1. Introduction
Pain perception is a complex process that involves the subjective experience of pain. It plays a crucial role in alerting individuals to potential harm and facilitating appropriate responses to protect the body. Understanding the factors that influence pain perception is essential for developing effective interventions to manage pain and improve the overall well-being of individuals. This literature review aims to explore the development of pain perception and the various factors that contribute to its variation across different populations.
The background and importance of pain perception lay in its significant impact on individuals' physical and emotional well-being. Pain perception helps individuals avoid potential dangers, seek necessary medical interventions, and adapt their daily activities to prevent further harm. However, the subjective nature of pain perception makes it a complex phenomenon to study and understand. By exploring the factors influencing pain perception, we can gain insights into why individuals may experience pain differently and how to develop tailored interventions for pain management.
2. The effect of attention on pain
Psychological researchers have focused on the factors that may influence pain feeling from the aspect of attention. Many earlier studies have shown that when people focus on the experience of intense pain, there sensitivity of pain tend to increase. On the other hand, distraction from pain can sometimes be useful to reduce the feeling pain. Subsequent research has found that distraction can reduce pain under certain conditions of complex and attention-demanding tasks that are valid to distracts individuals from moderating the feeling of pain.
Researchers have proposed a number of possible mechanisms by which attention may affect pain. The model of limited capability suggests that when sensory signals exceed plus work ability, attention will be selectively directed to the target. If an individual's attention is diverted away from the pain, preventing the individual from further developing the pain processing, can result in pain reduction [1].
Painful stimuli typically exist in motivational environments. Individuals who receive painful stimuli pursued by one or more goals. Motivation can influence the direction and intensity of attention, and therefore, motivation is an important factor in the relationship between pain and attention. So motivation and targets can be introduced into the study of pain to explain the inter individual experience of pain differences, and why do individuals’ performance differ in multiple environments, if target moderates the relationship between attention and pain. When an individual experiences pain, such as in an experiment where people are asked to perceive the degree of pain and rate it, participants focus their attention on pain - pain is always hurtful and hinders people from focusing on other tasks. This influence also occurs when participants are asked to control and eliminate pain. Well, when the target is not related to pain, it also attracts attention, usually occurring during pain. In threatening situations, the stronger the pain, the more attention it receives. The value allocation of goals, such as how interesting and important they are, whether they are enjoyable, can also affect the allocation of attention, and interesting things can effectively disperse pain [2].
3. The effect of emotions on pain
The relationship between pain and emotional experience also raises researchers’ attention. The elaboration can be divided into two main statement. Some researchers claimed that, there is no need to identify the specific type of emotional experience, but just to simply multiply the emotional experience between positive and negative is enough or the investigation [3]. They use slides to elicit either negative (attack scenario) or positive (sweet couples) were then asked to immerse their hands in the energy in cold water which can causes pain. The results show that, compared with the negatively induced group the pain threshold (in terms of time scale) of the positive encouraged group is much higher. Researchers used similar slides to evoke emotions, but in a relatively short period of time, temporary positive, negative, and neutral slides were used for 6 seconds each, and each group was shaken during the slide presentation. The results showed that watching positive slide, subjects perceived lower levels of pain intensity, this result supports the guess of Meagher, Arnau and Rhudy [4].
Other researchers have focused on refining the relationship between emotion and pain. These researchers divided negative emotions into sadness, anger, fear, and so on. Positive emotions are divided into anticipation of relief(satisfaction /pride) and the sense of proud when people tolerate pain easily. For example, through hypnosis, subjects experience emotions. A series of studies have shown that this negative emotion increases the degree of pain experienced by the subject, reduces the degree of pain experienced by the subject in terms of arousal and control over pain, while experiencing positive emotions has the opposite effect. Different emotional experiences correspond to different autonomic nervous systems unified response -- the subjects' breathing and heart rate were present during different emotional experiences [5]. Loggia, Mogil and Bushnell pay particular attention to the effect of compassion on pain. They do this by asking people to listen to sad stories and evoke feelings for others. When the subjects are subsequently exposed to heat stimulation, the results show that more compassionate subjects experience a high degree of empathy and believe that harmful heat is more painful. Therefore, increasing empathy increases the intensity of pain and corresponding unpleasant experiences [6].
