Download pdf
Educational Inequality: The Role of Digital Learning Resources
- 1 Shanghai American School Puxi, Shanghai, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The digital technologies employed in education have skyrocketed due to widespread online learning during the pandemic. Subsequently, the recent development has brought into question whether new digital learning resources – online tools that students can use to supplement their learning – challenge the century-old class inequality in education. As we return to face-to-face learning, it is critical to evaluate whether digital resources can be combined with conventional school resources to uplift students' academic achievement in low-income households. The methods of literature review of past papers and theoretical investigation are applied in this paper to discuss empirical observations and offer explanations. Sources of materials include the United States Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics. By synthesizing classical Bourdieu’s theory of capital and a nascent digital pedagogical framework, the author finds that, contrary to popular clamor, digital learning resources are not benefiting the lower class significantly. In fact, digital inequality is emerging from three compounding factors: access, surroundings, and the self. By discussing the learning environment, parents' background, self-regulation, and motivation, this paper not only underscores the interacting components that amount to the corruption of meritocratic education but also advances the inquiry into online resources and possible future pathways for the empowerment of low-income students.
Keywords
digital learning resources, online learning, low-income, inequality, digital divide
[1]. Khan Academy. (2013). Khan Academy. https://www.khanacademy.org/about/impact
[2]. Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180
[3]. Khan, I. A. (2018, February 24). 10 Top eLearning Resources That Help You Learn Anything Today. ELearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/top-elearning-resources-help-learn-anything-today-10
[4]. Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2020, April 29). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/
[5]. Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of Capital. Journal of Economic Sociology, 3(5), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2002-5-60-74
[6]. Wei, K.-K., Teo, H.-H., Chan, H. C., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2011). Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0273
[7]. Zhao, L., Cao, C., Li, Y., & Li, Y. (2022). Determinants of the digital outcome divide in E-learning between rural and urban students: Empirical evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic based on capital theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 130, 107177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107177
[8]. Pollack Ichou, R. (2018). Can MOOCs reduce global inequality in education? Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 26(2), 116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.05.007
[9]. Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Equity in online learning. Educational Psychologist, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597
[10]. NCES Blog | Students’ Internet Access Before and During the Coronavirus Pandemic by Household Socioeconomic Status. (2021, September 20). Nces.ed.gov. https://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/post/students-internet-access-before-and-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic-by-household-socioeconomic-status
[11]. Cisco. (2020, March 9). Cisco Annual Internet Report (2018–2023) White Paper. Cisco. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/executive-perspectives/annual-internet-report/white-paper-c11-741490.html
[12]. Khan Academy | Free Online Courses, Lessons & Practice. (n.d.). Khan Academy. https://khanacademy.org/
[13]. Ness, C. V., & Varn, J. (2021, July 29). Governors Prioritize Expanding Internet Access for K-12 Students. National Governors Association. https://www.nga.org/news/commentary/governors-prioritize-expanding-internet-access-for-k-12-students/#:~:text=Prior%20to%20the%20pandemic%2C%20Governors
[14]. Darling-Hammond, L. (1998, March 1). Unequal Opportunity: Race and Education. Brookings; The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/unequal-opportunity-race-and-education/
[15]. OSP Technical Report - College Board Research. (2020). Research.collegeboard.org. https://research.collegeboard.org/reports/sat-suite/osp-technical-report
[16]. Molla, R. (2021, June 3). Good internet service is still a luxury in the U.S. Vox. https://www.vox.com/recode/22463131/pew-broadband-internet-income-inequality
[17]. York, C. C. of N. (2021, July 8). New Data Shows How Digital Inequality Affects Lower-Income Students and Their Families | Family & Community Engagement. Carnegie Corporation of New York. https://www.carnegie.org/our-work/article/new-data-shows-how-digital-inequality-affects-lower-income-students-and-their-families/
[18]. Aguilar, S. J., Galperin, H., Baek, C., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). When school comes home: How low-income families are adapting to distance learning. USC Rossier School of Education. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/su8wk
[19]. Farooq, N., Khan, F., & Begum, M. (2019). Pakistan Journal of Distance & Online Learning Relationship between Students’ Home Environment and their Academic Achievement at Secondary School Level Maryum Imad. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1266643.pdf
[20]. Watson, J. B. (1994). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 101(2), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.101.2.248
[21]. Katz, V. S., Moran, M. B., & Ognyanova, K. (2017). Contextualizing connectivity: how internet connection type and parental factors influence technology use among lower-income children. Information, Communication & Society, 22(3), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1379551
[22]. Cohen, J. (1987). Parents as Educational Models and Definers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(2), 339. https://doi.org/10.2307/352304
[23]. Greenhow, C. (2011). Online social networks and learning. On the Horizon, 19(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111107663
[24]. Aguilar, S. J. (2020). Guidelines and tools for promoting digital equity. Information and Learning Sciences, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-04-2020-0084
[25]. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
[26]. Li-Grining, C. P., Stockdale, L., Cunningham, A., Bradley, K., Papadakis, J. L., Flores-Lamb, V., Marcus, M., & Radulescu, M. (2022). Self-Regulation and Academic Achievement from Early to Middle Childhood Among Children in Low-Income Neighborhoods. Early Education and Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2106768
[27]. Bureau, U. C. (2022, September 13). Income in the United States: 2021. Census.gov. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2022/demo/p60-276.html
[28]. Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital Inequality Differences in Young Adults’ Use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321782
[29]. Becker, B. E., & Luthar, S. S. (2002). Social-Emotional Factors Affecting Achievement Outcomes Among Disadvantaged Students: Closing the Achievement Gap. Educational Psychologist, 37(4), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3704_1
[30]. SuperFriendly. (2018). Leveling the Playing Field. 2018.Khanacademyannualreport.org. https://2018.khanacademyannualreport.org/leveling-the-playing-field/#equal-access
[31]. Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J. (2004). A Personalization Effect in Multimedia Learning: Students Learn Better When Words Are in Conversational Style Rather Than Formal Style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.389
[32]. Bernstein, B. (2003). Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London Routledge.
Cite this article
Zhao,B.X. (2023). Educational Inequality: The Role of Digital Learning Resources. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,7,634-642.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022), Part 6
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).