Download pdf
Mechanisms Underlying the Effect of Passive Social Network Use (PSNU) on Subjective Well-being (SWB): The Mediating Role of Ruminative Thinking
- 1 Department of English, Hunan International Economic University, Hunan, China
- 2 Department of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
- 3 Department of English, Xi’an Peihua University, Xi’an, China
- 4 Department of Applied Psychology, Wenzheng College of Suzhou University, Suzhou, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
It is worth noting that the widespread popularity of smartphones has not only brought convenience to people, but also the SWB problem that comes with the PSNU has become a growing concern. In a survey of smartphone user groups, it was found that university students are the main force behind smartphone usage. Aiming to explore how the PSNU affects the perception of SWB through reflective thinking as well as to further understand the underlying mechanisms, this study used a questionnaire to survey 321 university students. The results found that: (1) There were significant negative predictive effects of passively using social network sites on SWB. (2) The passive usage of social network sites negatively affects university students' SWB by increasing their personal ruminative thinking. (3) PSNU also predicted life satisfaction through two mediating chains between ruminative thinking and emotions. This is achieved through a mediating chain between ruminative thinking and positive emotions as well as through a mediating chain between ruminative thinking and negative emotions. This study offers more proof of the PSNU has on college students' SWB and offers a solid theoretical framework for future research in cyber-psychology and, consequently, for effective behavioral education.
Keywords
Passive social network use, Ruminative thinking, SWB of individual, Emotion, Life satisfaction
[1]. Liu, Q., Q., Zhang, C., Y., Sun, X., J., Niu, G. F., & Zhou, Z., K. (2017). The relationship between passive social networking site use and subjective well-being. An analysis of the mediating effect. Journal of Psychological Science, 40(3), 678-684.
[2]. Chen, W., Fan, C.-Y., Liu, Q.-X., Zhou, Z.-K., & Xie, X.-C. (2016). Passive social network site use and subjective well-being: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 507-514.
[3]. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400-424.
[4]. Harrington, R., & Loffredo, D. A. (2010). Insight, rumination, and self-reflection as predictors of well-being. The Journal of Psychology, 145(1), 39-57.
[5]. Tran, T. B., & Joormann, J. (2015). The role of Facebook use in mediating the relation between rumination and adjustment after a relationship breakup. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 56-61.
[6]. Davila, J., Hershenberg, R., Feinstein, B. A., Gorman, K., Bhatia, V., & Starr, L. R. (2012). Frequency and quality of social networking among young adults: Associations with depressive symptoms, rumination, and Corumination. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(2), 72–86.
[7]. Selby, E. A., Franklin, J., Carson-Wong, A., & Rizvi, S. L. (2013). Emotional cascades and self-injury: Investigating instability of rumination and negative emotion. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(12), 1213–1227.
[8]. Felsman, P., Verduyn, P., Ayduk, O., & Kross, E. (2017). Being present: Focusing on the present predicts improvements in life satisfaction but not happiness. Emotion, 17(7), 1047–1051.
[9]. Ding, Q. (2017). The influence of social networking site use on adolescents' self-evaluation. Huazhong Normal University.
[10]. Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(3).
[11]. Diener, E. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
[12]. Chen, W. F., & Zhang, J. X. (2004). Structure and validity of the Chinese version of the positive/negative affect scale. Chinese Journal of Mental Health, (11), 763-765.
[13]. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: the self-concordance model. J Pers Soc Psychol, 76(3), 482-497.
[14]. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
[15]. Zhang, C. L., & Zhou, Z. K. (2018). The relationship between passive social networking site use, social anxiety, ruminative thinking, and adolescent depression: a moderated mediation effect analysis. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, (03), 490-493.
[16]. Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y. , Hogan, M. E., Whitehouse, W. G. , & Lapkin, J. B. (2000). The temple-wisconsin cognitive vulnerability to depression project: Lifetime history of axis psychopathology in individuals at high and low cognitive risk for depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(3), 403.
[17]. Wang, L., Shi, K., & Luo, D., Y. (2019). A study on the mechanism of work-family conflict and ruminative thinking on subjective well-being. Journal of Northeastern University: Social Science Edition, 21(5), 480-488.
[18]. Krasnova, H., Wenninger, H., Widjaja, T., & Buxmann, P. (2013). Envy on Facebook: A Hidden Threat to Users' Life Satisfaction? Wirtschaftsinformatik.
[19]. Wang, Y. (2022). The effect of passive social network use on middle school students' negative emotions: the mediating role of upward social comparison and ruminative thinking. Mental Health Education in Elementary and Secondary Schools, (24), 15-17.
[20]. Liu, Y. (2012). The relationship between neuroticism and life satisfaction: the chain mediating role of emotion and self-esteem. Psychological Science, (05), 1254-1260.
Cite this article
Guo,M.;Lyu,W.;Shen,X.;Wang,Y. (2023). Mechanisms Underlying the Effect of Passive Social Network Use (PSNU) on Subjective Well-being (SWB): The Mediating Role of Ruminative Thinking. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,7,12-22.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022), Part 6
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).