A Comparison of Typical Green Building Evaluation Systems—Taking China, UK and USA as Examples

Xingyu Zhang

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/9/20230048

Research Article

Open access

Published on 14 September 2023

Download pdf

Zhang,X. (2023). A Comparison of Typical Green Building Evaluation Systems—Taking China, UK and USA as Examples. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,9,39-45.

Export citation

A Comparison of Typical Green Building Evaluation Systems—Taking China, UK and USA as Examples

Xingyu Zhang *^,1,

¹ Shandong Jianzhu university

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/9/20230048

Abstract

The international investigation of green buildings is steadily transitioning from simple concepts to practice, and the assessment criteria for enhancing green buildings are conducive to enhancing the understanding of green buildings' healthy development. By following the green building movement, this research examines the fundamental meanings of green building systems in China, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The paper analyzes a variety of potential new issues. For instance, the current green building assessment system has a small number of problems and limitations, and the formation of a system suitable for national conditions and flexible operation is currently a larger problem. Through analysis of the problem, the direction of work to implement the green building system and improve the fundamental concept of China's green building system will be suggested.

Keywords

green building, green building assessment system, evaluation methods, suggestions for improvement

View pdf

References

[1]. Xu ZJ，Zhao YZ．Current developments and outlook for green buildings [J]. Building technology，2012,43(4):300-304.

[2]. Zhou SJ , Suo JJ , Li YC . A Review of Research on Green Building Assessment Systems [J]. Journal of Hebei Engineering University (Social Science Edition),2012,29(04):37-39.

[3]. Zhi JQ ,Zhao J，Xin YJ．Green Building Evaluation System and its Theory at Home and Abroad Theoretical Analysis [J]. Urban Environment and Urban Ecology,2010,23(2):43-47.

[4]. Liu KC . Green Building System and its Research [J]. New buildings ,1997(04):11-13.

[5]. Ma JL , Wang DD. Current Status and Issues in Green Building Development in China [J]. Hainan Green Finance Institute.2021.

[6]. Lin Z ,Qin D. Analysis and Selection of Green Building Assessment Systems at Home and Abroad [J]. Housing industry,2011(05):20-23.

[7]. Zhu L. History and Reflections on the Development of Green Building Assessment System [J]. Wall Material Innovation and Building Energy Efficiency,2014(04):56-58.

[8]. Zhang MG, Shi CF. A Comparative Study of Typical Green Building Evaluation Systems at Home and Abroad [J]. Construction Economics,2016,37(08):76-80.

Cite this article

Zhang,X. (2023). A Comparison of Typical Green Building Evaluation Systems—Taking China, UK and USA as Examples. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,9,39-45.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies

Conference website: https://www.icsphs.org/

ISBN：978-1-915371-99-7(Print) / 978-1-83558-000-4(Online)

Conference date: 24 April 2023

Editor：Faisalabad Matilde Lafuente-Lechuga, Muhammad Idrees

Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

Volume number: Vol.9

ISSN：2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).