Conflict of Interest in the Value Judgement of Law of Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Game Theory

Yaxin Deng

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/14/20230933

Research Article

Open access

Published on 26 October 2023

Download pdf

Deng,Y. (2023). Conflict of Interest in the Value Judgement of Law of Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Game Theory. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,14,39-44.

Export citation

Conflict of Interest in the Value Judgement of Law of Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Game Theory

Yaxin Deng *^,1,

¹ Shenzhen University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/14/20230933

Abstract

Artificial intelligence’s intervention in judicial adjudication will lead to the alienation of adjudication process, which will lead to conflicts among different interest groups. This problem is especially prominent in the process of value judgment. The same case obtains the same judgment result, which is the core element of judicial justice. At the same time, the new legal system needs to emphasize the proper application of law and the just result of judgment. This requires the system to have flexible conflict rules to effectively balance the contradictory conflict. In the field of civil and commercial law, the introduction of game theory to solve the conflict of interest has a long precedent. Based on the Game Theory, according to certain legal premises, considering AI’s involvement in value judgment, an effective judgment result is finally obtained. This provides theoretical consideration for the structure of the subsequent specific legal system.

Keywords

Jurisprudence, game theory, algorithmic justice, judging, new technology and law

View pdf

References

[1]. Epps, Willie J. Jr. ,Warren, Jonathan M. (2020) Artificial Intelligence: Now Being Deployed in the Field of Law. Judges’ Journal, 59(1),16-19.

[2]. Morison, John, Harkens, Adam. (2019) Re-Engineering Justice: Robot Judges, Computerised Courts and (Semi) Automated Legal Decision-Making in Legal Studies. The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars, 39(4),618-635.

[3]. Simmons, Ric. (2018) Big Data, Machine Judges, and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Justice System in U.C. Davis Law Review, 52(2),1067-1118.

[4]. Swaminathan, Shivprasad (2016) Projectivism and the Metaethical Foundations of the Normativity of Law in Jurisprudence, 7(2), 231-266.

[5]. Patterson, Dennis (2003) Fashionable Nonsense in Texas Law Review, 81(3), 841-894.

[6]. Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica (2012) Social and Justified Legal Normativity: Unlocking the Mystery of the Relationship in Ratio Juris, 25(3), 409-434.

[7]. Morison, John, Harkens, Adam. (2019) Re-engineering justice? Robot judges, computerised courts and (semi) automated legal decision-making in Legal Studies ,39, 618-635.

[8]. Morison, John, Harkens, Adam. (2019) Re-engineering justice? Robot judges, computerised courts and (semi) automated legal decision-making in Legal Studies ,39, 618-635.

[9]. Bojanic, Ivana Barkovic, Eres, Maja. (2013) Game Theory and Law in Pravni Vjesnik,29(1), 59-76.

[10]. Arfi, Badredine (2006) Linguistic Fuzzy-Logic Game Theory in Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(1), 28-57.

Cite this article

Deng,Y. (2023). Conflict of Interest in the Value Judgement of Law of Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Game Theory. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,14,39-44.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries

Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/

ISBN：978-1-83558-053-0(Print) / 978-1-83558-054-7(Online)

Conference date: 7 August 2023

Editor：Javier Cifuentes-Faura, Enrique Mallen

Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

Volume number: Vol.14

ISSN：2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).