Research of Customer Satisfaction in Aviation

Research Article
Open access

Research of Customer Satisfaction in Aviation

Tong Wu 1*
  • 1 Banking and Finance, Caulfield, Monash University, Melbourne, 3145, Australia    
  • *corresponding author twuu0037@student.monash.edu
Published on 21 March 2023 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/4/20221011
AEMPS Vol.4
ISSN (Print): 2754-1169
ISSN (Online): 2754-1177
ISBN (Print): 978-1-915371-17-1
ISBN (Online): 978-1-915371-18-8

Abstract

There has been a drastic increase in the number of people using air as a transport model across the world. Globalization has triggered rapid increase in the international travel which is offered by various airlines which has resulted to competition. This implies that customer satisfaction is key. The research aimed at establishing customer satisfaction in the aviation industry. Data from cross-sectional data from different airlines. The data is obtained from a Brazilian public dataset. The data has been analyzed using SPSS Software regression analysis, descriptive analysis, extraction method, and using ANOVA. According to the analysis, Age, departure delay, departure and arrival time convenience, ease of online booking, check-in service, online boarding, seat comfort, cleanliness, food and drinks, Inflight WIFI Service, Inflight entertainment, and baggage handling have a positive R which is an indication that they have a positive relationship with the rating.

Keywords:

Regression, Airline, Anova., Flight, Satisfaction

Wu,T. (2023). Research of Customer Satisfaction in Aviation. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,4,24-31.
Export citation

1. Introduction

The number of people using air transport as the mode of transport has increased significantly over the years. Initially, air transport was used for international travel, however, the aviation industry has evolved and there has been an increase in the number of flights domestically and internationally for pleasure and business. The rapid growth of the aviation industry is majorly attributed to economic globalization which opened borders and openness. Globalization led to the expansion of economic, educational, and tourism activities across the world.

There are numerous airlines offering air transport services. However, some airlines are preferred compared to others based on customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction is based on getting 'value for your money. Travelers will always choose airlines that offer quality services based on what they want. There are numerous factors that people consider when selecting the plane that they want to board. Therefore, airlines need to understand the factors that are considered by travelers when choosing airlines. This helps them to tailor their services based on the requirement of the travelers and enable them to understand the market. According to Park et al., the decision of passengers on the choice of airline to use is based on service value (price), service perception, service expectation, the reputation of the airline, and passenger satisfaction [1]. Park et al. stated that customer satisfaction determines whether the customer will use the plane again or not [1].

The airline industry has become competitive due to the presence of numerous airlines. The main points of competition are the prices and services offered. Airlines constantly upgrade the services that they offer to increase customer satisfaction. In a report by Stern [2], the major determinants of the market base of an airline are the prices and services offered. Many people prefer to board airlines with lower prices and at the same time, all the people prefer to board planes that offer quality services that make them satisfied. Therefore, this study aims to determine the factors that determine the quality of services and satisfaction of passengers using air transport since if an airline provides quality services it remains uncompetitive, unlike the airlines that provide satisfactory quality services.

2. Literature Review

The airline industry is highly competitive hence it has attracted numerous studies in the past which focused on the competition determinants and quality of services. Ina research titled 'Key drivers of airline loyalty", Sarah et al. [3] established that passengers usually establish personal attraction to airlines if the quality of services offered to them is great and satisfactory. Personal attraction results in airline loyalty making them prefer using a particular airline irrespective of the underlying circumstances like prices. Sarah et al. [3] stated that customer loyalty is built based on factors such as trust, satisfaction, service recovery, price, and how workers operate. The research also indicated that the growth of a company is based on retained/ loyal customers. An airline that has a high number of passengers loyal to it will grow fast as compared to an airline with low customer loyalty [4]. This is because customer loyalty comes as a result of quality services that are satisfactory to the customers and therefore the customers will not just use the airline again but will also recommend their friends and relatives to use the airline.

The center of competition in the airline industry is the provision of services. According to Pellman and Xu [5], if the prices of different airlines are the same for a particular route, the customers will prefer the airline with high-quality services [6]. Pellman and Xu also state that the first consideration for customers will always be the price since many people will choose airlines with lower prices as compared to airlines with higher prices [7]. Chang and Hong however argued that the quality of services and customer satisfaction supersedes the prices of air tickets. They state that quality services come with prices and therefore airlines with high-quality services tend to have high prices while those with low prices have low-quality services. However, Akamavi et al. stated that sometimes price does not matter and that customers will go for high-quality services irrespective of price [8].

