Download pdf
Study on the Impact of Employee Compensation and Benefits System on Employee Innovation and Optimization Strategy
- 1 Chengdu Foreign Language School
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The most direct and practical of the many incentive programs is compensation incentive, particularly total compensation incentive, which also has a high operability. Nevertheless, it is also constrained by the enterprise's overall viability and the cost of its human resources. More remuneration satisfaction does not always translate into better business performance; further research is needed to understand how it works. On the basis of an analysis of local and foreign research data, this paper investigates the connection between employee innovation performance and remuneration satisfaction. It also introduces work engagement as a mediating variable along the path of compensation satisfaction - work engagement - innovation performance. It has been established via empirical study and data analysis that employees' contentment with their salary and related factors can positively impact the link between that relationship and their innovation performance. It demonstrates that following the introduction of the new work engagement perspective, compensation management satisfaction affects innovation performance indirectly through the influence of work engagement. Through the in-depth exploration of its influence mechanism, it offers some guidance for the related enterprises to design the compensation system scientifically to motivate the innovation ability of employees and complements and improves the related theory.
Keywords
employee innovation, optimization strategy, employee compensation
[1]. Cannas R. Exploring digital transformation and dynamic capabilities in agrifood SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 2021: 1-27.
[2]. Zhu D, Xu B. Regional government R&D investment and innovation performance: the moderating effect of geographical and organizational proximities. International Journal of Innovation Science, 2022, 14(2): 230-246.
[3]. Ferreira J, Coelho A, Moutinho L. Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 2020, 92: 102061.
[4]. Greve H R. Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[5]. Cheng J, Zhao J, Zhu D, et al. Land marketization and urban innovation capability: Evidence from China. Habitat International, 2022, 122: 102540.
[6]. Liao G, Zhou J, Yin J. Effect of organizational socialization of new employees on team innovation performance: A cross-level model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2022: 1017-1031.
[7]. Wenchao, F. Executive Incentive, R&D Investment and Corporate Performance of Listed Companies in GEM. INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018: 1349.
[8]. Perrons R K. How innovation and R&D happen in the upstream oil & gas industry: Insights from a global survey. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2014, 124: 301-312.
[9]. Mazur K, Inków M. Methodological aspects of innovation performance measurement in the IT sector. Management, 2017, 21(2): 20-33.
[10]. Li X, Li S, Qiao J, et al. Leveraging the supply base for innovation: how does supply base management affect innovation performance? European Journal of Innovation Management, 2022 (ahead-of-print).
[11]. Cooper B, Wang J, Bartram T, et al. Well‐being‐oriented human resource management practices and employee performance in the Chinese banking sector: The role of social climate and resilience. Human Resource Management, 2019, 58(1): 85-97.
[12]. Naranjo-Valencia J C, Jiménez-Jiménez D, Sanz-Valle R. Studying the links between organizational culture, innovation, and performance in Spanish companies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 2016, 48(1): 30-41.
[13]. Prajogo D I, Ahmed P K. Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&d Management, 2006, 36(5): 499-515.
[14]. Cordero R. The measurement of innovation performance in the firm: an overview. Research policy, 1990, 19(2): 185-192.
[15]. Laursen K, Salter A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic management journal, 2006, 27(2): 131-150.
[16]. Lundvall B Å, Nielsen P. Knowledge management and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, 2007.
[17]. Inauen M, Schenker‐Wicki A. The impact of outside‐in open innovation on innovation performance. European journal of innovation management, 2011, 14(4): 496-520.
[18]. Muller E, Peres R. The effect of social networks structure on innovation performance: A review and directions for research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2019, 36(1): 3-19.
[19]. Gloet M, Terziovski M. Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of manufacturing technology management, 2004, 15(5): 402-409.
[20]. Sharma J P, Bajpai N. Salary satisfaction as an antecedent of job satisfaction: Development of a regression model to determine the linearity between salary satisfaction and job satisfaction in a public and a private organization. European Journal of Social Sciences, 2011, 18(3): 450-461.
[21]. Chaudhry M S, Sabir H M, Rafi N, et al. Exploring the Relationship between Salary Satisfaction: A Comparison of Public and Private Sector Organizations. Journal of Commerce (22206043), 2011, 3(4).
[22]. Mirowsky J. Depression and marital power: An equity model. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91(3): 557-592.
[23]. Tanveer Z, Lodhi R N. The effect of brand equity on customer satisfaction: An empirical study based on David Aaker's Brand Equity Model. IUP Journal of Brand Management, 2016, 13(3): 43.
[24]. Lee R, Wilbur E R. Age, education, job tenure, salary, job characteristics, and job satisfaction: A multivariate analysis. Human Relations, 1985, 38(8): 781-791.
[25]. Indrasari M, Purnomo B R, Yunus E, et al. The Effect of Salary Satisfaction, Work Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment to Work Intention. Journal Didaskalia, 2018, 1(1): 45-53.
[26]. Stuart C, Spence S, Filsinger D, et al. Characterizing the influence of impeller exit recirculation on centrifugal compressor work input. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2018, 140(1): 011005.
[27]. Chirwa E W, Matita M, Dorward A. Factors influencing access to agricultural input subsidy coupons in Malawi. 2011.
[28]. Pärli R. How input, process, and institutional factors influence the effects of transdisciplinary research projects. Environmental Science & Policy, 2023, 140: 80-92.
[29]. Fischer M, Maag S. Actors in forums: work input and different types of benefits. Journal of Public Policy, 2022, 42(3): 573-592.
[30]. Yu J, Yu Y, Jiang T. Structural factors influencing energy carbon emissions in China’s service industry: An input–output perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(32): 49361-49372.
Cite this article
Cui,H. (2023). Study on the Impact of Employee Compensation and Benefits System on Employee Innovation and Optimization Strategy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,31,19-30.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Economic Management and Green Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).