Download pdf
Interface Technologies applied for bionic prosthetic limbs
- 1 Shenzhen College of International Education, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518000
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
For a very long time, people have wished for a way to repair a broken limb and make it work again. The limbs are responsible for the vast majority of human movement, grasping, and other actions. If you lose them, your mental and physical health will suffer drastically. The quality of life for amputees continues to improve as new and better prosthetics are developed thanks to advancements in technology. Effective use of prostheses requires that they be at-tached to the user's natural body in some way. The development of prosthetic limbs, therefore, relies heavily on the findings of studies examining prosthetic limb interfaces. This paper pro-vides a summary of the research conducted on prosthetic interface technologies since 1985 through a method of literature review. The purpose of this paper is to provide a concise over-view of the current technologies employed in the field of prosthetic interfaces and to specu-late on the direction of future research and development in this area.
Keywords
Vibrotactile, Electrode interface, EMG, Prosthesis, Osseointegration
[1]. Gielen, C., van den Oosten, K., & Pull ter Gunne, F. (1985). Relation between EMG activation patterns and kinematic properties of aimed arm movements. Journal of motor behavior, 17 4, 421-42 .
[2]. Mendez, V., Iberite, F., Shokur, S., & Micera, S. (2021). Current Solutions and Future Trends for Robotic Prosthetic Hands.
[3]. Kyberd PJ, Hill W. 2011. Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 35:234–41
[4]. Mendez, V., Iberite, F., Shokur, S., & Micera, S. (2021). Current Solutions and Future Trends for Robotic Prosthetic Hands.
[5]. Gage GJ, Ludwig KA, Otto KJ, Ionides EL, Kipke DR. Naive coadaptive cortical control. J Neural Eng. 2005 Jun;2(2):52-63. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/2/006. Epub 2005 May 31. PMID: 15928412.
[6]. Hichert, M., & Plettenburg, D.H. (2018). Ipsilateral Scapular Cutaneous Anchor System: An alternative for the harness in body-powered upper-limb prostheses. Prosthetics and Orthotics In-ternational, 42, 101 - 106.
[7]. Smith, L.H., & Hargrove, L.J. (2013). Comparison of surface and intramuscular EMG pattern recognition for simultaneous wrist/hand motion classification. 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 4223-4226.
[8]. Schultz, A., Marasco, P.D., & Kuiken, T.A. (2009). Vibrotactile detection thresholds for chest skin of amputees following targeted reinnervation surgery. Brain Research, 1251, 121-129.
[9]. Li Y, Brånemark R. Osseointegrated prostheses for rehabilitation following amputation : The pioneering Swedish model. Unfallchirurg. 2017 Apr;120(4):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s00113-017-0331-4. PMID: 28229193; PMCID: PMC5371647.
[10]. Borton DA, Yin M, Aceros J, Nurmikko A. An implantable wireless neural interface for record-ing cortical circuit dynamics in moving primates. J Neural Eng. 2013 Apr;10(2):026010. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/2/026010. Epub 2013 Feb 21. PMID: 23428937; PMCID: PMC3638022.
[11]. Barrese JC, Rao N, Paroo K, Triebwasser C, Vargas-Irwin C, Franquemont L, Donoghue JP. Failure mode analysis of silicon-based intracortical microelectrode arrays in non-human pri-mates. J Neural Eng. 2013 Dec;10(6):066014. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/6/066014. Epub 2013 Nov 12. PMID: 24216311; PMCID: PMC4868924.
[12]. Thompson CH, Zoratti MJ, Langhals NB, Purcell EK. Regenerative Electrode Interfaces for Neural Prostheses. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2016 Apr;22(2):125-35. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2015.0279. Epub 2015 Nov 23. PMID: 26421660.
Cite this article
Gao,L. (2023). Interface Technologies applied for bionic prosthetic limbs. Theoretical and Natural Science,3,605-609.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Biological Engineering and Medical Science (ICBioMed 2022), Part I
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).