1. Introduction
Advancements in prosthetic technology have significantly enhanced mobility and independence for individuals with limb loss, yet a critical challenge remains: the lack of natural tactile feedback. This limitation hampers the user's ability to perform tasks that require precise control and sensory perception, such as grasping delicate objects or adjusting grip strength dynamically. Tactile feedback plays an essential role in enabling prosthetic users to interact with their environment more naturally, particularly in tasks involving fine motor skills and complex hand movements.
Scholarly inquiry has recently concentrated on the fabrication of tactile sensors that replicate the human tactile experience by transmuting mechanical impetus into electrical impulses. Key technologies include piezoresistive, piezoelectric, and capacitive sensors, each offering unique benefits in sensitivity, response time, and energy efficiency. For instance, piezoelectric sensors made from polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) have demonstrated high sensitivity and rapid response, making them suitable for real-time feedback in prosthetic applications[1]. Additionally, capacitive sensors based on ionic gels and hydrogels have emerged as promising candidates due to their ability to detect subtle pressure changes and provide a more refined tactile feedback experience[2].
More advanced approaches, such as multimodal sensors and artificial skin technologies, have further enhanced the sensory capabilities of prosthetic devices. Multimodal sensors, capable of detecting pressure, shear, and torsional stresses, improve the precision of grasping delicate objects and prevent slippage during manipulation[2].The integration of these sensors with flexible, biocompatible materials, such as carbon nanotubes and ionic liquids, has enabled the development of artificial skin that closely replicates the tactile functions of human skin, offering a more evolved biointerface for intelligent prosthetics[3].
Moreover, brain-controlled prosthetics have become a focal point of innovation, as demonstrated by the integration of tactile and slip sensors in human-machine cooperative control systems. Such systems allow users to control their prosthetics through neural signals, providing real-time adjustments and precise control over movements. For instance, research has shown that brain-controlled prosthetics equipped with advanced tactile sensors can significantly enhance user interaction by dynamically adjusting grip force and responding to changing environmental conditions[4][5].
This treatise endeavors to canvass the contemporary standing of tactile sensor technology and its amalgamation within prosthetic instruments. By reviewing key developments, case studies, and technological innovations, this research highlights how these advancements can improve the quality of life for prosthetic users, offering them a more natural and intuitive interaction with their surroundings.
2. Tactile sensors for prosthetic devices
Tactile sensors are a critical component in the development of advanced prosthetic devices, enabling users to experience sensory feedback that mimics natural touch. These sensors convert physical stimuli into electrical signals, allowing prosthetics to detect pressure, texture, and movement. This section explores the various types of tactile sensors commonly used in prosthetic devices and their mechanisms for delivering tactile perception.
2.1. Types of tactile sensors
Several types of tactile sensors are employed in prosthetic devices, each offering unique capabilities:
2.1.1. Piezoresistive sensors
Piezoresistive sensors operate by registering alterations in electrical resistance in response to applied pressure. They are valued for their simplicity and ease of integration, making them a popular choice for basic tactile feedback in prosthetics. Piezoresistive sensors made from carbon-based nanomaterials, such as graphene and carbon nanotubes, are commonly used due to their high sensitivity and low power consumption, making them suitable for electronic skin applications in prosthetics[3].
2.1.2. Piezoelectric sensors
Piezoelectric sensors produce an electrical charge in response to mechanical deformation. They are highly sensitive and provide rapid response times, making them ideal for applications requiring real-time feedback. Piezoelectric materials, like polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), are frequently used in prosthetic devices due to their excellent electromechanical properties and flexibility[2].
2.1.3. Capacitive sensors
Capacitive sensors measure changes in capacitance due to applied force. Their high sensitivity to light touch and minimal power consumption make them suitable for fine tactile feedback applications. Recent advancements in ionic liquid-based capacitive sensors have enhanced the detection of subtle pressure changes, contributing to more refined and responsive tactile feedback systems in prosthetics[2].
2.1.4. Multimodal sensors
Multimodal sensors amalgamate diverse sensing modalities, such as pressure, shear force, and torsion, offering more comprehensive tactile feedback. Multimodal sensors are particularly useful in detecting complex interactions between prosthetic devices and objects, such as detecting grip force and preventing object slippage. The integration of nanomaterials, like carbon nanotubes and hydrogels, has further improved the performance of these sensors by providing enhanced stretchability and durability[2][3].
