1. Introduction
Epigenetics refers to heritable changes in gene function that occur without alteration of the underlying DNA sequence. These include a range of mechanisms, most notably DNA methylation, histone modifications, and noncoding RNA interactions, which can sharply turn genes on and off and, in so doing, significantly influence how a particular phenotype is expressed until relatively recently. These changes were considered peripheral to core genetic research; however, it has become increasingly apparent that epigenetic processes are necessary. An interface between genetic predispositions and environmental influences, it thus offers profound insights into disease development, progression, and prevention [1].
In the past twenty years, epigenetics has come from relative obscurity to a central discipline in life sciences and biomedicine. While early research focused on how DNA methylation might influence oncogene and tumor suppressor gene expression in cancer, subsequent investigations broadened to include a wide range of areas, including developmental biology, neuroscience, endocrinology, and population health. They found that cells with the exact same DNA sequence had highly variable phenotypes based on which genes happened to be epigenetically turned off or on. This provides a mechanism to describe cellular differentiation, wherein embryonic stem cells undergo a series of steps eventually determining which tissue types they all become, and an explanation for some surprising observances, such as why monozygotic twins, who are genetically identical, may have different fates with respect to disease outcome [2].
Concurrently, evidence has mounted to support the hypothesis that environmental factors—ranging from diet and physical activity to psychological stress, toxic exposures, and social determinants of health—can alter the epigenetic marks that govern gene expression [3]. Intriguingly, some of these changes have been noted to persist across multiple generations, suggesting that epigenetics may be a powerful driver of transgenerational inheritance, thereby reshaping traditional views on how traits and disease susceptibilities pass from parent to offspring.
Given the rapid accumulation of findings, it is increasingly clear that epigenetics influences a vast array of biological processes. The deeper our comprehension of these mechanisms, the more we stand to unlock targeted interventions for preventing or managing chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and certain neuropsychiatric disorders like depression or schizophrenia.
Through a literature review, this paper explores the regulation of gene expression by core epigenetic mechanisms, the influence of environmental factors on epigenetic processes and disease risk, and the translation of epigenetic insights into clinical applications for disease prevention and therapy.
Epigenetics stands at the crossroads of genetic information and environmental influence, playing an indispensable role in shaping phenotypic outcomes and informing disease pathogenesis. Understanding how epigenetic mechanisms operate—and how they can be manipulated—holds transformative potential for medical research, public health, and clinical interventions.
2. Mechanisms of Epigenetic Regulation
Epigenetic regulation can be broadly understood through three main processes: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and noncoding RNA. Each mechanism operates via covalent or noncovalent changes to the chromatin structure or gene regulatory networks. While distinct, these processes are interconnected in complex ways, often forming a regulatory “code” that dynamically shapes gene expression.
2.1. DNA Methylation
DNA methylation is the addition of a methyl group (CH3) to the fifth carbon of the cytosine ring, typically within cytosine-guanine (CpG) dinucleotides. These CpG sites are often clustered in CpG islands near gene promoters, and their methylation state can determine whether a gene is transcriptionally active or inactive [4]. In general, hypermethylation of promoter regions is associated with gene silencing due to reduced accessibility for transcription factors, whereas hypomethylation can lead to gene activation and, in pathological contexts such as cancer, may contribute to genomic instability.
The enzymes responsible for catalyzing methylation are DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). DNMT1 is often referred to as the “maintenance methyltransferase,” responsible for copying methylation patterns during DNA replication, while DNMT3A and DNMT3B initiate new methylation (de novo methylation). DNA methylation serves critical roles in genomic imprinting, X-chromosome inactivation, and suppression of repetitive elements [5].
2.2. Histone Modifications
Eukaryotic DNA is wrapped around histone proteins (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) to form nucleosomes, the fundamental units of chromatin. The amino-terminal “tails” of histones are subject to various post-translational modifications (PTMs), which play critical roles in regulating chromatin structure and gene expression. For example, acetylation, mediated by histone acetyltransferases, is generally associated with euchromatin - an open chromatin conformation that allows higher gene expression - whereas deacetylation, mediated by histone deacetylases, is usually associated with heterochromatin, a more compacted structure of chromatin related to the repression of genes. Methylation, mediated by histone methyltransferases, can act either as an activating or repressing mark, depending on the target lysine or arginine. For instance, methylation of H3K4 normally accompanies active transcription, while H3K27 methylation is associated with the repression of transcription.
