Research Article
Open access
Published on 17 May 2023
Download pdf
Zhao,Q. (2023). Social Media Images' Visual Complexity Affects Consumers' Perceptions of Brands. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,5,741-746.
Export citation

Social Media Images' Visual Complexity Affects Consumers' Perceptions of Brands

Qicheng Zhao *,1,
  • 1 Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Canada

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/5/2022892

Abstract

Visual complexity can be defined as the number of elements in an image or object, as well as the level of detail they convey. The term 'highly visual complex' refers to images that contain a wide variety of elements within their basic visual elements, such as features, designs, and variations. Currently, with the advancement of modern technology and the popularity of social media, brands are paying more attention to their social media images. In order to capture the needs of the market with visual marketing, social media images' visual complexity has become a key concern for brands. In this study, case descriptions with two types of cases that have different levels of visual complexity are performed in order to generate comparisons and analyses. Brands need to judge the level of visual complexity according to their own positioning and design. Consequently, consumers are able to form a more accurate perception of the brand. This is how brands can win the favor of consumers.

Keywords

brand, social media, image, vision, visual complexity

[1]. Jang, J. Y., Baek, E., & Choo, H. J. (2018). Managing the visual environment of a fashion store. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 46(2), 210–226.

[2]. Palumbo, L., Ogden, R., Makin, A. D., & Bertamini, M. (2014). Examining visual complexity and its influence on perceived duration. Journal of Vision, 14(14), 3–3.

[3]. Gerlach, C., & Marques, J. F. (2014). Visual complexity exerts opposing effects on object categorization and identification. Visual Cognition, 22(6), 751–769.

[4]. Zhao, L., Lee, S. H., Li, M., & Sun, P. (2022). The use of social media to promote sustainable fashion and benefit communications: A data-mining approach. Sustainability, 14(3), 1178.

[5]. Reyneke, M., Pitt, L., & Berthon, P. R. (2011). Luxury wine brand visibility in social media: An exploratory study. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 23(1), 21–35.

[6]. Kujur, F., & Singh, S. (2020). Visual communication and consumer-brand relationship on social networking sites - uses & Gratifications Theory Perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(1).

[7]. Kusumasondjaja, S., & Tjiptono, F. (2019). Endorsement and visual complexity in food advertising on Instagram. Internet Research, 29(4), 659–687.

[8]. Seo, Y. W., Chae, S. W., & Lee, K. C. (2012). The impact of human brand image appeal on visual attention and purchase intentions at an e-commerce website. Intelligent Information and Database Systems, 1–9.

[9]. Su, Z., & Song, S. (2021). Translating tigers: The visual rhetoric of Fashion Communication in Kenzo's Logo. TEXTILE, 20(2), 198–215.

[10]. Phillips, B. J., McQuarrie, E. F., & Griffin, W. G. (2014). How visual brand identity shapes consumer response. Psychology & Marketing, 31(3), 225–236.

[11]. Isomura, K., & Huang, P.-Y. (2016). Muji's way to build a global brand: Integrating Value Communication into product and store development. Strategic Direction, 32(4), 8–11.

[12]. Si, S. (2015). Is Muji a no brand?. english.fju.edu.tw. Retrieved from: http://english.fju.edu.tw/word/LOD/105/401110016.pdf

[13]. YuQian Zheng, & YanMei Li. (2018). Visual Merchandising and Emotional Design. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 7(5), 39–45.

Cite this article

Zhao,Q. (2023). Social Media Images' Visual Complexity Affects Consumers' Perceptions of Brands. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,5,741-746.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022), Part 4

Conference website: https://www.icihcs.org/
ISBN:978-1-915371-35-5(Print) / 978-1-915371-36-2(Online)
Conference date: 18 December 2022
Editor:Matilde Lafuente-Lechuga, Muhammad Idrees
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.5
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).