
The Development Path of Educational Cultural Diversity in the Context of Globalized Education
- 1 The Ohio State University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
In a world increasingly characterized by interconnectedness and cultural exchange, globalized education has become a central focus. This study delves into the crucial roles schools, students, and families play in fostering and promoting cultural diversity. The process model of intercultural competence emphasizes the significance of respect and openness to each other, underscoring the need for active engagement and understanding beyond superficial recognition. Schools should prioritize providing resources and training for educators to effectively teach with cultural response teaching, while students can enhance their intercultural competence by participating in cultural diversity-focused activities. Thus creating an environment where differences are not just acknowledged but celebrated. Moreover, families also play an indispensable role in emphasizing the importance of cultural diversity, as supporting the values of different backgrounds. Through this interplay between institutions, learners, and families, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the trajectory of educational cultural diversity in the context of globalized education.
Keywords
internationalization, culture diversity, globalization, intercultural competence, curriculums
[1]. Litz, D. (2011) Globalization and the changing face of educational leadership: Current trends and emerging dilemmas. International Education Studies, 4(3), 47-61.
[2]. Holon, I.Q. (2022). $196B International Education Market set to reach $433b by 2030 @ 7.4% CAGR. Global Impact Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.holoniq.com/notes/196b-international-education-market-set-to-reach-433b-by-2030
[3]. Deardorff, D. K., De Wit, H. and Heyl, J. D. (Eds.). (2012) The SAGE handbook of international higher education. Sage.
[4]. Colbert, P. J. (2010) Developing a culturally responsive classroom collaborative of faculty, students, and institution. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 3(9), 17-26.
[5]. Deardorff, D. K. (2006) Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266.
[6]. Banks, J. A. and Banks, C. A. M. (Eds.). (2019) Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives. John Wiley & Sons. Internet Archive.
[7]. UNESCO. Education Sector. (2014) Global citizenship education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century. UNESCo.
[8]. Knight, J. (2004) Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5-31.
[9]. Holm, G. and Zilliacus, H. (2009) Multicultural education and intercultural education: Is there a difference. Dialogues on Diversity and Global Education, 11-28.
[10]. Iborganization. (2023) Teaching more than one IB program. International Baccalaureate®. Retrieved from https://www.ibo.org/programmes/teach-more-than-one-ib-programme/
[11]. Will, M. and Najarro, I. (2022) What is culturally responsive teaching? Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/culturally-responsive-teaching-culturally-responsive-pedagogy/2022/04#glossary
[12]. Gay, G. (2018) Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
[13]. Adair, J. K. and Barraza, A. (2014) Preschool: Voices of Immigrant Parents in Preschool Settings. YC Young Children, 69(4), 32-39.
Cite this article
Liu,X. (2023). The Development Path of Educational Cultural Diversity in the Context of Globalized Education. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,29,22-27.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).