These modifications serve as binding platforms for further chromatin-remodeling complexes. For instance, proteins containing bromodomains recognize acetylated histones, while chromodomains bind methylated histones. Thus, the interplay of different histone marks can recruit distinct sets of co-activators or co-repressors, fine-tuning gene expression in a spatiotemporally regulated manner [6].
2.3. Noncoding RNA
Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), despite not encoding proteins, play significant regulatory roles in the epigenome and can be broadly categorized into microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). MicroRNAs are short RNA molecules, typically about 22 nucleotides in length, that bind to complementary sequences on mRNA molecules, leading to mRNA degradation or inhibition of translation. Through this mechanism, miRNAs indirectly influence epigenetic states by regulating the expression of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), histone-modifying enzymes, or transcription factors. Long noncoding RNAs, in contrast, are generally over 200 nucleotides long and have diverse functions, including binding histone-modifying complexes such as the polycomb repressive complex 2 and directing them to specific genomic loci to induce localized chromatin changes. Some lncRNAs act as decoys by “sponging” transcription factors or miRNAs, while others serve as scaffolds to bring into large regulatory complexes [7].
These three epigenetic mechanisms- DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA-associated gene silencing-together form an intertwined network that often responds tightly to a variety of cellular signals and environmental cues. These epigenetic modifications are everything but background noise in determining the functional outcome of the genome.
3. Environmental Influences on Epigenetics
Perhaps the most interesting feature of epigenetics is its plasticity; the epigenome can be reprogrammed by a wide array of environmental signals. While the DNA sequence may be relatively fixed in any individual, epigenetic states are considerably more fluid and modifiable by diet, toxins, stress, physical activity, and even social interactions. The basis of understanding such influences that shape epigenetic regulation is at the center of deciphering disease etiology and developing prevention strategies.
3.1. Diet and Nutrition
Diet provides substrates and cofactors that participate directly in epigenetic processes. For example, folate, vitamin B12, and methionine are part of one-carbon metabolism, which produces S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), the universal methyl donor for DNA and histone methylation [8]. Disruptions in this pathway—due to malnutrition, overnutrition, or imbalanced micronutrient intake—can lead to abnormal DNA methylation patterns.
In the Dutch Hunger Winter of 1944–1945, pregnant women who suffered severe famine had children who expressed marked epigenetic differences in genes central to metabolic control [9]. Years later, these individuals had higher incidences of obesity, cardiovascular disease, and other metabolic disorders. These observations give reason to highlight the idea that nutritional stressors during sensitive developmental windows can "program" the epigenome of an individual in ways that can persist throughout life and sometimes be passed to subsequent generations.
Other dietary factors also importantly affect epigenetics through various mechanisms. For example, it was demonstrated that polyphenols, widely distributed in fruits, vegetables, and tea, inhibit the activity of certain histone-modifying enzymes and, in this way, modulate gene expression. Further, the alteration in the expression of adipokines associated with obesity can be a consequence of epigenetic changes in adipose tissue - a very straightforward example of the interaction between metabolic health and the epigenome. Moreover, high-fat or high-sugar diets can promote the establishment of epigenetic marks that drive inflammation and insulin resistance, again illustrating how great an impact nutritional input has on epigenetic regulation and overall health.
3.2. Stress and Psychosocial Factors
Recently, psychosocial stress has been increasingly recognized as a potent modulator of the epigenome. Animal studies have shown that maternal behaviors induce changes in glucocorticoid receptor gene methylation, which influences an offspring's stress reactivity and risk for anxiety or depression [10]. In humans, chronic stress has been associated with methylation changes in genes controlling the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, immune function, and neurotransmitter pathways. These epigenetic changes may influence the development of mood disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other psychiatric conditions.
