Principals’ Digital Leadership: Connotation Structure, Development Status, and Improvement Path

Jiaqi Hu

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/12/20230769

Research Article

Open access

Published on 26 October 2023

Download pdf

Hu,J. (2023). Principals’ Digital Leadership: Connotation Structure, Development Status, and Improvement Path. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,12,16-23.

Export citation

Principals’ Digital Leadership: Connotation Structure, Development Status, and Improvement Path

Jiaqi Hu *^,1,

¹ University of Sheffield

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/12/20230769

Abstract

The study of principals’ digital leadership plays a significant role in the digital management of schools as well as in improving the learning experience for students. This paper systematically researches the characteristics, connotations, and evaluation methods of digital leadership and discusses how it differs from information leadership, as well as the various dimensions that need to be considered when evaluating digital leadership. As a result of various researches on the connotations and evaluations of the principal’s digital leadership, this paper also aims to explore the different promotion paths based on our research. The paper demonstrates how digital leadership, which is an entirely distinct form of leadership that is transformed into a transformative leadership style, has a positive impact on educators, students, parents, and communities and that all levels of school systems need to take steps to ensure principals are held more accountable in the administrative and academic spheres.

Keywords

principal, digital leadership, evaluation dimensions, improvement path

View pdf

References

[1]. U.S. Department of Education (USDOE). (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national educational technology plan update. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. https://tech.ed.gov/netp/ [Google Scholar].

[2]. Department for Education (DfE). (2019). Realising the potential of technology in education: A strategy for education providers and the technology industry. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/realising-the-potential-of-technology-in-education [Google Scholar].

[3]. The Scottish Government. (2016, September 21). Enhancing learning and teaching through the use of digital technology: A digital learning and teaching strategy for Scotland. https://www.gov.scot/publications/enhancing-learning-teaching-through-use-digital-technology/ [Google Scholar].

[4]. Christine Greenhow, Cathy Lewin & K. Bret Staudt Willet (2021) The educational response to Covid-19 across two countries: a critical examination of initial digital pedagogy adoption, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30:1, 7-25, DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1866654.

[5]. Yusof, M. R., Yaakob, M. F. M., & Ibrahim, M. Y. (2019). Digital leadership among school leaders in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(9), 1481–1485. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.i8221.078919.

[6]. Hamzah, N. H., Nasir, M. K. M., & Wahab, J. A. (2021). The Effects of Principals' Digital Leadership on Teachers' Digital Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(2), 216-221.

[7]. Van Niekerk, E. J., & Van Wyk, M. M. (2014). Staff’s perceptions of vision and long-term principal leadership in South African schools: An exploratory study. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 406–414. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n4p406.

[8]. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2021). International technology standards for administrators. Retrieved from: https://my.iste.org/s/login/?ec=302&inst=1U&startURL=%2Fidp%2Flogin%3Fapp%3D0sp1U000000KzRe%26RelayState%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.iste.org%252Fsaml_login%26binding%3DHttpPost%26inresponseto%3D_b2343d5d57e597ada894 38745fc7de1a95a694c11f.

[9]. Damayanti, F. P., & Mirfani, A. M. (2021). An analysis of digital leadership in the pandemic Covid-19 Era. 526(Icream 2020). Paper presented at the In 4th International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2020).

[10]. Karahan, E., Canbazoğlu Bilici, S., & Ünal, A. (2015). Integration of media design processes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(60), 221-240. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.60.15.

[11]. Bernhardt, V. L. (2015). Toward systemwide change - educational leadership. Educational Leadership, 73(3), 56–61.

[12]. Sheninger, E. (2014). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. Paper presented at the INTED2019 Proceedings.

[13]. Aksal, F. A. (2015). Are headmasters digital leaders in school culture? Education and Science, 40(182), 77–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4534.

[14]. Bahtiar, R. A., Ibrahim, S., Ariffin, H., Ismail, N. H., & Isa, W. M. K. (2014). Educational goals and Agenda sustained during the Covid-19 movement control order. Retrieved from: https://iab.moe.edu.my/index.php/ms/sumber/menu-berita-pemberitahuan/69- pengumuman-2020.

