Download pdf
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Psychodynamic and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression
- 1 University of Rochester
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Depression has emerged as a major global mental health issue, impacting the quality of life for millions. With its rising prevalence, it is crucial to investigate effective treatments and understand the mechanisms behind various therapies to provide patients with more targeted support. The paper aims to compare the effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in the treatment of depression. Through the review of the relevant literature, this paper evaluates the effectiveness of these two therapies in three dimensions: short-term effects, durability of treatment outcomes, and subjective patient experience. Both psychodynamic therapy and CBT demonstrate significant positive effects following treatment. In particular, psychodynamic therapy worked by changing deep cognitive structures associated with depression, while CBT worked by breaking the cycle of depressed mood and reducing negative feelings about depression itself. However, the effects of both therapies are weak in terms of long-term sustainability. Therefore, to attain more enduring therapeutic outcomes, it is advisable to formulate personalized treatment plans tailored to individual patient differences, aiming to enhance the efficacy of treatment and the quality of life for those with depression.
Keywords
Depression, Psychodynamic Therapies, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies, Short-term Psychotherapies
[1]. Leichsenring, F. and Schauenbury, H. (2014) Empirically supported methods of short-term psychodynamic therapy in depression – Towards an evidence-based unified protocol. Journal of Affective Disorders, 169: 128-143.
[2]. Freud, S. (1917) Mourning and Melancholia. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIV (1914-1916): On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement, Papers on Metapsychology and Other Works, 237-258.
[3]. Brewin, C.R. (1996) Theoretical foundations of cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression. Annual Review of Psychology, 47: 33-57.
[4]. Teasdale, J.D. (1985) Psychological treatments for depression: How do they work? Behavioral Research and Therapy, 23(2):157-165.
[5]. Churchill, R., et al. (2010). Psychodynamic therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD008706.
[6]. Messer, S.B. and Warren, C.S. (1995) Models of Brief Psychodynamic Therapy. New York: Guilford, 1995:169.
[7]. Mann, J. (1973) Time‐limited Psychotherapy. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
[8]. Golden, B.R. and Robbins, S.B. (1990) The working alliance within time-limited therapy: A case analysis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21(6): 476-481.
[9]. Driessen, E., et al. (2010) The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(1): 5-36.
[10]. Løvgren, A., et al. (2020) Improvement in psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: A 1ualitative study of the patients’ perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17: 6843.
[11]. Lepping, P., et al. (2017) Clinical relevance of findings in trials of CBT for depression. European Psychiatry, 45: 207-211.
[12]. Angelakis, I., et al. (2022) Effectiveness of cognitive–behavioural therapies of varying complexity in reducing depression in adults: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 221(2): 459-467.
[13]. Kovacs, M. and Beck, A.T. (1978) Maladaptive cognitive structures in depression. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 135(5), 525-533.
[14]. Klein, T., et al. (2024) Dose-response relationship in cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: A nonlinear metaregression analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 92(5), 296-309.
[15]. López-López, J.A., et al. (2019) The process and delivery of CBT for depression in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 49(12): 1937-1947.
Cite this article
Yan,C. (2024). A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Psychodynamic and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression. Theoretical and Natural Science,70,68-72.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Biological Engineering and Medical Science
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).