The social environment, like socioeconomic status, educational opportunities, and exposure to violence, can also shape epigenetic marks. For example, low socioeconomic status has been associated with differential methylation in immune-related genes and might explain health disparities across different populations. This direction of research, sometimes called social epigenetics, suggests a way through which social determinants become biologically embedded via alterations in chromatin structure and gene regulation.
3.3. Toxic Exposures and Pollutants
It includes heavy metal exposure from industrialization and modern lifestyles, such as lead, arsenic, pesticides, and endocrine disruptors such as bisphenol A, as well as air pollutants and particulate matter, amongst many others. Exposure to these toxic agents is quite variable, but several might either directly damage DNA or interfere with the normal epigenetic process. There are associations where abnormal DNA methylation has occurred, affecting genes controlling the expression and regulation during critical phases in neurodevelopment resulting from the toxicity of lead poisoning, potentially acting to predispose neurodevelopment deficiency [11]. Arsenic exposure has been associated with changes in histone modification patterns leading to gene dysregulation in critical pathways.
Besides, specific toxicants may express themselves as endocrine disruptors through the binding of hormone receptors or modifications in hormone metabolism. This, in turn, can have an epigenetic consequence for reproductive tissues with influences on fertility and cancer. Possibly of most concern, increased sensitivity within the developing embryo and young child creates a call to action for interventions and policies to minimize exposure to harmful substances, particularly during critical windows of development.
3.4. Critical Developmental Windows
Several lines of evidence suggest that early life, including prenatal and early postnatal periods, are specifically critical in setting the epigenetic pattern for life. In these periods, the epigenome undergoes extensive "programming" influenced by both internal (e.g., hormones, maternal physiology) and external (e.g., diet, stressors) cues. Other than the example of the Dutch Hunger Winter, epidemiological studies have demonstrated that maternal smoking, alcohol use, and even pollution exposure can lead to specific methylation patterns that are detectable in newborns.
The second period in that respect is adolescence, a year of significant epigenetic plasticity, namely, the season when critical changes take place concerning hormonal and neural development. In this respect, epigenetic modifications have the potential to provide susceptibility for an individual to mental disorders, substance abuse, and also other behavioral abnormalities. The known "windows of vulnerability" themselves will instruct policies toward strategies aimed at minimizing these epigenetic damages when such damages are more likely to consolidate and be passed over even transgenerationally [12].
4. Clinical Applications and Future Directions
A major impetus driving epigenetics research is the promise of clinical translation. By identifying how epigenetic patterns correlate with—or even predict—disease risk, scientists and clinicians hope to develop novel diagnostic tools and therapeutic interventions. While many of these applications remain in development, they point toward a future where epigenetics plays a central role in precision medicine.
4.1. Disease Prevention and Risk Assessment
4.1.1. Biomarkers for Early Detection
One of the most promising applications is the identification of epigenetic biomarkers—particularly DNA methylation signatures—that correlate with disease onset and progression [13]. For instance, hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes can serve as a warning signal for early-stage cancers. Similarly, distinct patterns of histone modifications may flag underlying inflammation or metabolic disturbances long before clinical symptoms manifest.
Detecting these changes in circulating free DNA or in easily accessible tissues (e.g., blood, saliva) could lead to non-invasive tests that offer earlier and more accurate diagnoses. This possibility is particularly appealing for diseases such as lung cancer, where current screening methods are either invasive or prone to high false-positive rates.
4.1.2. Personalized Lifestyle Interventions
Epigenetic profiles could eventually be used to individualize lifestyle recommendations for disease prevention. For example, individuals showing epigenetic markers linked to insulin resistance could receive dietary counseling emphasizing nutrient balance and glycemic control, potentially preventing or delaying the onset of type 2 diabetes. The same principle applies to stress reduction programs—if someone’s epigenetic profile reveals heightened sensitivity to stress, they may benefit disproportionately from interventions like mindfulness-based stress reduction, therapy, or support groups.