In general, research on the relationship between emotional experience and pain has consistently showed that the positive emotional experiences can relieve pain, while negative one can elevate pain. A recent study on fear research into pain reduction has come to a different conclusion that doubt the previous results. In this study, subjects were divided into three groups -- the first group and the second group were told that they might or might not receive a sudden shock, While the first group received an electric shock, the second group did not. The third group was told that they would not be shocked and that they would not be shocked. In the subsequent painful stimulus phase, all subjects were subjected to painful heat Stimulation, and the results showed that after triggering the fear, the participants' pain decreased weak [7].
4. Psychological Factors Affecting Pain Perception
Pain perception is a complex process influenced by various psychological factors. These factors can significantly impact an individual's experience of pain, resulting in different pain thresholds and pain tolerance levels. Understanding the psychological factors that affect pain perception is crucial for improving pain management strategies and interventions. This section reviews the key psychological factors that influence pain perception.
One important psychological factor is cognitive appraisal. The way individuals evaluate and interpret a painful stimulus can significantly shape their perception of pain. For example, individuals who perceive pain as a threat may experience higher levels of pain compared to those who perceive it as a challenge. Furthermore, an individual's beliefs and expectations about pain can also influence their pain perception. Studies have shown that individuals with negative pain-related beliefs tend to report higher levels of pain intensity and disability compared to those with positive beliefs.
Emotional factors also play a significant role in pain perception. Negative emotions such as anxiety, fear, and depression can amplify the experience of pain. These emotions can alter the pain processing pathways in the brain, resulting in increased pain sensitivity and decreased pain tolerance. On the other hand, positive emotions such as happiness and relaxation can have analgesic effects, reducing the perception of pain.
Past experiences and psychological trauma can also influence pain perception. Individuals who have experienced previous traumatic events or painful procedures may have heightened pain sensitivity due to the activation of pain-related memories and associations. Additionally, individuals with a history of chronic pain may exhibit altered pain perception due to changes in the central nervous system.
Personality traits can also affect pain perception. Certain personality traits, such as neuroticism and resilience, have been found to be associated with pain sensitivity. Individuals with high levels of neuroticism tend to have lower pain thresholds and show higher levels of pain catastrophizing. In contrast, individuals with high levels of resilience may have higher pain tolerance and exhibit better coping mechanisms in the face of pain.
Social factors can also impact pain perception. Social support, for instance, has been found to have a moderating effect on pain perception. Individuals with a strong support system tend to perceive less pain and have better functional outcomes compared to those with limited social support. Cultural influences can also shape pain perception, as different cultures may have varying beliefs, attitudes, and norms related to pain expression and pain management.
In summary, psychological factors exert a significant influence on pain perception. Cognitive appraisal, emotional factors, past experiences, personality traits, and social factors all contribute to an individual's pain perception and response. Understanding these psychological factors can contribute to the development of more effective pain management interventions targeted at addressing the specific psychological needs of individuals experiencing pain. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms and interactions between these factors to improve pain management strategies.
5. Pain Perception in Infants and Children
Pain perception in infants and children is a topic of great interest and importance in the field of healthcare. Understanding how pain is perceived at different stages of development is essential for providing appropriate pain management interventions. This section of the literature review will explore the factors influencing pain perception in infants and children, shedding light on the unique aspects of pain perception in this population.
Biological factors play a significant role in pain perception among infants and children. One important factor is the immaturity of the nervous system. Studies have shown that the pain pathways in infants and young children are not fully developed, resulting in heightened pain sensitivity and a reduced ability to inhibit or regulate pain signals. Additionally, the presence of developmental changes in the peripheral nerves and pain receptors contribute to differences in pain perception between infants and adults.
Psychological factors also influence pain perception in infants and children. One key factor is cognitive development. Infants and young children may not have the cognitive abilities to fully comprehend and express their pain experiences. This fact can lead to challenges in accurately assessing and managing their pain. Furthermore, emotional factors such as anxiety and fear can intensify the perception of pain in this population. For example, studies have shown that children who experience higher levels of anxiety prior to a painful procedure tend to report higher levels of pain intensity.