2.2. Functionality and mechanisms of tactile sensors
Tactile sensors function by transducing mechanical inputs, such as pressure or shear forces, into electrical signals. The key mechanisms involved include:
2.2.1. Pressure sensing
The majority of tactile sensors are engineered to detect variances in pressure exerted upon the prosthetic appendage. For instance, piezoresistive and capacitive sensors excel at measuring normal forces, providing the user with feedback on how much pressure is being applied to an object. Nanomaterials, like ionic gels and carbon composites, enhance the sensitivity and response speed of these sensors, making them highly effective for real-time applications in prosthetics[2].
2.2.2. Shear force detection
Advanced tactile sensors, such as multiaxial sensors, are capable of detecting not only normal forces but also shear forces, which occur when objects slip or rotate in the prosthetic's grasp. This is critical for providing more realistic and intuitive feedback. Recent developments in flexible tactile sensors using nanocomposites have significantly improved shear force detection, enhancing the overall user experience of prosthetic devices[3].
2.2.3. Nerve interfacing
Some tactile sensors are connected to the user’s nervous system via nerve interfaces, providing direct sensory feedback to the brain. This progressive approach enables the user to experience tactile sensation through the prosthetic, thereby enhancing their capacity for movement control and object interaction. Materials such as conductive hydrogels and ionic liquids are increasingly being used in nerve interfacing due to their biocompatibility and ability to mimic the properties of human skin[2]
3. Integration of tactile sensors with prosthetic systems
The integration of tactile sensors into prosthetic systems is crucial for enhancing user experience by providing natural and intuitive control. These sensors allow for real-time feedback, enabling prosthetic users to feel and interact with objects more effectively. This section explores the approaches used to integrate tactile sensors, focusing on nerve interfacing and multimodal sensor technologies.
3.1. Nerve interfacing for sensory feedback
Nerve interfacing is an advanced technique where tactile sensors are connected directly to the nervous system of the user. By using electrodes implanted in the muscles or nerves, the sensory data from the prosthetic can be sent to the brain, simulating the sensation of touch. This allows users to control their prosthetic limbs more naturally and adjust grip and pressure in real time[6].Non-invasive methods, such as surface electrodes, can also be used, though they provide less precise feedback compared to invasive nerve interfaces[7].
Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI) are among the most promising techniques for achieving this direct feedback loop. These systems aim to improve both motor control and sensory feedback, allowing the prosthetic user to perform tasks with higher precision[6].
3.2. Multimodal sensors and artificial skin technologies
Multimodal tactile sensors, which can detect multiple types of stimuli such as pressure, shear force, and temperature, represent a significant advancement in prosthetics. These sensors provide comprehensive feedback by integrating multiple sensing capabilities into a single system. For instance, sensors combining capacitive and resistive elements can simultaneously detect pressure and heat[8].
Artificial skin technologies further enhance the realism of prosthetic systems. Flexible and stretchable materials, like porous dielectric elastomers, offer high sensitivity and are capable of detecting fine mechanical stimuli, including subtle texture changes. These materials not only mimic the mechanical properties of human skin but can also be used to create systems that react to environmental changes, such as temperature, enhancing the prosthetic experience[8].
Recent progress includes the creation of machine learning-aided multifunctional tactile sensors that integrate harmoniously with prosthetic devices. These sensors not only detect force and temperature but can also classify materials based on their thermal and mechanical properties, providing users with detailed feedback about the objects they interact with[8] the combination of artificial skin and multimodal sensors enables prosthetic users to interact with their surroundings in a more natural and responsive manner, significantly enhancing the quality of life for amputees[4].
4. Case studies and applications
The development and integration of tactile sensors into prosthetic devices have led to significant advancements in their functionality and usability. This section delineates several case studies and applications that exemplify the tangible impact of these technologies on prosthetic devices.
4.1. Real-world examples of advanced prosthetics
One of the most notable applications of tactile sensors is in the development of advanced prosthetic hands that provide sensory feedback to the user. A study in 2021 by Schofield et al. demonstrated the use of a multimodal tactile sensor system in a bionic hand, allowing amputees to perceive sensations such as pressure, texture, and object slippage. This system integrated piezoresistive and capacitive sensors into a silicone-based artificial skin, enhancing the user’s ability to grasp and manipulate objects effectively, even those requiring delicate handling[9].
Additionally, advancements in brain-controlled prosthetics have been significant. These prosthetics often incorporate deep learning algorithms with sEMG (surface electromyography) sensors and tactile feedback systems, allowing users to control their artificial limbs through thought. Tactile sensors in these prosthetics play a crucial role in providing feedback to adjust grip strength and prevent accidental slippage of objects, thereby enhancing the ability to handle fragile items like eggs and thin glass safely.