4.2. Epigenetic Therapies
4.2.1. Drugs Targeting Epigenetic Enzymes
The use of epigenetically active pharmaceuticals has already gained traction in oncology. DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors, such as azacitidine and decitabine, can demethylate hypermethylated tumor suppressor genes, reactivating them to curb cancer proliferation. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, including vorinostat and romidepsin, have shown efficacy in treating certain lymphomas by reinstating a more open chromatin conformation, enabling the re-expression of growth-regulating genes [14].
Emerging research suggests that combinatorial treatments—using DNMT and HDAC inhibitors in tandem, or pairing them with traditional chemotherapy—may yield synergistic benefits. Moreover, efforts are underway to develop next-generation compounds that target additional epigenetic modifiers, such as histone methyltransferases or bromodomain-containing proteins.
4.2.2. CRISPR-Based Epigenome Editing
The revolutionary CRISPR-Cas9 system has been adapted for epigenetic modulation—often referred to as CRISPR epigenome editing. Instead of cleaving the DNA, researchers can fuse catalytically “dead” Cas9 (dCas9) to enzymes that add or remove epigenetic marks at specific loci [15]. For example, targeting a dCas9-DNMT fusion protein to a gene promoter can locally methylate cytosines, silencing a disease-related gene. Conversely, a dCas9-TET fusion could demethylate CpG sites, potentially reactivating a beneficial gene. This approach offers high specificity and programmability, presenting a promising avenue for diseases that have well-characterized epigenetic underpinnings, such as Fragile X syndrome or certain types of cancer.
While still in the experimental phase, these technologies hint at a future where precise epigenetic modifications can correct aberrant gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence. This could circumvent some of the ethical and technical concerns around heritable genome editing.
4.3. Ethical and Practical Considerations
There are several ethical and logistical concerns related to translating basic epigenetics research into broad clinical applications. In some cases, epigenetic changes can be passed down through generations, and the treatments that act on the epigenome can unintentionally affect more than one generation. Epigenetic drugs often modify the activity of more than one gene at one time, adding to the potential for off-target effects. Advanced therapeutics, including those based on CRISPR, are usually too expensive, and such a trend may point to a darker future where existing health inequities could be made worse, leaving the resource-poor further behind as epigenetic innovations march ahead. There are also concerns regarding privacy and genetic discrimination, since epigenetic profiles could be used by employers or insurance companies in efforts to evaluate health risks, with possible consequences of privacy violations or discriminatory practices. This underlines the fact that only updated legal frameworks, such as expanding Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Acts regarding epigenetic data, are needed. From the last perspective, in relation to the application of epigenetic editing in the clinic, there is a need for inclusive guidelines that, in fact, require coordination between all scientists, clinicians, bioethicists, and policy planners; from the point of view of regulatory authorities at the FDA or EMA level, there would be a requirement to revisit rules and regulations in view of specifics surrounding epigenetics-based interventions with respect to their employment, safely and soundly.
5. Conclusion
Epigenetics has transformed how the interplay of genes and environment contributes to health and disease. The study of DNA methylation, histone modifications, and noncoding RNA core mechanisms puts into perspective the epigenome as a dynamic interface that effectively translates external input into stable or reversible gene expression changes. Various environmental exposures, including nutritional factors, psychosocial stressors, and chemical toxicants, have the potential to induce epigenetic changes with both immediate and possibly transgenerational effects on disease risk.
With notable improvement, there have remained a few more identifiable challenges: this includes incomplete comprehension of long-term epigenetic therapeutic effects and maybe certain off-target effects. There has been a further need for explication of the minutest detail with regard to epigenetic regulation so far as making the therapies truly usable is concerned. In view of fairness, the focus in the proximal future will fall on working out suitable, harmless editing technology coupled with an advance of our epigenetics knowledge and easy availability of its applications in treatments. Addressing these gaps will finally allow epigenetic research to achieve its potential to revolutionize disease prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.
References
[1]. Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007;447(7143):396-8.
[2]. Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nature genetics. 2003;33 Suppl(3s):245-54.
[3]. Feil R, Fraga MF. Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nature reviews Genetics. 2012;13(2):97-109.