According to Sarah et al. [3], airline customers can be separated into the rich and the middle class. In their research, they stated that rich customers will always go quality instead of price while the middle class who are mostly board economy class tend to consider ticket price before quality. The research by Sarah et al. [3] provided insight into the behavior and financial spending of rich and middle-income earners when choosing airlines and their level of expectation of the quality of services.

Fourrie and Lubbe [9] conducted a study to determine the factors that contribute to the satisfaction of customers before and after boarding a plane for South African Airlines. The research was aimed at understanding the factors that Business travelers in South Africa consider before they book a flight ticket. In their research, they surveyed using a questionnaire at the Johannesburg International airport in 2016 and used the data to make conclusions [10]. The structured questionnaires were issued to passengers who had arrived at the airport from other airports and the travelers who were waiting to board their planes. Their research separated local travelers and international travelers on one side and the type of airlines that they were using which were low-cost or full-service. The goal of their research was to determine the factors that make air transport satisfactory for a different group of travelers. The results of the study identified the factors that contribute to quality services and satisfaction to travelers including; Flight delay, departure delay, departure and arrival time convenience, ease of online booking, check-in service, online boarding, gate location, seat comfort, cleanliness, food and drinks, leg-room service, in-flight WIFI, and in-flight entertainment [11]. The results of the study were similar to the study conducted in Brazil by Evangelho et al. [12,13] and the one conducted at Heathrow Airport, the UK by Mason [14].

2.1. Determination Of Airlines Customer Satisfaction

This research uses the evidence obtained from the research by Fourrie and Lubbe [9] in the determination of satisfaction ratings by customers. The satisfaction rating parameters include; Flight distance, departure delay, departure and arrival time convenience, ease of online booking, check-in service, online boarding, gate location, seat comfort, cleanliness, food and drinks, leg-room service, in-flight WI-FI, and in-flight entertainment. There is no other study that uses this parameter apart from Fourrie and Lubbe [9]. However, the research by Fourrie and Lubbe focuses on the South African market only [9]. It is acknowledgeable that other research focused on customer satisfaction and quality of services in the aviation industry. The previous researches are mentioned in this research since they are used in formulating the research objectives and the variables to be used in this research.

2.2. Research objectives

Determination of factors that influence customer satisfaction in flight

Determination of how factor analysis can be used to reduce the dimension of variables

Determination of the predicted performance and how factor analysis can be used

Determining the level of dissatisfaction of travelers in the airlines.

2.3. Research questions

What factors can significantly influence customer satisfaction on a flight?

How to use factor analysis to reduce dimensions for variables?

What is the predicted performance, and how to use factors after dimension reduction to predict by logistic regression?

What is the level of dissatisfaction of travelers with the airlines?

3. Research Methodology

3.1. Type and source of data

The research uses cross-sectional data from different airlines. The data is obtained from a Brazilian public dataset [15]. The dataset includes information from different airports in Brazil ranging from low-cost carriers and full-service carriers. The data is based on raw information collected from travelers and through published reviews. The idea behind the data is that passengers like to give reviews based on the quality of services offered by an airline and their satisfaction. Therefore the Brazilian public dataset provides all the information based on the review of the travelers.

The ratings are based on different services such as flight delay, departure delay, departure and arrival time convenience, ease of online booking, check-in service, online boarding, gate location, seat comfort, cleanliness, food and drinks, leg-room service, in-flight WIFI, and in-flight entertainment. The rating is based on individual factors. The rating ranges from 1 to 5 where 1 is the lowest rate while 5 is the highest rate.

The data is also based on the gender and age of travelers since traveling is not preserved only for a particular age group. The data contains a review of 2999 travelers who provided a review of airlines based on the set factors. The aim of this research is therefore to analyze the data and obtain a conclusion based on customer satisfaction. As noted before, this research uses cross-sectional data.

3.2. Variable Description

Satisfaction is the dependent variable in this research since it is the one that is affected by the quality of services. The ratings of variables ranging from 0 to 5 where 0 is low quality while 5 is the highest quality. The rating of an airline helps travelers choose the airline with better quality than the rest. The data also shows the level at which the travelers are dissatisfied with the services of a particular airline. The information is important since it enables the airlines to understand the areas that they need to improve in the services that they provide Akamavi et al. [8]. The variables include; Flight distance, departure delay, departure and arrival time convenience, ease of online booking, check-in service, online boarding, gate location, seat comfort, cleanliness, food and drinks, leg-room service, in-flight WI-FI, and in-flight entertainment.

