode of Education Expenditure on the Fertility Level. Population and Development (2), 2-10 (2020).

[7]. Liao J, Zhou T.: Fertility Punishment in Women's Career Development. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (1), 139-154 (2020).

[8]. Ma C.: The Cost of Child Rearing in Chinese Families and its Policy Implications. Journal of Women's Studies (5), 70-84 (2018).

[9]. Zhu L.: Fertility Policy, Opportunity Cost and Fertility Demand: Micro-evidence from China's Comprehensive Social Survey. Northwest Population (2), 90-101 (2020).

[10]. Liang H, Zhang H.: The Cost of Declining Fertility. China Finance (7), 104 (2020).

[11]. Pollak R A, Wales T J.: Welfare Comparisons and Equivalence Scales. USA Economic Review 69(2), 216-221 (1979).

[12]. BMS Van Praag.: Individual Welfare Functions and Consumer Behavior: A Theory of Rational Irrationality. North-Holland Publishing Company, North-Holland (1968).

[13]. Schwarze J.: Using Panel Data on Income Satisfaction to Estimate Equivalence Scale Elasticity. Review of Income and Wealth 49(3), 359-372 (2003).

[14]. Oyama M.: Measuring Cost of Children Using Equivalence Scale on Japanese Panel Data. Applied Economics Letters 13(7), 409-415 (2006).

[15]. Selim R, Kaya G.: The Changes of Cost of Children for Turkey by Using Income-Dependent Equivalence Scales. Social Indicators Research 139(2), 803-824 (2018).

Cite this article

Wang,Y. (2023). Family Fertility Cost Estimation Based on CFPS Data. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,8,30-36.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies

Conference website: https://2023.confbps.org/
ISBN:978-1-915371-43-0(Print) / 978-1-915371-44-7(Online)
Conference date: 26 February 2023
Editor:Javier Cifuentes-Faura, Canh Thien Dang
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.8
ISSN:2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).