[4]. Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nature reviews Genetics. 2012;13(7):484-92.
[5]. Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Early nutrition, epigenetic changes at transposons and imprinted genes, and enhanced susceptibility to adult chronic diseases. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif). 2004; 20(1): 63-8.
[6]. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell research. 2011; 21(3): 381-95.
[7]. Mattick JS, Mercer TR, Dinger ME. Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nature reviews Genetics. 2009; 10(3): 155-9.
[8]. Lillycrop KA, Burdge GC. The Effect of Nutrition during Early Life on the Epigenetic Regulation of Transcription and Implications for Human Diseases. Journal of nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics. 2011; 4(5): 248-60.
[9]. Heijmans BT, Tobi EW, Stein AD, Putter H, Blauw GJ, Susser ES, et al. Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS. 2008; 105(44): 17046-9.
[10]. Szyf M, Meaney MJ, Weaver ICG, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D'Alessio AC, et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature neuroscience. 2004; 7(8): 847-54.
[11]. Bollati V, Baccarelli A. Environmental epigenetics. Heredity. 2010; 105(1): 105-12.
[12]. Skinner MK. Environmental Epigenetics and a Unified Theory of the Molecular Aspects of Evolution: A Neo-Lamarckian Concept that Facilitates Neo-Darwinian Evolution. Genome biology and evolution. 2015; 7(5): 1296-302.
[13]. Laird PW. Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Nature reviews Genetics. 2010; 11(3): 191-203.
[14]. Yoo CB, Jones PA. Epigenetic therapy of cancer: past, present and future. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2006; 5(2): 1.
[15]. Hilton IB, D'Ippolito AM, Vockley CM, Thakore PI, Crawford GE, Reddy TE, et al. Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nature biotechnology. 2015; 33(5): 510-7.
Cite this article
Ao,Y. (2025). The Influence of Epigenetics on Gene Expression: Mechanisms, Environmental Interactions and Clinical Applications in Disease Prevention and Treatment. Theoretical and Natural Science,81,66-72.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental Geoscience and Earth Ecology
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007;447(7143):396-8.
[2]. Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nature genetics. 2003;33 Suppl(3s):245-54.
[3]. Feil R, Fraga MF. Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nature reviews Genetics. 2012;13(2):97-109.
[4]. Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nature reviews Genetics. 2012;13(7):484-92.
[5]. Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Early nutrition, epigenetic changes at transposons and imprinted genes, and enhanced susceptibility to adult chronic diseases. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif). 2004; 20(1): 63-8.
[6]. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell research. 2011; 21(3): 381-95.
[7]. Mattick JS, Mercer TR, Dinger ME. Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nature reviews Genetics. 2009; 10(3): 155-9.
[8]. Lillycrop KA, Burdge GC. The Effect of Nutrition during Early Life on the Epigenetic Regulation of Transcription and Implications for Human Diseases. Journal of nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics. 2011; 4(5): 248-60.
[9]. Heijmans BT, Tobi EW, Stein AD, Putter H, Blauw GJ, Susser ES, et al. Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS. 2008; 105(44): 17046-9.
[10]. Szyf M, Meaney MJ, Weaver ICG, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D'Alessio AC, et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature neuroscience. 2004; 7(8): 847-54.
[11]. Bollati V, Baccarelli A. Environmental epigenetics. Heredity. 2010; 105(1): 105-12.
[12]. Skinner MK. Environmental Epigenetics and a Unified Theory of the Molecular Aspects of Evolution: A Neo-Lamarckian Concept that Facilitates Neo-Darwinian Evolution. Genome biology and evolution. 2015; 7(5): 1296-302.
[13]. Laird PW. Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Nature reviews Genetics. 2010; 11(3): 191-203.
[14]. Yoo CB, Jones PA. Epigenetic therapy of cancer: past, present and future. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2006; 5(2): 1.
[15]. Hilton IB, D'Ippolito AM, Vockley CM, Thakore PI, Crawford GE, Reddy TE, et al. Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nature biotechnology. 2015; 33(5): 510-7.