
Comparison between EAST and ITER tokamak
- 1 Beijing Luhe international academy
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of nuclear fusion, which is considered as an ideal energy source for the future, with emphasis on its theoretical foundation and tokamak device. In nuclear fusion, the mass of products is always less than the mass of reactants, and this “mass defect” is converted into enormous released energy. Scientists have proposed several ideas to reach such extreme conditions for nuclear fusion. Among these concepts, the tokamak device which uses magnetic fields to generate heat and confine high temperature plasma is probably the most promising one. Over the last half century, with the unremitting endeavor of building and operation a series of international tokamak projects, magnetic confinement fusion has made a lot of satisfactory successes. In this paper, two representative tokamak devices are discussed, which are International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) and Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST), about their major difference and similarities between them. ITER is constructed with the cooperation of many countries, and it is the largest tokamak project which targets to prove nuclear fusion is commercially feasible. EAST is another tokamak device which is located in China and made great achievements of magnetic confinement nuclear fusion, such as the record-breaking plasma temperature.
Keywords
Nuclear fusion, tokamak, EAST, ITER
[1]. LI Jian-Gang. The status and progress of tokamak research[J]. PHYSICS, 2016, 45(2): 88-97. doi: 10.7693/wl20160203
[2]. Borexino Collaboration. Neutrinos from the primary proton–proton fusion process in the Sun. Nature 512, 383–386 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13702
[3]. R.F. Post 1987 Nucl. Fusion 27 1579
[4]. P Helander et al 2012 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 54 124009
[5]. Kaname Ikeda 2010 Nucl. Fusion 50 014002
[6]. Wu, Songtao, and EAST team. “An overview of the EAST project.” Fusion Engineering and Design 82.5-14 (2007): 463-471.
[7]. Chinese Academy Of Science, https://www.cas.cn/jh/202201/t20220111_4821653.shtml
[8]. Mei, Z.H. 2018. Another Way for Making Artificial Minisun of Nuclear Fusion. Global Journal of Physics. 8(1),763-764
[9]. Aymar, R. (1997). The ITER project. , 25(6), 0–1195.
[10]. Chinese Academy Of Science, https://www.cas.cn/syky/202201/t20220104_4820592.shtml
Cite this article
Zhou,C. (2024). Comparison between EAST and ITER tokamak. Theoretical and Natural Science,43,162-167.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computing Innovation and Applied Physics
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).