
The impact of mutations in key genes on the pathogenesis of esophageal cancer
- 1 Sichuan University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer (EC) ranks seventh among all cancers in terms of frequency and is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The 5-year relative survival rate for esophageal cancer stands at a dismal 21%, which is nearly the lowest among all cancers. In China alone, over 477,900 individuals are diagnosed with EC annually. Advances in whole-genome sequencing technologies have enabled researchers to identify numerous gene mutations across the entire gene sequence in EC patients. This paper aims to consolidate current knowledge on several key genes implicated in EC, as revealed by whole-genome sequencing of patient biopsies. By examining research papers published within the last decade, this study captures the main findings and elucidates the influence of mutations in SOX2, TP53, NOTCH1, SMAD4, and CDKN2A on the formation, progression, and prognosis of both esophageal adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas. The insights gained are expected to contribute positively to the overall comprehension of esophageal cancer.
Keywords
esophagus cancer, SOX2, TP53, NOTCH1, SMAD4, CDKN2A
[1]. Novak D, Hüser L, Elton J J, et al. SOX2 in development and cancer biology[C]. Seminars in cancer biology, 2020: 74-82.
[2]. Wu Z, Zhou J, Zhang X, et al. Reprogramming of the esophageal squamous carcinoma epigenome by SOX2 promotes ADAR1 dependence[J]. Nature Genetics, 2021, 53(6): 881-894.
[3]. Zhan Y, Li R, Feng C, et al. Chlorogenic acid inhibits esophageal squamous cell carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo by downregulating the expression of BMI1 and SOX2[J]. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2020, 121.
[4]. Calderon-Aparicio A, Yamamoto H, De Vitto H, et al. RCC2 Promotes Esophageal Cancer Growth by Regulating Activity and Expression of the Sox2 Transcription Factor[J]. Mol Cancer Res, 2020, 18(11): 1660-1674.
[5]. Haghi B, Saghaeian Jazi M, Khosravi A, et al. SOX2OT lncRNA Inhibition Suppresses the Stemness Characteristics of Esophageal Tumorspheres[J]. Non-coding RNA, 2022, 8(6): 80.
[6]. Hishida T, Vazquez-Ferrer E, Hishida-Nozaki Y, et al. Mutations in foregut SOX2+ cells induce efficient proliferation via CXCR2 pathway[J]. Protein & cell, 2019, 10(7): 485-495.
[7]. Wang Z, Strasser A, Kelly G L. Should mutant TP53 be targeted for cancer therapy?[J]. Cell Death & Differentiation, 2022, 29(5): 911-920.
[8]. Redston M, Noffsinger A, Kim A, et al. Abnormal TP53 predicts risk of progression in patients with Barrett’s esophagus regardless of a diagnosis of dysplasia[J]. Gastroenterology, 2022, 162(2): 468-481.
[9]. Murai K, Dentro S, Ong S H, et al. p53 mutation in normal esophagus promotes multiple stages of carcinogenesis but is constrained by clonal competition[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 6206.
[10]. Sihag S, Nussenzweig S C, Walch H S, et al. The Role of the TP53 Pathway in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma[J]. Clinical Cancer Research, 2022, 28(12): 2669-2678.
[11]. Jin Y, Zhao X, Song X, et al. The High Expression of p53 Is Predictive of Poor Survival Rather TP53 Mutation in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma[J]. Journal of Oncology, 2023, 2023.
[12]. Gharaibeh L, Elmadany N, Alwosaibai K, et al. Notch1 in cancer therapy: possible clinical implications and challenges[J]. Molecular pharmacology, 2020, 98(5): 559-576.
[13]. Wu H, Yu Z, Liu Y, et al. Genomic characterization reveals distinct mutation landscapes and therapeutic implications in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract[J]. Cancer Communications, 2022, 42(12): 1367-1386.
[14]. Abby E, Dentro S C, Hall M W, et al. Notch1 mutations drive clonal expansion in normal esophageal epithelium but impair tumor growth[J]. Nature Genetics, 2023, 55(2): 232-245.
[15]. Liu M, Liu Y, Zhou R, et al. Absence of NOTCH1 mutation and presence of CDKN2A deletion predict progression of esophageal lesions[J]. The Journal of Pathology, 2022, 258(1): 38-48.
[16]. Song Z, Liu Y, Cheng G, et al. Distinct mutational backgrounds and clonal architectures implicated prognostic discrepancies in small-cell carcinomas of the esophagus and lung[J]. Cell Death & Disease, 2021, 12(5): 472.
[17]. Liang J, Wang Y, Cai L, et al. Comparative genomic analysis reveals genetic variations in multiple primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma of chinese population[J]. Frontiers in Oncology, 2022, 12: 868301.
[18]. Vega M E, Giroux V, Natsuizaka M, et al. Inhibition of Notch signaling enhances transdifferentiation of the esophageal squamous epithelium towards a Barrett’s-like metaplasia via KLF4[J]. Cell Cycle, 2014, 13(24): 3857-3866.
[19]. Natsugoe S, Xiangming C, Matsumoto M, et al. Smad4 and transforming growth factor β1 expression in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus[J]. Clinical cancer research, 2002, 8(6): 1838-1842.
[20]. Fukuchi M, Masuda N, Miyazaki T, et al. Decreased Smad4 expression in the transforming growth factor‐β signaling pathway during progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, 2002, 95(4): 737-743.
[21]. Teng Y, Sun A-N, Pan X-C, et al. Synergistic function of Smad4 and PTEN in suppressing forestomach squamous cell carcinoma in the mouse[J]. Cancer research, 2006, 66(14): 6972-6981.
[22]. Xu X, Zheng L, Hang N, et al. The transcription factor c-Jun regulates Smad4 expression by upregulating pre-miR-183 expression to promote invasion and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas[J]. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Animal, 2020, 56: 550-558.
[23]. Hu N, Wang C, Su H, et al. High frequency of CDKN2A alterations in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from a high‐risk Chinese population[J]. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 2004, 39(3): 205-216.
[24]. Müller L B, Meurer L, Lopes A B, et al. Stepwise expression of CDKN2A and RB1 proteins in esophageal mucosa from patients at high risk for squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, 2014, 22(9): 669-673.
[25]. Ghobadi N, Mehramiz M, Shahidsales S, et al. A genetic variant in CDKN2A/2B locus was associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 2019, 234(4): 5070-5076.
[26]. Gao L, Guo R-Y, Lu H, et al. Clinical and Genomic Analysis of Patients with Short Survival after Surgery for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma[J]. Digestive Diseases, 2023, 41(3): 353-361.
Cite this article
Shi,X. (2024). The impact of mutations in key genes on the pathogenesis of esophageal cancer. Theoretical and Natural Science,40,209-215.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Biological Engineering and Medical Science
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).