Research Article
Open access
Published on 1 December 2023
Download pdf
Ke,J. (2023). A Review of the Applicability of Pricing Models in the Stock Market. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,55,130-134.
Export citation

A Review of the Applicability of Pricing Models in the Stock Market

Junjie Ke *,1,
  • 1 Shanghai Nanyang Model private school

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/55/20230976

Abstract

The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) model has always been the core theory of asset pricing and is widely used in the world as a finance tool in the securities market, but it is not fully effective for the economic market due to the current state of development in some countries. This paper compares and analyses the CAPM model and its improved and alternative models based on existing literature and statistical data. This paper first explains the CAPM model, analyses its formula, and then describes the disadvantages and shortcomings of the CAPM model. Then it gives examples of other replaceable models, first explains those models, then lists the advantages of these models compared with the CAPM model as well as some of their shortcomings, and finally concludes through the comparison of these models to the CAPM model that although the CAPM model may not be applicable to the market in many cases, it can be replaced by other models, and even then there is no one-size-fits-all model that can replace all the market models, and conclusions need to be made on a case-by-case basis.

Keywords

CAPM, CCAPM, ICAPM, APT

[1]. Fabozzi, F. J., Gupta, F., & Markowitz, H. M. (2002). The legacy of modern portfolio theory. The journal of investing, 11(3), 7-22.

[2]. Harvey, C. R. (2017). Presidential address: The scientific outlook in financial economics. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1399-1440.

[3]. Fama, E. F., French, K. R. January, 1992. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns, pp. 427-465.

[4]. Jensen, M. C., Black, F., & Scholes, M. S. (1972). The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests.

[5]. Wang, K. Q. (2003). Asset pricing with conditioning information: A new test. The journal of finance, 58(1), 161-196.

[6]. Vergara-Fernández, M., Heilmann, C., & Szymanowska, M. (2023). Describing model relations: The case of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) family in financial economics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 97, 91-100.

[7]. Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of financial economics, 9(1), 3-18.

[8]. Kothari, S. P., Shanken, J., & Sloan, R. G. (1995). Another look at the cross‐section of expected stock returns. The journal of finance, 50(1), 185-224.

[9]. Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing, ʽJournal of Economic Theoryʼ.

[10]. Premanto, Gandar Candra dan Muhammad Madyan.” Perbandingan Keakuratan Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) dan Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) dalam Memprediksi Tingkat Pendapatan Saham Industri Manufaktur Sebelun dan Semasa Krisis Ekonomi,1991-2001”. Universitas Airlangga.

[11]. Kisman, Z., & Restiyanita, S. (2015). M. The Validity of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) in Predicting the Return of Stocks in Indonesia Stock Exchange. American Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 1(3), 184-189.

[12]. Delly.” Perbandingan Keakuratan Capital Asset Pricing Model CAPM) dan Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) dalam Memprediksi Return Saham yang Aktif di PT. Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) dan di Singapore Stock Exchange, 2001-2006”. Surabaya. Universitas Kristen Petra.

[13]. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 33(1), 3-56.

[14]. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of finance, 52(1), 57-82.

[15]. Breeden, D.T. (1979). An inter-temporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3), 265-296.

[16]. Javed, S., Aldalaien, B. A., Husain, U., & Khan, M. S. (2019). Impact of federal funds rate on monthly stocks return of United States of America. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(9), 105-113.

[17]. Albuquerue, R., & Wang, N. (2008). Agency conflicts, investment, and asset pricing. the Journal of Finance, 63(1), 1-40.

[18]. Chen, M. H. (2003). Risk and return: CAPM and CCAPM. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 43(2), 369-393.

Cite this article

Ke,J. (2023). A Review of the Applicability of Pricing Models in the Stock Market. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,55,130-134.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis

Conference website: https://www.icftba.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-157-5(Print) / 978-1-83558-158-2(Online)
Conference date: 8 November 2023
Editor:Javier Cifuentes-Faura
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.55
ISSN:2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).