Download pdf
Analysis of Copyright Protection Issues for Characters in Works
- 1 China University of Political Science and Law
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The use of characters in various types of prior works in modern society has raised questions about whether characters can be regarded as subjects of copyright. Based on copyright legislation and jurisprudence, regardless of the type or scale, the determination of whether any intellectual creation is eligible for copyright protection rests solely on the criteria of originality and replicability, unrelated to factors such as the commercial value of the characters. Various standards applicable to the issue of copyrightability of characters, as practiced in both Chinese and American judicial contexts, emphasize the consideration of specific descriptive elements inherent in characters. Guided by the "idea-expression dichotomy" principle, deconstructing characters reveals that only when characters are concretely and adequately described, and when they have transcended the realm of conceptual ideas to constitute an expression of originality, can they independently become subjects of copyright separate from the work they originate in. The protection and use of characters in works should respect the objective laws of cultural creation, inheritance, and development, in order to ultimately achieve the fundamental principles and goals of copyright legislation.
Keywords
characters, idea, expression, originality, copyright
[1]. Lin, Y.-N., & Song, J. (2003). Legal models for protecting virtual characters in the United States and their reference. Journal of Guangxi Management Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 18(5).
[2]. Zhang, J.-H. (Ed.), Liu, X.-W., & Yao, X.-H. (Associate Eds.). (2000). Principles of civil law (3rd revised ed., Vol. 2). China University of Political Science and Law Press.
[3]. Regulations for the Implementation of the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China (2013, 2nd revision).
[4]. Yuan, X.-T. (2017). Misconceptions about intellectual property issues in fan works: From the perspective of the Jin Yong vs. Jiangnan case. Electronic Intellectual Property, 1-2.
[5]. Zheng, C.-S. (2016). Copyright law (Vol. 1). Social Sciences Academic Press.
[6]. Satava v. Lowry, 323 F. 3d 805 (9th Cir. 2003).
[7]. Lu, H.-J. (2008). Copyright protection of characters: A perspective on character protection in the United States. Intellectual Property, 6.
[8]. Lu, T. (2016). Copyright protection for virtual characters in the United States. World Outlook, 4.
[9]. United States Copyright Act (1976).
[10]. Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) (Amended on January 23, 2017).
[11]. Perfect World (Beijing) Software Co., Ltd., et al. v. Minghe Publishing Co., Ltd., et al. (2014), 1st Intermediate People's Court of China, Case No. 5146.
[12]. Perfect World (Beijing) Software Technology Development Co., Ltd. v. Hangzhou Lookout Network Co., Ltd., et al. (2017), Beijing No. 0108 Intermediate People's Court, Case No. 11754.
[13]. Beijing Changyou Tianxia Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Moonwalk Game Network Co., Ltd., et al. (2016), Beijing No. 0108 Intermediate People's Court, Case No. 24848.
[14]. Kunlun Wanwei Technology Co., Ltd., et al. v. 2nd Instance of Infringement of Adaptation Rights and Unfair Competition Disputes (2018), Beijing Final People's Court, Case No. 226.
[15]. Wen, R.-A., v. Beijing Playcrab Technologies Co., Ltd. (2015), No. 32202, 1st Intermediate People's Court of Hainan.
[16]. Guangzhou NetEase Computer System Co., Ltd., et al. v. Beijing Dashenquan Culture Technology Co., Ltd. (2019), Beijing No. 73 Intermediate People's Court, Case No. 1410.
[17]. Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corp., 45 F. 2d 119 (2d Cir. 1930).
[18]. Salinger v. Colting, 641 F. Supp. 2d 250, 254 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
[19]. Warner Bros. Pictures v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 216 F. 2d 945 (9th Cir. 1954).
[20]. Shanghai Xuanting Entertainment Information Technology Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Xinhua Pioneer Culture Media Co., Ltd., et al. (2015), 3rd People's Court of Shanghai, Case No. 838.
[21]. DC Comics v. Towle, 989 F. Supp. 2d 948 (C.D. Cal. 2013).
[22]. Walt Disney Productions v. Air Pirates, 581 F. 2d 751, 755 (1978).
[23]. Song, H.-X. (2016). Copyright issues in the use of character images in fan fiction: Legitimacy of borrowing virtual characters based on the Jin Yong vs. Jiangnan case. Electronic Intellectual Property, 12.
[24]. Jiangsu Sanmao Group Co., Ltd. v. Feng, C.-Y., Zhang, R.-R., et al. (1997), No. 48, High People's Court of Shanghai.
[25]. Jin Yong v. Jiangnan & "Youths in This World" Infringement Case (2018), Guangdong High People's Court, Case No. 3169.
[26]. Long W.-M. (2016). The cultural layering function of fan works and their relationship with the legal interests of prior works in competition law: Taking 'The Boy in This World' as an example". Electronic Intellectual Property, 12.
Cite this article
Yang,Y. (2023). Analysis of Copyright Protection Issues for Characters in Works. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,20,1-8.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).