Socio-cultural factors can also influence pain perception in infants and children. Cultural beliefs and practices surrounding pain expression and management vary across different societies. For instance, some cultures may encourage children to express pain openly, while others may discourage overt pain behaviors. These cultural influences can shape children's perceptions and responses to pain.
Overall, pain perception in infants and children is influenced by a combination of biological, psychological, and socio-cultural factors. The immaturity of the nervous system, cognitive development, and cultural beliefs all contribute to the unique pain experiences in this population. Understanding these factors is crucial for healthcare professionals to effectively assess and manage pain in infants and children, ensuring their well-being and promoting optimal development. Further research is needed to explore these factors in more depth and develop tailored interventions for pediatric pain management.
6. Pain Perception in the Elderly
The perception of pain in the elderly population is a topic of significant interest and concern in the field of healthcare. As individuals age, they may experience changes in their physiological, psychological, and socio-cultural factors, which can influence the way they perceive and experience pain. Understanding the factors that affect pain perception in the elderly is crucial for providing appropriate pain management and improving the overall quality of life for this population.
Biological factors play a significant role in pain perception in the elderly. Physiological changes associated with aging, such as decreased sensitivity of nerve endings and reduced production of endogenous pain modulators, can impact the intensity and duration of pain experienced. Additionally, comorbidities commonly seen in older adults, such as arthritis or neuropathy, can further contribute to the complexity of pain perception. These biological factors need to be considered when assessing and managing pain in the elderly.
Psychological factors also play a crucial role in pain perception in the elderly. As individuals age, they may experience increased rates of depression, anxiety, and cognitive decline, which can influence their experience and interpretation of pain. Furthermore, the presence of chronic pain can have a significant impact on the psychological well-being of older adults, leading to decreased functioning and quality of life. Addressing these psychological factors is essential in managing pain perception in the elderly population.
In addition to biological and psychological factors, socio-cultural influences also affect pain perception in the elderly. Older adults may have different cultural beliefs and attitudes towards pain, which can influence their pain expression and communication. Social support, family dynamics, and cultural norms around pain management can also influence the way pain is perceived and managed in the elderly population. Healthcare providers need to consider these socio-cultural factors when assessing and treating pain in older adults.
Overall, pain perception in the elderly is a complex phenomenon influenced by various biological, psychological, and socio-cultural factors. Recognizing these factors and tailoring pain management strategies accordingly is crucial for providing effective and individualized care for older adults. Further research is needed to better understand the specific mechanisms underlying pain perception in the elderly and to develop targeted interventions to improve pain management in this population. By addressing the unique needs of older adults, healthcare providers can optimize pain relief and enhance the overall well-being of the elderly population.
7. Previous research methods on Pain Perceptions
In previous studies on pain perception, researchers have employed various methodologies to investigate the factors influencing pain perception. One commonly used method is the experimental approach, where participants are exposed to controlled painful stimuli in laboratory settings. This allows researchers to manipulate certain variables and measure the participants' pain perception.
For example, in a study by Smith et al., participants were asked to rate their pain intensity using a numeric rating scale after undergoing thermal pain stimulation. The researchers manipulated the temperature of the stimulation and found that higher temperatures led to higher pain ratings. This study highlights the importance of external stimuli in influencing pain perception.
Another commonly employed methodology is the use of questionnaires or self-report measures to assess pain perception. These measures often ask participants to rate their pain experiences, evaluate their pain tolerance, or indicate their level of distress or discomfort. For instance, in a study by Johnson et al., participants completed the McGill Pain Questionnaire, which assesses various dimensions of the pain experience, including sensory, affective, and evaluative components. This study provided valuable insights into the subjective experience of pain and the individual differences in pain perception.
Moreover, some researchers have utilized neuroimaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), to investigate the neural correlates of pain perception. By examining the brain regions activated during painful stimuli, researchers can better understand the underlying neural mechanisms of pain perception. For instance, Apkarian et al. used fMRI to investigate the brain activity of participants while they experienced painful heat stimuli. They found that the activation of certain brain regions, such as the anterior cingulate cortex and the insula, was associated with the perception of pain intensity. This study provided valuable insights into the neural circuitry involved in pain perception.
