Research Article
Open access
Published on 17 November 2023
Download pdf
Feng,Y. (2023). A numerical study on the optimization of an airfoil design. Theoretical and Natural Science,11,199-206.
Export citation

A numerical study on the optimization of an airfoil design

Yiding Feng *,1,
  • 1 The University of Adelaide

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/11/20230408

Abstract

How to optimize the design of an airfoil to achieve excellent aerodynamic performance has always been a popular research topic, because the wing is the main source of the lift of an airplane. Improving the lift-to-drag ratio (L/D ratio) is often taken as the aim for airfoil design optimization. In the optimization process, it is required to optimize one of the shape parameters of the airfoil under the premise of keeping the rest of the shape parameters consistent till the optimal L/D ratio is reached. This paper studies how the camber affects the L/D ratio of an airfoil using the CFD method and optimizes the airfoil design based on the camber. Three airfoils with different camber were simulated in 2D using the software COMSOL. The graphs of the L/D ratio at different angles of attack (AOA) for these three airfoils were plotted, and the results reveal that the airfoil with the highest camber has the optimal L/D ratio. Therefore, high camber is a good choice to improve the L/D ratio of an airfoil in airfoil design.

Keywords

airfoil; computational fluid dynamics; optimization; lift-to-drag ratio.

[1]. Gudmundsson, S 2014, ‘Performance-Cruise’, General aviation aircraft design: applied method and procedures, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 847-894.

[2]. Young, T & Hirst, M 2012, ‘Revolutionary ideas about the future of air transport’, Innovation on Aeronautics, Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp. 233-259.

[3]. Acarer, S 2020, ‘Peak lift-to-drag ratio enhancement of the DU12W262 airfoil by passive flow control and its impact on the horizontal and vertical axis wind turbines’, Energy, vol. 201, p. 117659.

[4]. Sogukpinar, H & Bozkurt, I 2015, ‘Calculation of Optimum Angle of Attack to Determine Maximum Lift to Drag Ratio of NACA 632-215 Airfoil’, Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1103-1208.

[5]. Hong, Z, Yu, T, Chen, G, Li, X & Hong, Y 2019, ‘Simulation Analysis on the Blade Airfoil of Small Wind Turbine’, Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 295 (2), p. 12079.

[6]. Haryanto, I, Utomo, M, Sinaga, N, Rosalia, C & Putra, A 2014, ‘Optimization of Maximum Lift To Drag Ratio On Airfoil Design Based On Artificial Neural Network Utilizing Genetic Algorithm’, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 493, pp. 123-128.

[7]. Zhang, J, Guo, W, Zhang, P & J, H 2023, ‘Optimizing Airfoil Aerodynamic Characteristics by Using Proposed CSA-KJ Method’, Applied Sciences, vol. 13(2), p. 924.

[8]. He, Y, Agarwal, RK & Ganguli, R 2014, ‘Shape Optimization of NREL S809 Airfoil for Wind Turbine Blades Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm’, International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2014, p.1-13.

[9]. Houghton, EL, Carpenter, PW, Collicott, ST & Valentine, DT 2017, Aerodynamics for Engineering Students (Seventh Edition), 7th edn, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

[10]. Tulus, Khairani, C, Marpaung, TJ & Suriati 2019, ‘Computational Analysis of Fluid Behaviour Around Airfoil with Navier-Stokes Equation’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1376 (1), p.12003.

[11]. Cadence, 2023, The Importance of Meshing in CFD and Structural FEA, Cadence, viewed 20 April 2023, <https://resources.system-analysis.cadence.com/blog/msa2022-the-importance-of-meshing-in-cfd-and-structural-fea>.

[12]. Jacobs, E, Ward, K & Pinkerton, R 1933, The characteristics of 78 related airfoil sections from tests in the variable-density wind tunnel, the U.S. Federal Government, Washington.

Cite this article

Feng,Y. (2023). A numerical study on the optimization of an airfoil design. Theoretical and Natural Science,11,199-206.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Mathematical Physics and Computational Simulation

Conference website: https://www.confmpcs.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-133-9(Print) / 978-1-83558-134-6(Online)
Conference date: 12 August 2023
Editor:Roman Bauer
Series: Theoretical and Natural Science
Volume number: Vol.11
ISSN:2753-8818(Print) / 2753-8826(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).