4.2. Role of artificial intelligence in enhancing prosthetics
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been transformative in the field of prosthetics, particularly through the application of machine learning and deep learning techniques. These AI methods enable advanced pattern recognition and classification of biosignals, which significantly enhance the functionality of prosthetic devices[10].
For instance, various AI techniques have been utilized in the development of bionic hands, allowing these devices to adjust their grip and actions based on the feedback received from their environment, thus enabling more complex and varied tasks.
In another context, prosthetic hands equipped with AI capabilities demonstrate the potential to dynamically respond to different textures and surface conditions through sophisticated tactile feedback systems. This enhancement not only elevates the functional aspect of the prosthetics but also serves to bolster the self-assurance of the individuals utilizing them, facilitating a more effective execution of precision tasks.
4.3. Integration of tactile sensors in rehabilitation robotics
The integration of tactile sensors is critical in rehabilitation robotics, aiding in the recovery of motor functions and enhancing the tactile feedback for patients. The use of AI to interpret sensor data has led to improvements in real-time feedback mechanisms, which are crucial for patients regaining hand function and other motor skills[10]. For example, advanced tactile sensors in rehabilitation robotics can simulate the touch and movement sensations, improving patient engagement and effectiveness of the therapeutic sessions.
5. Conclusion
The integration of tactile sensors into prosthetic devices represents a significant leap forward in enhancing the functionality and user experience of these technologies. Tactile sensors, including piezoresistive, piezoelectric, capacitive, and multimodal types, have proven essential in replicating the complex sensory feedback that natural limbs provide. By converting mechanical stimuli into electrical signals, these sensors enable prosthetic users to interact with their environment more naturally and effectively, restoring a sense of touch that greatly improves quality of life.
Advancements in material science, including the utilization of nanomaterials, ionic gels, and hydrogels, have further augmented the sensitivity, malleability, and robustness of tactile sensors. These innovations have made it possible to develop highly responsive artificial skin that closely mimics the properties of human skin, providing users with real-time feedback on pressure, texture, and temperature. Additionally, the incorporation of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms has allowed prosthetics to adapt dynamically to user needs, further enhancing their performance.
Case studies demonstrate the real-world impact of these technologies, from brain-controlled prosthetic arms that allow users to manipulate fragile objects with precision to rehabilitation robots that aid in the recovery of motor functions through haptic feedback. These applications highlight the transformative potential of tactile sensors not only in prosthetics but also in broader fields such as robotics and biomedicine.
Nonetheless, several challenges persist, including the necessity for enhanced biocompatibility, prolonged durability, and seamless integration with the human neural architecture. Future research should focus on overcoming these barriers by exploring new materials and fabrication techniques, enhancing nerve interfacing methods, and further leveraging AI for more personalized and adaptive prosthetic devices.
In conclusion, tactile sensors are revolutionizing the field of prosthetics, bridging the gap between human and machine interaction. As research progresses, these sensors hold the promise of creating a new generation of intelligent prosthetic devices that offer amputees not only mobility but also a restored sense of touch, making daily tasks more intuitive and life more fulfilling.
Acknowledgment
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Dario Farina, Chair in Neurorehabilitation Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, for his invaluable guidance, support, and encouragement throughout this research. His expertise and insights have been instrumental in shaping the direction of this work, and his commitment to advancing the field of neurorehabilitation engineering has been an inspiration. I am deeply grateful for his mentorship and the opportunities he has provided, which have significantly enriched my academic journey.
