
The Impact of Government Policies on Natural Monopoly Markets based on Evolutionary Games
- 1 Macau University of Science and Technology
- 2 Macau University of Science and Technology
- 3 Shanghai Institute of Technology
- 4 WLSA Shanghai Academy
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Financing is difficult during the post-epidemic era. A lot of industries occupied by monopolies are so large that the goods they produce are often "over-priced" and this will have a number of adverse effects on market equilibrium. This paper constructs a game model in which the government, the monopolies and the SMEs wishing to enter the monopoly market are the main actors, and this article analyzes the impact of the government's actions on the monopoly market and make conclusive recommendations. The final choice of three sides of the game can be obtained by discussing whether the government chooses to regulate the monopoly market with subsidies and taxes, whether the monopolies set high or low prices and whether the Small and medium-sized enterprises are willing to enter the monopoly market. The final analysis of the evolutionary game model concludes that: the strength of government regulation is the decisive factor in the final Nash equilibrium point of the game.
Keywords
post-epidemic era, monopoly, regulation, evolutionary game
[1]. Hu, A. G., Guo, Y.: Comprehensive Strategy and System Design for Preventing Corruption in the Transition Period. Managing the world (6), 12 (2001).
[2]. Clements, B. J., Hugounen, R., Schwartz, G.: Government Subsidies Concepts, International Trends, and Reform Options. IMF Working Papers 95, 91 (1995).
[3]. Zhu, J. S., Zhu, H.: Can government subsidies stimulate enterprise innovation-Analysis of Innovation Behavior of New and Incumbent Enterprises Based on Evolutionary Game. China Management Science 29(12), 15 (2021).
[4]. Cao, L. Y.: Exploring the Optimization of Government Subsidies to Enterprises for Pollution Control Based on Game Model. Humanities magazine (6), 8 (2017).
[5]. Shapiro, C.: The theory of business strategy. The Rand journal of economics 20, 1 (1989).
[6]. Parente, S. L., Prescott, E. C.: Barriers to riches. The MIT Press, (2000).
[7]. Yao, P.Y.: Research on the impact path of government subsidies on SMEs' innovation. Technical economy 41(2), 12 (2022).
[8]. Wu, Q. J., Chen, Z. G., Qiao, W. Q.: Understanding and Regulation Choice of "Predatory Pricing". Reality, (2006).
[9]. Cao, W. Y., Qing, C. Y.: The Feasibility of Introducing Government Subsidies into the Credit Guarantee of Small and Medium sized Enterprises in China: From the perspective of game theory. Shanghai Finance 12, 4 (2009).
[10]. He, R.: Research on the Problem of "Green Drifting" of Enterprises Based on Tripartite Evolutionary Game. Shanghai Business 6, 4 (2020).
Cite this article
Chen,Z.;Fu,M.;Fu,Z.;Zhang,S. (2023). The Impact of Government Policies on Natural Monopoly Markets based on Evolutionary Games. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,11,208-216.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).