Research Article
Open access
Published on 26 October 2023
Download pdf
Liu,R. (2023). The Origins of Slut-shaming Phenomenon in High School Campus. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,16,38-46.
Export citation

The Origins of Slut-shaming Phenomenon in High School Campus

Ruotong Liu *,1,
  • 1 The Affiliated High School of Peking University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/16/20231101

Abstract

The present study examines the pervasive issue of slut-shaming, a phenomenon characterized by the disparaging and evaluative treatment of adolescent females who are deemed to engage in sexual behavior or have multiple sexual partners, frequently predicated on hearsay and conjecture. The objective of this study is to examine the occurrence of slut-shaming in high school settings and to ascertain the potential social, cultural, and psychological determinants that may impact this conduct. The researcher undertook a qualitative investigation of the occurrences of slut-shaming among high school students and formulated approaches aimed at averting and addressing the issue. According to the research, slut-shaming is a widespread problem that impacts adolescents globally, leading to adverse outcomes such as diminished self-worth, psychological distress, and social exclusion among the victims. The ramifications of engaging in slut-shaming behavior can be severe. Despite the negative impact it has on individuals, this practice persists in high school settings, and there is limited comprehension regarding the underlying factors that contribute to its prevalence. The study concludes by employing a semi-structural interview technique to examine the fundamental elements of female-oriented stigma that arise from “slut-shaming.” The aim is to promote a secure and supportive atmosphere for all students, devoid of the detrimental consequences of slut-shaming.

Keywords

gender stereotype, gender difference, slut-shaming, adolescents

[1]. England, P., & Bearak, J. (2014). The sexual double standard and gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex among U.S. university students. Demographic Research, 30(1), 1327-1338.

[2]. Baumeister, R. F., Twenge, J. M., & Nuss, C. K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 817–827.

[3]. Fisher, M., Cox, A., Bennett, S., & Gavric, D. (2012). Sexist attitudes and casual sex behavior among men. Journal of Social Psychology, 152(5), 621–643.

[4]. Clutton-Brock T. (2017). Reproductive competition and sexual selection. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 372(1729), 20160310.

[5]. Andersson, M., & Iwasa, Y. (1996). Sexual selection. Trends in ecology & evolution, 11(2), 53–58.

[6]. Wiley, R.H., & Poston, J.P. (1996). Perspective: Indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of sexes. Evolution, 50.

[7]. Vaillancourt, T., Sharma, A., Fawcett, N., & Boisvert, E. (2013). “The impact of adolescent girls’ sexual experiences and schooling perceptions on sexual health outcomes: A prospective analysis.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(10), 1513-1525.

[8]. Golom, F. D., Fossum, K. L., Cannon, J. A., & Cattaneo, L. B. (2018). “It’s easier to be a virgin than a slut”: How high school girls understand sexuality and negotiate slut-shaming. Sex Roles, 79(11-12), 732-746.

[9]. O’Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(12), 1718-1729.

[10]. Anne Campbell (2013) Mutual Mate Choice: Sexual Selection Versus Sexual Conflict, Psychological Inquiry, 24:3, 178-182.

[11]. Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., Apple, K. J., Clark, J. K., & Karwoski, R. (2014). The language of slut: A feminist analysis. Women’s Studies in Communication, 37(1), 1-22.

[12]. Szymanski, D. M., & Gupta, A. (2009). Examining the relationship between multiple internalized oppressions and African American lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning persons’ self-esteem and psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(1), 110–118.

[13]. Smiler, A. P., & Epstein, M. (2010). Hegemonic masculinity’s relationship to sexual jealousy, control, and aggression. Sex Roles, 62(11-12), 908-920.

[14]. Ferrante, J., & Russell, E. (2019). Gender, Sexuality, and Schools: A Sociological Approach. Routledge.

[15]. Prickett, K. C., & Martin, J. I. (2018). How Comprehensive Sexuality Education Can Help Reduce Sexual Violence. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 13(3), 267-281.

Cite this article

Liu,R. (2023). The Origins of Slut-shaming Phenomenon in High School Campus. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,16,38-46.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries

Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-057-8(Print) / 978-1-83558-058-5(Online)
Conference date: 7 August 2023
Editor:Javier Cifuentes-Faura, Enrique Mallen
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.16
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).