Download pdf
Working Memory and Second Language Oral Production: A Five-Year Systematic Review
- 1 Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This article presents a comprehensive synthesis of the literature exploring the role of working memory in second language (L2) oral production. It systematically reviewed nine studies investigating the associations between working memory and L2 speaking, focusing on research foci, working memory measurement, speaking tasks, and performance. The synthesized results revealed a positive correlation between working memory and language production aspects, including accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency. Learners with stronger working memory demonstrated superior performance, particularly in complex tasks. However, some studies did not find a significant predictive relationship, possibly due to sample homogeneity, sampling heterogeneity, or task complexity. This systematic review sheds light on the crucial role of working memory in L2 oral production and provides valuable insights for language educators and researchers.
Keywords
working memory, second language oral production, systematic review
[1]. S. Li, “Working Memory and Second Language Learning,” in The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Psycholinguistics, 1st ed.New York: Routledge, 2022, pp. 348–360. doi: 10.4324/9781003018872-32.
[2]. S. Li and M. Fu, “Strategic and Unpressured Within-Task Planning and Their Associations with Working Memory,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 230–253, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1362168816684367.
[3]. H. Wang, Y. Zheng, and H. Xu, “An Overview of the Application of Working Memory in Interpreting Research,” Foreign Languages Research, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 70–74, 2017, doi: 10.13978/j.cnki.wyyj.2017.05.014.
[4]. A. Juffs and M. Harrington, “Aspects of working memory in L2 learning,” Lang. Teach., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 137–166, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1017/S0261444810000509.
[5]. O.-S. Lee and J. Park, “Understanding L2 Speech Production: Implications for Teaching Speaking in EFL Classroom,” J. Asia TEFL, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 808–823, Autumn 2020.
[6]. A. Awwad and P. Tavakoli, “Task complexity, language proficiency and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance,” IRAL Int. Rev. Appl. Linguist. Lang. Teach., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 169–196, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1515/iral-2018-0378.
[7]. Van Lang University, Vietnam, T. P. Duong, V. H. H. Le, and Van Lang University, Vietnam, “How Working Memory and Prior Vocabulary Knowledge Influence the Impact of Task Repetition on L2 Oral Performance: Insights into Vietnamese EFL Learners,” Teach. Engl. Second Foreign Lang. J.--TESL-EJ, vol. 26, no. 3, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.55593/ej.26103a12.
[8]. Chung-Ang University, J.-E. Hyun, and J.-H. Lee, “The Effects of Task Complexity and Working Memory on Korean Adult Learners’ English Speaking Performance,” Engl. Teach., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 115–134, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.15858/engtea.73.1.201803.115.
[9]. H. I. Park, M. Solon, C. Henderson, and M. Dehghan-Chaleshtori, “The Roles of Working Memory and Oral Language Abilities in Elicited Imitation Performance,” Mod. Lang. J., vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 133–151, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1111/modl.12618.
[10]. D. Simard, T. Molokopeeva, and Y. Q. Zhang, “The Contribution of Working Memory to L2 French Pronunciation among Adult Language Learners,” Can. Mod. Lang. Rev., vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 50–69, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.3138/cmlr.2018-0223.
[11]. M. Sadeghi and M. Pourhaji, “The contributions of working memory and pre-task explicit instruction to L2 oral performance,” System, vol. 96, p. 102409, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.system.2020.102409.
[12]. M. Cho, “Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance,” System, vol. 72, pp. 85–98, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.system.2017.10.010.
[13]. M. Daneman and P. M. Merikle, “Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 422–433, Dec. 1996, doi: 10.3758/BF03214546.
[14]. S. Li, “Working memory and second language writing: A systematic review,” Stud. Second Lang. Acquis., pp. 1–33, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1017/S0272263123000189.
[15]. J. A. Linck, P. Osthus, J. T. Koeth, and M. F. Bunting, “Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 861–883, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2.
[16]. A. Amari, Department of English, Faculty of Humanities, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran, B. Gorjian, and Department of English, Faculty of Humanities, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran, “The Effect of Eliciting Tasks on Listening Comprehension among Iranian Pre-Intermediate EFL Learners,” Int. J. Res. Engl. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 42–60, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.29252/ijree.4.2.42.
[17]. T. P. Alloway, S. E. Gathercole, and S. J. Pickering, “Verbal and Visuospatial Short-Term and Working Memory in Children: Are They Separable?,” Child Dev., vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1698–1716, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00968.x.
[18]. P. M. J. Engel De Abreu and S. E. Gathercole, “Executive and phonological processes in second-language acquisition.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 974–986, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0028390.
[19]. A. Baddeley, S. Gathercole, and C. Papagno, “The phonological loop as a language learning device.,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 158–173, 1998, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158.
Cite this article
Li,S. (2023). Working Memory and Second Language Oral Production: A Five-Year Systematic Review. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,22,35-44.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).