3.3. Figures and Tables

Statistical Description

The following is the statistical description of the variables analyzed;

Table 1. Statistical Description

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Rating

4.2583

1.44809

2999

Age

41.15

.85172

2999

Flight distance

1103.15

.79005

2999

Departure delay

3.1179

.75045

2999

Arrival delay

3.7292

.78154

2999

Departure and Arrival Time Convenience

3.5311

.72857

2999

Ease of online booking

3.6252

.71572

2999

Check-in service

3.5217

.69327

2999

Online boarding

3.4194

.62651

2999

Gate location

3.3151

.65741

2999

On board service

3.3279

.59341

2999

Seat comfort

3.1573

.53715

2999

Leg-room service

3.5236

.64291

2999

Cleanliness

2.9712

.75342

2999

Food and drinks

2.5337

.54851

2999

In-flight WIFI services

3.2174

.71834

2999

In-flight entertainment

3.1826

.61739

2999

Baggage handling

3.0423

.61739

2999

Table 1 presents the descriptive statistic of the data. The total number of travelers who gave a review of airlines is 2999. It can be seen that the mean age of the participants is 41.15years. This is an indication that the majority of the people who travel using airlines are middle-aged people. Based on the ratings, it can be seen that 0.6 of the total population showed that they are satisfied while 0.4% were neutral or dissatisfied. The difference in satisfaction and dissatisfaction of travelers can be caused by boarding different airlines.

3.4. Regression Result

SPSS was used in regression analysis

Table 2. Model Summary

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

Change Statistics

R Square Change

F Change

df1

1

.414a

.171

.102

.42460

.171

2.478

3

The regression analysis indicates the relationship between the satisfaction variables and the rating. The value of R is .414 which is an indication that all the variables in the model have a significant relationship with the rating.

Table 3. Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized

Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

(Rating)

2.699

.586

4.608

.000

Age

.291

.207

.292

1.404

.169

Flight distance

-.017

.155

-.021

-.109

.014

Departure delay

.251

.159

.161

1.215

.005

Departure and arrival time convenience

.231

.128

.138

0.954

.001

Ease of online booking

.192

.165

.176

1.339

.006

Check in service

.091

.195

.192

.852

.016

Online boarding

.271

.129

.136

1.528

.012

Gate location

-.052

.182

-.042

-.042

.162

On-board service

-.129

.217

-.122

1.278

.051

Seat comfort

.351

.254

.347

.853

.002

Leg-room service

-.028

.274

-.026

.975

.173

Cleanliness

.196

.159

.162

.921

.005

Food and drinks

.275

.276

.283

.127

.001

Inflight WIFI Service

.192

.153

.163

.953

.045

In-flight entertainment

.219

.162

.179

.901

.152

Baggage handling

.139

.150

.181

.925

.361

The coefficients of this model present the relationship between the satisfaction variables and the rating. Based on the output, it can be seen that Age, departure delay, departure and arrival time convenience, ease of online booking, check-in service, online boarding, seat comfort, cleanliness, food and drinks, Inflight WIFI Service, Inflight entertainment, and baggage handling have a positive R which is an indication that they have a positive relationship with the rating. This also means that any increase in the quality of the variables increases the satisfaction of travelers while their decrease decreases the satisfaction of travelers. However, Flight distance, leg-room service, gate location, and onboard service do not affect rating highly since they have a negative value.

Table 4. Extraction Method

Model

Communalities

Initial

Extraction

Age

1.00

.421

Flight distance

1.00

.682

Departure delay

1.00

.782

Departure and arrival time convenience

1.00

.702

Ease of online booking

1.00

.488

Check-in service

1.00

.468

Online boarding

1.00

.640

Gate location

1.00

.644

On-board service

1.00

.634

Seat comfort

1.00

.872

Leg-room service

1.00

.505

Cleanliness

1.00

.705

Food and drinks

1.00

.871

Inflight WIFI Service

1.00

.621

In-flight entertainment

1.00

.721

Baggage handling

1.00

.829

The extraction method provides the strength of the relationship between satisfaction variables and customer satisfaction. Based on the extraction analysis, it can be seen that Food and drinks and seat comfort have the strongest relationship with customer ratings as compared to other variables.

Table 5. ANOVA

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

1.340

3

.447

2.478

0.047b

Residual

6.490

36

.180

Total

7.831

39

Dependent Variable: Rating

Predictors: flight delay, departure delay, departure and arrival time convenience, ease of online booking, check-in service, online boarding, gate location, seat comfort, cleanliness, food and drinks, legroom service, in-flight WIFI, and in-flight entertainment.

