Download pdf
Gender Inequality in the Digital Field and Potential Remedial Measures
- 1 New York University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper examines the phenomenon of gender inequality in digital spaces and explores potential remedial measures. Through an analysis of historical cases of online discrimination, gendered experiences on the internet, and current landscape of discriminatory behavior, it is clear that women are frequently exposed to cyber bullying and other forms of abuse. Strategies for promoting gender equity in digital spaces include self-regulation, education and awareness, state legislation, and industry practices. Surveillance capitalism’s impact on gender equity is also discussed, as data collected through this practice can be used to profile individuals based on their gender identity or sexuality. The paper concludes by stating that research into the efficacy of self-regulation, education and awareness approaches as well as state legislation in shielding women from online discrimination is necessary. Additionally, industry practices targeting those who battle discrimination should be further investigated. By utilizing such methods, one can move towards an equitable digital space where all individuals are respected regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation.
Keywords
gender inequality, digital spaces, self-regulation, education and awareness
[1]. Kabeer, Naila. “Gender Equality, Inclusive Growth, and Labour Markets.” Women’s Economic Empowerment. Routledge, 2021. 13-48.
[2]. Price-Dennis, Detra, and Yolanda Sealey-Ruiz. Advancing racial literacies in teacher education: Activism for equity in digital spaces. Teachers College Press, 2021. cyberdeviance (2020): 257-280.
[3]. Dlamini, Nobuhle Judy. “Gender-based violence, twin pandemic to COVID-19.” Critical Sociology 47.4-5 (2021): 583-590.
[4]. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. “Sexual harassment of women: climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine.” (2018).
[5]. Im, Jane, et al. “Women’s Perspectives on Harm and Justice after Online Harassment.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6.CSCW2 (2022): 1-23.
[6]. Dominelli, Lena. “Women and social action: social change through group activities and networks.” Women and Community Action. Policy Press, 2019. 77-106.
[7]. Erkmen, Özlem, Bora Ataman, and Barış Çoban. “Worsening Safety Conditions for Women Journalists in Turkey’s Alternative News Media.” Journalism Studies (2022): 1-19.
[8]. Bossler, Adam M. “Cybercrime legislation in the United States.” The Palgrave handbook of international cybercrime and cyberdeviance.
[9]. Jane, Emma A. “Online abuse and harassment.” The international encyclopedia of gender, media, and communication 116 (2020).
[10]. Salminen, Joni, et al. “Developing an online hate classifier for multiple social media platforms.” Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences 10 (2020): 1-34.
[11]. Banaji, Shakuntala, and Ramnath Bhat. Social media and hate. Taylor & Francis, 2022.
[12]. Gillespie, Tarleton. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press, 2018.
[13]. Leal, Suzette Lucia. The Role and Impact of Social Media in White Informal Settlements. University of Johannesburg (South Africa), 2020.
[14]. Firmino, Rodrigo, BRUNO CARDOSO, and Rafael Evangelista. “Hyperconnectivity and (Im) mobility: Uber and surveillance capitalism by the Global South.” Firmino, Rodrigo José, Bruno de Vasconcelos Cardoso, and Rafael Evangelista (2019): 205-212.
[15]. Wajcman, Judy, Erin Young, and Anna Fitzmaurice. “The digital revolution: Implications for gender equality and women’s rights 25 years after Beijing.” (2020).
[16]. Doucet, Andrea, and Lindsey McKay. “Fathering, parental leave, impacts, and gender equality: what/how are we measuring?.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy (2020).
[17]. Fidan, Ayça, and Süleyman Sadi Seferoğlu. “Online environments and digital parenting: an investigation of approaches, problems, and recommended solutions.” Bartin Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi 9.2 (2020): 352-372.
[18]. Mason, Gail, and Natalie Czapski. “Regulating cyber-racism.” Melbourne University Law Review 41.1 (2017): 284-340.
[19]. Grygiel, Jennifer, and Nina Brown. “Are social media companies motivated to be good corporate citizens? Examination of the connection between corporate social responsibility and social media safety.” Telecommunications policy 43.5 (2019): 445-460.
Cite this article
Nie,H. (2023). Gender Inequality in the Digital Field and Potential Remedial Measures. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,21,52-57.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).