In addition to these methodologies, some studies have employed observational techniques to understand pain perception in specific populations, such as infants or individuals with developmental disabilities. Observational methods involve carefully documenting and analyzing the pain behaviors exhibited by individuals in response to painful stimuli. For instance, Grunau et al. used video analysis to assess the pain responses of premature infants during routine healthcare procedures. The researchers identified specific pain behaviors, such as facial grimacing and limb movements, which indicated the infants' pain perception.
Overall, previous studies on pain perception have utilized a range of methodologies, including experimental approaches, self-report measures, neuroimaging techniques, and observational methods. These diverse methodologies have allowed researchers to explore various aspects of pain perception and uncover the factors influencing its development. By employing rigorous and innovative methodologies, future research can continue to advance our understanding of the complex nature of pain perception and its underlying mechanisms.
8. Conclusion
In a nutshell, this essay is focusing on two factors that may affect people’s feeling of pain. Through a serious of experiments, the result ends up matches the prediction at first, that the intensity of mind can affect people’s feeling of pain, the more people distract the less pain they can feel; on the other hand there are some certain influence on people’s emotions but it is more irregularly, the overall trend it that optimistic emotion experience can lead to less pain tolerant, but the result depends on multiple ways and time of giving the stimulation.
References
[1]. Bohns, V. K., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2012). It hurts when I do this (or you do that): Posture and pain tolerance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 341–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.022
[2]. Crombez, G., Eccleston, C., De Vlieger, P., Van Damme, S., & De Clercq, A. (2007). Is it better to have controlled and lost than never to have controlled at all? An experimental investigation of control over pain. Pain, 137(3), 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.028
[3]. Meagher, M. W., Arnau, R. C., & Rhudy, J. L. (2001). Pain and Emotion: Effects of Affective Picture Modulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/ 00006842-200101000-00010
[4]. Rhudy, J. L., Williams, A. E., McCabe, K. M., Nguye~n, M. A. T. V., & Rambo, P. (2005). Affective modulation of nociception at spinal and supraspinal levels. Psychophysiology, 0(0), 050826083855001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00313.x
[5]. Rainville, P., Bao, Q. V. H., & Chrétien, P. (2005). Pain-related emotions modulate experimental pain perception and autonomic responses. Pain, 118(3), 306–318. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.022
[6]. Rhudy, J. L., & Meagher, M. W. (2003). Negative affect: effects on an evaluative measure of human pain. Pain, 104(3), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00119-2
[7]. MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why Does Social Exclusion Hurt? The Relationship Between Social and Physical Pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202
Cite this article
Yu,J. (2023). Research on factors affecting pain perception. Theoretical and Natural Science,15,146-151.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Modern Medicine and Global Health
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Bohns, V. K., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2012). It hurts when I do this (or you do that): Posture and pain tolerance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 341–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.022
[2]. Crombez, G., Eccleston, C., De Vlieger, P., Van Damme, S., & De Clercq, A. (2007). Is it better to have controlled and lost than never to have controlled at all? An experimental investigation of control over pain. Pain, 137(3), 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.028
[3]. Meagher, M. W., Arnau, R. C., & Rhudy, J. L. (2001). Pain and Emotion: Effects of Affective Picture Modulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/ 00006842-200101000-00010
[4]. Rhudy, J. L., Williams, A. E., McCabe, K. M., Nguye~n, M. A. T. V., & Rambo, P. (2005). Affective modulation of nociception at spinal and supraspinal levels. Psychophysiology, 0(0), 050826083855001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00313.x
[5]. Rainville, P., Bao, Q. V. H., & Chrétien, P. (2005). Pain-related emotions modulate experimental pain perception and autonomic responses. Pain, 118(3), 306–318. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.022
[6]. Rhudy, J. L., & Meagher, M. W. (2003). Negative affect: effects on an evaluative measure of human pain. Pain, 104(3), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00119-2
[7]. MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why Does Social Exclusion Hurt? The Relationship Between Social and Physical Pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202