4. Results and Discussion

The research aimed at determining the factors that affect the satisfaction of travelers when using airplanes. The data for the research has been extracted from the Brazilian public dataset. The data has been analyzed using SPSS Software regression analysis, descriptive analysis, extraction method, and using ANOVA. The research and analysis have been done based on the findings in the literature review. The main objective of the study has been achieved. Factor analysis has been used to reduce the number of factors from a huge number of variables. According to factor analysis, seat comfort is the variable with the highest rating for customer satisfaction as compared to other variables.

The regression table presents the relationship between the dependent variables and independent variables. According to the analysis, it can be seen that Age, departure delay, departure and arrival time convenience, ease of online booking, check-in service, online boarding, seat comfort, cleanliness, food and drinks, Inflight WIFI Service, Inflight entertainment, and baggage handling have a positive R which is an indication that they have a positive relationship with the rating. This also means that any increase in the quality of the variables increases the satisfaction of travelers while their decrease decreases the satisfaction of travelers. However, Flight distance, leg-room service, gate location, and onboard service do not affect rating highly since they have a negative value.

The extraction method shows that the main factor that affects the satisfaction of customers in airplanes is food and drinks, departure and arrival time convenience, seat comfort, and baggage handling respectively. It also indicates that flight distance and Inflight WI-FI Service affect the satisfactory of customers the least.

The Sig. value of the ANOVA analysis is 0.047 which is an indication that the model is statistically significant.

5. Conclusion

The purpose of this research was to determine the factors that affect customer satisfactory in aviation industry. The aim of the airline industry is to ensure that the passengers get quality services before they board the plane and on-board the planes. In every business the customer is always right hence in the aviation industry the airlines have to maintain quality services that satisfy the passengers to attract them again or recommend them to their friends and relatives. The customer rating has been used to represent the customer satisfaction based on different services offered by the airlines.

This research helps to understand the level of satisfaction of passengers and provides the most important factors that affect customer satisfaction. Therefore, airlines should understand all the factors that affect customer satisfaction as mentioned in this research and ensure that they provide services that satisfy the customers. The research has confirmed that the factors that affect customer satisfaction are that departure delay, departure and arrival time convenience, ease of online booking, check-in service, online-boarding, seat comfort, cleanliness, food and drinks, Inflight WIFI Service, Inflight entertainment and baggage, handling Flight distance, leg-room service, gate location and onboard service.


References

[1]. Akamavi et al. (2011). ‘Key determinants of passenger loyalty in the low-cost airline businesses. Tourism management, 46: 528– 45. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.07.010. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0261517714001423.

[2]. Anderson, Eugene, Claes Fornell and Roland Trust. (1997). ‘Customer Satisfaction. pdf

[3]. Balcombe, K, I Fraser and L Harris. (2009). ‘Consumer willingness to pay for inflight service and comfort levels.

[4]. Barrett, SD. (2004). ‘How do the demands for airport services differ between fullservice carriers and low-cost carriers?’ Journal of air transport management, 10(1): 33–39. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. jairtraman.2003.10.006 .

[5]. Bubalo, B and Gaggero. (2015). ‘Lowcost carrier competition and airline service quality in Europe $’. Transport policy, (2006), 1–9. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.015.

[6]. Clemes, MD, N Zealand C and Gan. (2008). ‘An empirical analysis of customer satisfaction in international air travel’. Innovative marketing, 4(2): 49–62.

[7]. Dennis, Nigel and Anne Graham. (2006). ‘Association for European Transport and Contributors 2006’, no. October 2004. Diaconu, L. (2012). ‘The evolution of the European low- Ryanair case study’, 62: 342–346. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.054.

[8]. Fourie, Colette and Berendien Lubbe. (2006). ‘Determinants of selection of full-service airlines and low-cost carriers—a note on business travellers in South Africa’. Journal of air transport management, 12 (2): 98–102. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.11.008. http://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0969699705001055.

[9]. Fre, D. (2006). ‘An analysis of European lowcost airlines and their networks’. Journal title??. 14: 249–264. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.08.005.

[10]. Han, U and N Khan. (2012). ‘Customer satisfaction in airline industry’. International proceedings of economics development and research, 55(36): 178–183. http://doi. org/10.7763/IPEDR.

