
Analysis of the Impact of Single-Sex Education on Female Mathematics Anxiety
- 1 Wenzhou-Kean University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Mathematics anxiety (MA) is the most common phenomenon in students’ study lives, and gender differences exist. Studying MA can play a supporting role in mathematics courses, including the difficulty of test questions and course design.The main objective of this paper has attempted to analyze the impact of single-sex education on female Mathematics Anxiety (MA), particularly research on the relationship between gender stereotypes and female MA. The literature reviews focusing on the causes of MA, the mechanism of MA affecting gender differences, MA levels and mathematics education under single-sex education, as well as the relationship between gender stereotypes and MA can show single-sex education plays a positive role in reducing female MA to a certain extent. This research is expected to improve public education and reduce sexism and gender stereotypes based on understanding the beneficial effects of single-sex education on women.
Keywords
mathematics anxiety, single-sex education, gender stereotype
[1]. Commodari, E., & La Rosa, V. L. (2021). General academic anxiety and math anxiety in primary school. The impact of math anxiety on calculation skills. Acta psychologica, 220, 103413.
[2]. Luttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology research and behavior management, 311-322.
[3]. Szucs, D., & Mammarella, I. (2020). Math anxiety.
[4]. Devine, A., Fawcett, K., Szűcs, D., & Dowker, A. (2012). Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety. Behavioral and brain functions, 8, 1-9.
[5]. Carey, E., F. Hill, A. Devine & D. Szücs. 2016. The chicken or the egg? The direction of the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance. Front. Psychol. 6: 1987.
[6]. Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60 years?. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 508.
[7]. Hellhammer, D., Wüst, S., and Kudielka, B. M. (2009). Salivary cortisol as a biomarker in stress research. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34, 163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.026.
[8]. Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., and McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81, 322–331. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322.
[9]. Chapman, B. P., Duberstein, P. R., Sörensen, S., and Lyness, J. M. (2007). Gender differences in five factor model personality traits in an elderly cohort: extension of robust and surprising findings to an older generation. Pers. Individ. Dif. 43, 1594–1603. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.028.
[10]. Park, G. P., and French, B. F. (2013). Gender differences in the foreign language classroom anxiety scale. System 41, 462–471. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.04.001.
[11]. Yeung, N.C.J. & C. Von Hippel. 2008. Stereotype threat increases the likelihood that female drivers in a simulator run over jaywalkers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 40: 667–674.
[12]. Rossi, S., Xenidou‐Dervou, I., Simsek, E., Artemenko, C., Daroczy, G., Nuerk, H. C., & Cipora, K. (2022). Mathematics–gender stereotype endorsement influences mathematics anxiety, self‐concept, and performance differently in men and women. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1513(1), 121-139.
[13]. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological review, 109(3), 573.
[14]. Sadker, D., & Zittleman, K. (2004, April 8). Single-sex schools: A good idea gone wrong? The Christian Science Monitor, p. 9. Retrieved from http://www.sadker.org/PDF/SingleSexSchools.pdf.
[15]. Cherney, I. D., & Campbell, K. L. (2011). A league of their own: Do single-sex schools increase girls’ participation in the physical sciences?. Sex roles, 65, 712-724.
[16]. Belcher, C., Frey, A., & Yankeelov, P. (2006). The effects of single-sex classrooms on classroom environment, self-esteem, and standardized test scores. School Social Work Journal, 31, 61–75.
[17]. Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. Journal of experimental social psychology, 38(2), 194-201.
[18]. Yüksel-Şahin F: Mathematics anxiety among 4th and 5th grade Turkish elementary school students. Int Electronic J Math Educ. 2008, 3: 179-192.
[19]. Bekdemir, M. (2010). The pre-service teachers’ mathematics anxiety related to depth of negative experiences in mathematics classroom while they were students. Educational studies in mathematics, 75(3), 311-328.
[20]. Ma, X., & Xu, J. (2004). The causal ordering of mathematics anxiety and mathematics achievement: a longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of adolescence, 27(2), 165-179.
[21]. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379-440). Academic Press.
[22]. Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007). Implicit stereotypes and women’s math performance: How implicit gender-math stereotypes influence women’s susceptibility to stereotype threat. Journal of experimental social psychology, 43(5), 825-832.
[23]. Johns, M., Schmader, T., and Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychol. Sci. 16, 175–179. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00799.x.
[24]. Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., and Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1860–1863.
[25]. Dowker, A., Bennett, K., and Smith, L. (2012). Attitudes to mathematics in primary school children. Child Dev. Res. 2012:124939. doi: 10.1155/2012/124939.
[26]. Wu, S. S., Barth, M., Amin, H., Malcarne, V., and Menon, V. (2012). Math anxiety in second and third graders and its relation to mathematical achievement. Front. Dev. Psychol. 3:162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00162.
[27]. Arigbabu, A. A., Balogun, S. K., Oladipo, S. E., Ojedokun, O. A., Opayemi, S. A., Enikanoselu, O. A., ... & Oluwafemi, O. J. (2012). Examining Correlates of Math Anxiety Among Single-Sex & Co-Educational Schools in Nigeria. Global Journal of Human Social Science Linguistics & Education, 12(10), 1-14.
[28]. Doris, A., O’Neill, D., & Sweetman, O. (2013). Gender, single-sex schooling and maths achievement. Economics of Education Review, 35, 104-119.
[29]. Schneeweis, N., & Zweimüller, M. (2012). Girls, girls, girls: Gender composition and female school choice. Economics of Education review, 31(4), 482-500.
[30]. Sullivan, A., Joshi, H., & Leonard, D. (2010). Single-sex schooling and academic attainment at school and through the lifecourse. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 6-36.
[31]. Lynch, K., & Lodge, A. (2002). Equality and power in schools: redistribution, recognition, and representation. Psychology Press.
[32]. Prendergast, M., & O’Donoghue, J. (2014). Influence of gender, single-sex and co-educational schooling on students’ enjoyment and achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(8), 1115-1130.
[33]. Maloney, E. A., Schaeffer, M. W., & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Mathematics anxiety and stereotype threat: Shared mechanisms, negative consequences and promising interventions. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(2), 115-128.
[34]. Beilock, S.L., Rydell, R.J. and McConnell, A.R. 2007. Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spill over. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136: 256–76.
[35]. Halpern, D. F., Eliot, L., Bigler, R. S., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Hyde, J., ... & Martin, C. L. (2011). The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling. Science, 333(6050), 1706-1707.
[36]. Kessels, U., & Hannover, B. (2008). When being a girl matters less: Accessibility of gender‐related self‐knowledge in single‐sex and coeducational classes and its impact on students’ physics‐related self‐concept of ability. British journal of Educational psychology, 78(2), 273-289.
[37]. Bigler, R. S., & Signorella, M. L. (2011). Single-sex education: New perspectives and evidence on a continuing controversy. Sex roles, 65, 659-669.
[38]. Ashcraft, M. H., and Ridley, K. S. (2005). “Math anxiety and its cognitive consequences: a tutorial review,” in Handbook of Mathematical Cognition, ed J. I. D. Campbell (New York, NY: Psychology Press) 315–327.
[39]. Jameson, M. M. (2014). Contextual factors related to math anxiety in second-grade children. J. Exp. Educ. 82, 518–536.
[40]. Maloney, E. A., Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., and Beilock, S. L. (2015). Intergenerational effects of parents’ math anxiety on children’s math achievement and Anxiety. Psychol. Sci. 26, 1480–1488.
Cite this article
Wang,S. (2023). Analysis of the Impact of Single-Sex Education on Female Mathematics Anxiety. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,15,21-27.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).