References
[1]. Nassar, H., Khandelwal, G., Chirila, R., Karagiorgis, X., Ginesi, R. E., Dahiya, A. S., & Dahiya, R. (2023). Fully 3D printed piezoelectric pressure sensor for dynamic tactile sensing. Additive Manufacturing, 71, 103601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103601​:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
[2]. Scaffaro, R., Maio, A., & Citarrella, M. C. (2021). Ionic tactile sensors as promising biomaterials for artificial skin: Review of latest advances and future perspectives. European Polymer Journal, 151, 110421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110421​:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
[3]. Tan, Q., Wu, C., Li, L., Shao, W., & Luo, M. (2022). Nanomaterial-based prosthetic limbs for disability mobility assistance: A review of recent advances. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2022, 3425297. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3425297​:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
[4]. Li, Y., Yang, L., Deng, S., Huang, H., Wang, Y., Xiong, Z., Feng, S., Wang, S., Li, T., & Zhang, T. (2023). A machine learning-assisted multifunctional tactile sensor for smart prosthetics. InfoMat, 5(2023), e12463. https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12463​:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
[5]. Ham, J., Huh, T. M., Kim, J., Kim, J. O., Park, S., Cutkosky, M. R., & Bao, Z. (2022). Porous dielectric elastomer based flexible multiaxial tactile sensor for dexterous robotic or prosthetic hands. Advanced Materials Technologies, 8(2023), 2200903. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202200903​:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
[6]. Yildiz, K. A., Shin, A. Y., & Kaufman, K. R. (2020). Interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of a neuroprosthetic limb: A review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 17, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00667-5​:contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}
[7]. Luu, D. K., Nguyen, A. T., Jiang, M., Drealan, M. W., Xu, J., Wu, T., ... & Yang, Z. (2022). Artificial intelligence enables real-time and intuitive control of prostheses via nerve interface. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 69(10), 3051–3062. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2022.3160618​:contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}
[8]. Yang, R., Zhang, W., Tiwari, N., Yan, H., Li, T., & Cheng, H. (2022). Multimodal sensors with decoupled sensing mechanisms. Advanced Science, 9, 2202470. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202202470​:contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}
[9]. Schofield, J. S., Battraw, M. A., Parker, A. S. R., Pilarski, P. M., Sensinger, J. W., & Marasco, P. D. (2021). Embodied cooperation to promote forgiving interactions with autonomous machines. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 15, 661603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2021.661603​:contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}
[10]. Terrazas-Rodas, D., & Carrión-Pérez, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence techniques for biosignal pattern recognition and classification in upper-limb prostheses: A review. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence Systems (IoTaIS), 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1109/IoTaIS.2022.9799645​:contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}
Cite this article
Jiang,S. (2025). Technologies for Enhancing Tactile Perception in Prosthetic Devices. Theoretical and Natural Science,69,208-213.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Modern Medicine and Global Health
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Nassar, H., Khandelwal, G., Chirila, R., Karagiorgis, X., Ginesi, R. E., Dahiya, A. S., & Dahiya, R. (2023). Fully 3D printed piezoelectric pressure sensor for dynamic tactile sensing. Additive Manufacturing, 71, 103601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103601​:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
[2]. Scaffaro, R., Maio, A., & Citarrella, M. C. (2021). Ionic tactile sensors as promising biomaterials for artificial skin: Review of latest advances and future perspectives. European Polymer Journal, 151, 110421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110421​:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
[3]. Tan, Q., Wu, C., Li, L., Shao, W., & Luo, M. (2022). Nanomaterial-based prosthetic limbs for disability mobility assistance: A review of recent advances. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2022, 3425297. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3425297​:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
[4]. Li, Y., Yang, L., Deng, S., Huang, H., Wang, Y., Xiong, Z., Feng, S., Wang, S., Li, T., & Zhang, T. (2023). A machine learning-assisted multifunctional tactile sensor for smart prosthetics. InfoMat, 5(2023), e12463. https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12463​:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
[5]. Ham, J., Huh, T. M., Kim, J., Kim, J. O., Park, S., Cutkosky, M. R., & Bao, Z. (2022). Porous dielectric elastomer based flexible multiaxial tactile sensor for dexterous robotic or prosthetic hands. Advanced Materials Technologies, 8(2023), 2200903. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202200903​:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
[6]. Yildiz, K. A., Shin, A. Y., & Kaufman, K. R. (2020). Interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of a neuroprosthetic limb: A review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 17, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00667-5​:contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}
[7]. Luu, D. K., Nguyen, A. T., Jiang, M., Drealan, M. W., Xu, J., Wu, T., ... & Yang, Z. (2022). Artificial intelligence enables real-time and intuitive control of prostheses via nerve interface. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 69(10), 3051–3062. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2022.3160618​:contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}
[8]. Yang, R., Zhang, W., Tiwari, N., Yan, H., Li, T., & Cheng, H. (2022). Multimodal sensors with decoupled sensing mechanisms. Advanced Science, 9, 2202470. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202202470​:contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}
[9]. Schofield, J. S., Battraw, M. A., Parker, A. S. R., Pilarski, P. M., Sensinger, J. W., & Marasco, P. D. (2021). Embodied cooperation to promote forgiving interactions with autonomous machines. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 15, 661603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2021.661603​:contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}
[10]. Terrazas-Rodas, D., & Carrión-Pérez, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence techniques for biosignal pattern recognition and classification in upper-limb prostheses: A review. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence Systems (IoTaIS), 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1109/IoTaIS.2022.9799645​:contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}