[15]. Weber, Ellen, Eva-Helen Krehl, Marion Buettgen, and Karsten Schweikert. “The Digital Leadership Framework: Insights into New Leadership Roles Facing Digital Transformation.” Academy of Management Proceedings 2019, no. 1 (August 1, 2019): 13650. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2019.13650abstract.

[16]. Antonopoulou, Hera, Constantinos Halkiopoulos, Olympia Barlou, and Grigorios N Beligiannis. “Leadership Types and Digital Leadership in Higher Education: Behavioural Data Analysis from University of Patras in Greece.” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 19, no. 4 (April 30, 2020): 110–129. doi:10.26803/ijlter.19.4.8.

[17]. Kearsley, G., & Lynch, W. (1992). Educational leadership in the age of technology: The new skills. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25(1), 50-60.

[18]. Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., & Siraj, S. (2012). Factors affecting the transformational leadership role of principals in implementing ICT in schools. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 164-176.

[19]. Arokiasamy, A. R. A., Abdullah, A. G. K., & Ismail, A. B. (2014). Correlation between cultural perceptions leadership style and ICT usage school principals in Malaysia. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), 27-40.

[20]. Jameson, J. (2013). E-leadership in higher education: The fifth “age” of educational technology research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 889-915.

[21]. ISTE standards for Administrators (ISTE-A). (2009). National educational technology standards for administrators. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/Libraries/PDFs/ NETS_for_Administrators_2009_EN.sflb. ash x.

[22]. Richardson, J. W., Flora, K., & Bathon, J. (2013). Fostering a school technology vision in school leader. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8(1), 144-160.

[23]. Darrow, R. (2010). The bottom line: Funding online courses. School Administrator, 67(4), 26-30.

[24]. Lecklider, D., Clausen, J. M., & Britten, J. S. (2009). Principals priority for technology as an indicator of observed used in schools. Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 5(4), 27-33.

[25]. Banoglu, K. (2011). School principals’ technology leadership competency and technology coordinatiorship. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 208-213.

[26]. Metcalf, W., & LaFrance, J. (2013). Technology leadership preparedness: Principals’ perceptions. Journal of Research in Education, 23(1), 58-76.

[27]. Curnyn, M. A. (2013). Technology leadership conditions among Nebraska school principals (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. AAT 3607695).

[28]. Ritzhaupt, A. D., Hohlfeld, T. N., Barron, A. E., & Kemker, K. (2008). Trends in technology planning and funding in Florida K-12 public schools. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 3(8), 1-17.

[29]. Larson, L., Miller, T., & Ribble, M. (2009). Five considerations for digital age leaders: What principals and district administrators need to know about tech integration today. Learning & Leading with Technology,37(4), 12-15.

[30]. Garcia, A., & Abrego, C. (2014). Vital skills of elementary principal as a technology leader. Journal of Organizational Learning and Leadership, 12(1), 12-25.

[31]. Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. N. (2021). Associations between traditional and digital leadership in academic environment: During the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging Science Journal, 5(4), 405-428.

[32]. Hasin, I., & Nasir, M. K. M. N. (2021). The effectiveness of the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in rural secondary schools in Malaysia. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(1), 59-64. Available at: 10.20448/journal.509.2021.81.59.64.

[33]. Domeny, J. V. (2017). The relationship between digital leadership and digital implementation in elementary schools (Doctoral dissertation, Southwest Baptist University).

[34]. Zhong, L. (2017). The effectiveness of K-12 principal’s digital leadership in supporting and promoting communication and collaboration regarding CCSS implementation. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 10(2), 4.

[35]. Tibagwa, K. N., Onen, D., & Oonyu, J. (2016). Head teacher’s leadership styles and the quality of teacher support supervision. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(8), 63-78.

Cite this article

Hu,J. (2023). Principals’ Digital Leadership: Connotation Structure, Development Status, and Improvement Path. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,12,16-23.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries

Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/

ISBN：978-1-83558-049-3(Print) / 978-1-83558-050-9(Online)

Conference date: 7 August 2023

Editor：Javier Cifuentes-Faura, Enrique Mallen

Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

Volume number: Vol.12

ISSN：2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).