[11]. O’Connell et al.(2005). ‘Passengers’ perceptions of low cost airlines and full service carriers: a case study involving Ryanair, Aer Lingus, Air Asia and Malaysia Airlines’. Journal of air transport management, 11(4): 259–72. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.01.007. http://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S096969970500013X.

[12]. Park, Jin-Woo. (2007). ‘Passenger perceptions of service quality: Korean and Australian case studies’. Journal of air transport management, 13(4): 238–42. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.04.002. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0.

[13]. Rey et al. (2011). ‘Effect of low-cost airlines on tourism in Spain. a dynamic panel data model’. Journal of air transport management, 17(3). Elsevier Ltd: 163–67. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2010.12.004.

[14]. Reynolds, L. (2005). Demand and Consumer Behavior, 1–17. Saha, G. (2009). ‘Service quality, satisfaction and behavioural intentions’. Managing service quality: an international journal, 19(3): 350–372. http://doi. org/10.1108/09604520910955348.

[15]. Williams, Richard. (2015). ‘Ordered Logit Model’, 1–17. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2012). Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. 5th edn. Mason: South-Western, Cengage Learning.


Cite this article

Wu,T. (2023). Research of Customer Satisfaction in Aviation. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,4,24-31.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Economic Management and Green Development (ICEMGD 2022), Part Ⅱ

ISBN:978-1-915371-17-1(Print) / 978-1-915371-18-8(Online)
Editor:Canh Thien Dang, Javier Cifuentes-Faura
Conference website: https://www.icemgd.org/
Conference date: 6 August 2022
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.4
ISSN:2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Akamavi et al. (2011). ‘Key determinants of passenger loyalty in the low-cost airline businesses. Tourism management, 46: 528– 45. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.07.010. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0261517714001423.

[2]. Anderson, Eugene, Claes Fornell and Roland Trust. (1997). ‘Customer Satisfaction. pdf

[3]. Balcombe, K, I Fraser and L Harris. (2009). ‘Consumer willingness to pay for inflight service and comfort levels.

[4]. Barrett, SD. (2004). ‘How do the demands for airport services differ between fullservice carriers and low-cost carriers?’ Journal of air transport management, 10(1): 33–39. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. jairtraman.2003.10.006 .

[5]. Bubalo, B and Gaggero. (2015). ‘Lowcost carrier competition and airline service quality in Europe $’. Transport policy, (2006), 1–9. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.015.

[6]. Clemes, MD, N Zealand C and Gan. (2008). ‘An empirical analysis of customer satisfaction in international air travel’. Innovative marketing, 4(2): 49–62.

[7]. Dennis, Nigel and Anne Graham. (2006). ‘Association for European Transport and Contributors 2006’, no. October 2004. Diaconu, L. (2012). ‘The evolution of the European low- Ryanair case study’, 62: 342–346. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.054.

[8]. Fourie, Colette and Berendien Lubbe. (2006). ‘Determinants of selection of full-service airlines and low-cost carriers—a note on business travellers in South Africa’. Journal of air transport management, 12 (2): 98–102. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.11.008. http://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0969699705001055.

[9]. Fre, D. (2006). ‘An analysis of European lowcost airlines and their networks’. Journal title??. 14: 249–264. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.08.005.

[10]. Han, U and N Khan. (2012). ‘Customer satisfaction in airline industry’. International proceedings of economics development and research, 55(36): 178–183. http://doi. org/10.7763/IPEDR.

[11]. O’Connell et al.(2005). ‘Passengers’ perceptions of low cost airlines and full service carriers: a case study involving Ryanair, Aer Lingus, Air Asia and Malaysia Airlines’. Journal of air transport management, 11(4): 259–72. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.01.007. http://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S096969970500013X.

[12]. Park, Jin-Woo. (2007). ‘Passenger perceptions of service quality: Korean and Australian case studies’. Journal of air transport management, 13(4): 238–42. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.04.002. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0.

[13]. Rey et al. (2011). ‘Effect of low-cost airlines on tourism in Spain. a dynamic panel data model’. Journal of air transport management, 17(3). Elsevier Ltd: 163–67. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2010.12.004.

[14]. Reynolds, L. (2005). Demand and Consumer Behavior, 1–17. Saha, G. (2009). ‘Service quality, satisfaction and behavioural intentions’. Managing service quality: an international journal, 19(3): 350–372. http://doi. org/10.1108/09604520910955348.

[15]. Williams, Richard. (2015). ‘Ordered Logit Model’, 1–17. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2012). Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. 5th edn. Mason: South-Western, Cengage Learning.